"Today's Statement" Cases and Analysis

Very relevant

An employer in Fuzhou City often abused the nanny at home, and finally one day beat the nanny to death. In order to destroy the body and eliminate traces of it, the employer's wife pretended to be the nanny's sister and cremated the body. The court ruled that the employer's intentional injury was subject to a suspended death sentence, and the wife's cover-up was sentenced to 3 years in prison.

Expert analysis shows that the relationship between employer and nanny is not that of master and servant, and the status of both parties is equal. The country should amend the labor law to protect the legitimate interests of people like nannies who have personal employment relationships. Now their interests cannot be guaranteed in any way. In addition, in order to restrain the nanny's behavior, the employer should sign a good contract with the nanny, or use the power of judicial organs.

The consequences are really serious

Chen Bing found a thief stealing his bag at the train station and chased him. I chased him for about 200 meters. The result was sudden death. The thief had no physical contact with him. Sports medicine experts analyzed that he may have died suddenly due to heart problems.

Experts analyzed that there was a causal relationship between the thief's theft and Chen Bing's death. But it only constitutes the crime of theft. It may be used as an aggravating factor when sentencing. The thief was at fault for Chen Bing's death, but Chen Bing's family did not file a civil compensation claim against the thief. In the end, the thief was sentenced to 4 years and fined 3,000 for attempted theft.

Where are you

An 18-year-old boy came to Shenyang with his working parents. One day, I went to play at Dingxiang Lake with my friends. But was drowned in the lake. According to friends who went out with him, he jumped into the lake to save someone. They said that the man ran away after being rescued. They only went to save their friends and did not see what the man looked like. After pushing the rescued person ashore, the child was knocked into the lake by a big wave and never came up again. His family's conditions are not good, and he will be his parents' only support in the future. His father consulted the civil affairs agency and said that he could apply for martyrdom, but the rescued people needed to come forward to testify. The family had been looking for the rescued person for many days, but the person never showed up. Later, several lakeside workers were willing to testify for the children.

Experts analyzed that for those who act bravely, the state and society should first compensate them, and the rescued people should bear relatively small obligations. The state has set up a volunteer fund, and part of the taxpayer's tax money is used for this purpose.

Today’s case is very infuriating.

A 3-year-old child went to a hotel for dinner with his parents. During the dinner, the child wanted to drink, and the mother went out to buy it, hoping that the child would follow the father. But the child did not want to, so the mother took him away. Later, the child ran onto the road. A hotel attendant rescued the child, but he himself died in a car accident.

The child's parents initially said that they had entrusted the child to the bar, and later said that they had entrusted the child to the waiter, but there was no evidence to prove it. They believed the waiter should be held responsible for the child's injuries.

The two parties went to court. The court ruled that the driver responsible for the traffic accident should bear 80% of the civil compensation liability, and the parents of the child should bear 20%. The total death compensation was 150,000 yuan. However, the indemnifier objected that the waiter was from a rural area. If you have a registered permanent residence, even if you work in the city for 2 years, you should be compensated 50,000 yuan according to rural standards.

The mystery of the death of an old man

A 79-year-old man had a dispute with a 30-year-old young man. Only 10 hours later, the old man died. The old man's family said that the old man was beaten to death by that man, and the young man said that the old man died of a heart attack. Since it happened behind a house in the courtyard, there were no witnesses on either side. After the old man died, the Public Security Bureau came, but they insisted not to perform an autopsy and directly said that the old man died of a heart attack. They asked both parties for civil mediation and settled the matter with a compensation of 8,000 yuan. When the reporter asked about how to identify the evidence as a heart attack, the Public Security Bureau never had it, and maybe it simply couldn't provide it.

Later, the old man’s family lodged a protest with the public security bureau. The county and city public security bureaus opened the coffin of the old man and conducted an autopsy. The conclusion was that the old man had committed suicide by taking poisonous rat poison. The old man's family was very suspicious of this and secretly took several samples to a nearby university for testing. The result was that they did not contain toxic rat poison.

After the family’s continuous efforts, a few years later, the old man’s coffin was opened for the second time. The provincial department’s appraisal concluded that it was not as strong as poisonous rats.

The reporter wanted to find the two forensic doctors who made the original identification, but they were refused. Later, the Public Security Bureau apologized and paid more than 50,000 yuan in compensation.

The matter is over, and how the old man died will never be known.