Is the background wall of tobacco hotel infringed by Kweichow Moutai?

According to Article 57 of the Trademark Law of People's Republic of China (PRC), any of the following acts is an infringement of the exclusive right to use a registered trademark:

(1) Using the same trademark as its registered trademark on the same commodity without the permission of the trademark registrant;

(2) Without the permission of the trademark registrant, using a trademark similar to its registered trademark on the same kind of goods, or using a trademark identical with or similar to its registered trademark on similar goods is likely to cause confusion;

(3) selling goods that infringe upon the exclusive right to use a registered trademark;

(4) Forging or unauthorized manufacturing of registered trademark marks of others or selling forged or unauthorized registered trademark marks;

(five) without the consent of the trademark registrant, the registered trademark is changed and the goods with the changed trademark are put on the market again;

(6) Deliberately facilitating the infringement of the exclusive right to use a trademark of others and helping others to commit the infringement of the exclusive right to use a trademark;

(seven) causing other damage to the exclusive right to use a registered trademark of others. Among them, it is an infringement of the exclusive right to use a registered trademark if it causes other damage to the exclusive right to use a registered trademark of others. In this case, the actor used another person's registered trademark for the decoration of the door, which easily misled consumers and constituted an infringement of the exclusive right to use another person's registered trademark. Similar behavior is not uncommon in business activities. The judge reminded merchants not to "scratch the ball" with luck, but to create their own brand effect and operate legally through legal channels.