The man took a shortcut to drive on the overpass: why can't he be woken up only when the bridge collapses and people die?

A video of a car driving on an overpass caused widespread discussion. In the video, a blue car was driving on an overpass and had to reverse after being stopped by passers-by (it was reported that the man was cutting corners). It was confirmed that the accident occurred on the afternoon of March 12, on a footbridge near Qinghe in Haidian District, Beijing. At present, the man has been given administrative detention by the police for allegedly disturbing the order of public places.

In fact, the occurrence of this kind of thing, public opinion, there must be an angry atmosphere. No matter whether the driver will affect the normal pedestrians on the overpass, it will also make people feel invisible in terms of the "safety risk" of their behavior. Fortunately, there was no major safety accident, which is also a blessing.

However, it is undeniable that this kind of behavior itself has brought great adverse effects. From the perspective of traffic rules, this is obviously a violation, and it is an unusual violation. This is even more worrying as far as disturbing public order is concerned. After all, driving on a "footbridge" can easily lead to a "bridge collapse" accident, causing a large number of casualties.

In the final analysis, as far as the harm of uncertainty is concerned, the probability of occurrence and non-occurrence is not important. It is important to rule out opportunities as long as there are some possibilities. Otherwise, the slip after luck will inevitably usher in a doomed tragedy forever. Just a few days ago, the "Quanzhou Xinjia Hotel Collapsed" incident happened. It is reported that the owner found that the foundation of the house was settled and the load-bearing column was deformed.

However, the owner did not reduce the loss in time, but continued to take risks until the accident occurred. Frankly speaking, many times, "lucky psychology" is like this, always thinking that their fierceness will not strike. Therefore, we will ignore it and do whatever it takes to achieve our goal.

But when the "lucky psychology" is seen by others and the "lucky behavior" is sanctioned by the rules, the lucky person will "wake up". But there is no room for violence here, and there is no reason for violence. Therefore, it is necessary for us to make a basic analysis of the psychology and behavior of "ignoring rules" on the basis of tragic facts.

The existence of "public rules" is to serve and protect more people to the maximum extent. Therefore, going beyond the rules itself is an act that hurts more people. As far as the result of "the car is on the overpass" is concerned, there seems to be no specific harm. However, as a reflection of "hindsight", as long as the weight of the bridge is not enough to support the weight of the car, it is easy to collapse or overturn.

After all, this is a "footbridge", not an "elevated highway". Moreover, to some extent, "this time" luck is different from "ordinary" luck. So this kind of behavior is of course zero tolerance. Because, for the right and wrong of the public, in addition to being result-oriented, we must also look at the causal relationship. Only in this way can this tragedy be avoided to the greatest extent.

Unfortunately, no matter how hard the rules are, they will be loosened by human nature. It should be common sense that "footbridges" can't take "cars", but it can't be counted as traffic rules. But even so, there are always people who eat this "crab". Even though he has predicted "danger" and "violation of punishment", he is still willing to take risks, regardless.

Therefore, in terms of luck, we need to be more comprehensive. Generally speaking, we must face these two aspects: first, the possible harmful consequences only affect the parties; Second, for the possible adverse consequences, harm others and harm yourself. To a certain extent, the scale of propaganda emphasizes "two", and the existence of "one" can only be self-inflicted. People will sympathize and pity, but they will not interfere or stop.

We are used to calling it "death behavior", which only affects ourselves. Although it is not advocated, it is hard to say anything. After all, people are willing to suffer by themselves, and outsiders can only see jokes and cannot directly interfere. In fact, this is like "suicidal behavior", which is unethical. However, others can only be "outsiders" honestly, and it is not good to ask too much.

The important point of the lucky behavior of "harming others and harming yourself" is "harming others", that is, interfering with the interests of others. In this case, this is of course not allowed. Therefore, for the matter of "opening an overpass", as an account, men must also pay the price. Otherwise, the public interest will be harmed.

Remember, to a large extent, those who "flout the rules" also know their violations and their consequences. But they are willing to take risks because they can get some "convenience" in the process of going beyond the rules. For example, "cutting corners" can save time and even "save fuel".

Of course, smart people won't do this kind of calculation, because "time" and "gas money" are nothing compared with life. Here, from the perspective of right and wrong, the so-called "chicken thief" behavior is essentially stupid. Even if you magnify this stupidity, you will find that "ignoring the rules" is the ultimate way out.

Because it is easy for us to imagine that if all cars ignore the rules and drive on the overpass, then the meaning of "pedestrian overpass" will be completely lost. In this case, pedestrians and vehicles may get into chaos. The end result may be dozens of times of obeying the rules.

Unfortunately, the "bridge collapse" can awaken the "watched", but it may not awaken the "bystanders". Therefore, tragedies often repeat themselves, but some people really "muddle through" and some people may not wait for time to wake up. In this regard, even if the man is punished in the incident of "driving on the overpass", she will always be lucky.

After all, he can live to learn the lesson. We can assume that if he drives to the bridge, it will collapse or overturn. He may be injured or killed himself, but so may others near the bridge. At that time, talking about "regret medicine" and saying "sorry" would look extremely pale.

Admitting the rules is not knowing what to do, but being afraid. The meaning of "Fu" is just like walking on the edge of a knife, without necessarily leaving a scar. However, falling down means "blood spatter" and "death". Many times, "danger" and "potential danger" do not depend on the danger itself, but on how the people concerned face the danger and how to evaluate it. This seems to tell ordinary people that this is a "compulsory course" in life.