Introduce Wu Ying and his case.

Wu Ying, the former legal representative of Zhejiang Bense Holding Group Co., Ltd., was arrested on March 6, 2007 on suspicion of illegally absorbing public deposits. 19 In February, Jinhua Intermediate People's Court made a first-instance judgment according to law, and sentenced the defendant Wu Ying to death for the crime of fund-raising fraud, deprived of political rights for life, and confiscated all personal property. 20 10 1 Wu Ying refused to accept the judgment of the first instance and appealed. On April 7th, 20 1 1, Zhejiang Higher People's Court began the second trial of Wu Ying's case. 20121kloc-0/8, Zhejiang Higher People's Court made a second-instance judgment on the case of the defendant Wu Ying's fund-raising fraud, and ruled that Wu Ying's appeal was rejected and the death sentence of the defendant Wu Ying was upheld. On April 20 12, Wu Ying's death penalty was not approved by the Supreme Law, and the case was sent back to the Zhejiang Provincial High Court for retrial. Detention at about 4: 30 pm on February 10, 2007, without any warning in advance (at least in the eyes of ordinary employees and citizens), all stores of Bense Group in Dongyang were controlled by Dongyang police in just a few minutes. That night, the Dongyang Municipal Government announced that Wu Ying had been criminally detained by the local public security organs on suspicion of illegally absorbing public deposits, and the Bense Group was also put on file for investigation. Creditor's rights and debts related to their true colors shall be registered. (Government debt not issued) First trial On June 5438+February 18, 2009, Jinhua Intermediate People's Court made a first-instance judgment according to law, and sentenced the defendant Wu Ying to death for the crime of fund-raising fraud, deprived of political rights for life, and confiscated all personal property. Wu Yingan Wu Ying, with technical secondary school education, is the legal representative of Zhejiang Bense Holding Group Co., Ltd., and lived in Room 9 13 of Dongyang Bense Concept Hotel before his arrest. It was found through court trial that in April 2006, before the establishment of Bense Holding Group Co., Ltd., the defendant Wu Ying used the high interest rate ranging from 10,000 yuan per day to 35 yuan, 40 yuan and 50 yuan or the high investment return of 30%, 60% and 80% dividends per quarter as bait to raise funds from Yu, Xia Yaoqin and Xu Yulan140,000 yuan. In the second half of 2005, Wu Ying, which was in debt of tens of millions of yuan, continued to raise funds illegally with high interest rates and high returns as bait, and used the illegal fund-raising funds to falsely register a number of companies. In order to cover up the fact that it is heavily in debt and conceal the truth, it adopts the methods of paying high interest or high return on investment, buying real estate, investing in donations by illegal fund-raising, etc., making false propaganda, giving the public the illusion of its strong economic strength and defrauding social funds. On appeal, Wu Ying put forward five reasons for appeal. She believes that her behavior does not constitute a crime of fund-raising fraud, and hopes that the court of second instance will change the sentence according to law. Wu Ying's lawyer, Zhang Yanfeng, has a copy of the appeal. On a thin piece of paper, five reasons for appeal are written concisely: First, there is no intention of fraud subjectively. Most of the funds borrowed by Wu Ying are used for company operations, and only a small part is used to buy personal items, so there is no extravagance and waste; Second, there is no fraud. Did not make false propaganda to the company and cheat creditors. Moreover, it is also a kind of business behavior to repay the company's operating debts with loans. Wu Ying has no fictitious borrowing purposes. Third, creditors do not belong to the public. Wu Ying's creditors are relatives and friends, not fund-raising activities; Fourth, the borrowing behavior is a unit behavior, not Wu Ying's personal behavior; Fifthly, Lin Weiping and other alleged victims in this case were convicted by the court of illegally absorbing public deposits. Therefore, the original judgment is obviously shielding the criminal act of illegally absorbing public deposits. Wu Ying's father, Wu Yongzheng, and his lawyer, Zhang Yanfeng, said on July 29th that after the verdict of the first instance, Wu Ying reported the bribery of about 10 local officials and bank leaders in Jinhua Detention Center, mainly officials from Dongyang City, Jinhua City, where the former Zhejiang Bense Holding Group Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Bense Group) was located, and officials from Jinhua City, Zhejiang Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection and Procuratorate had intervened. Wu Ying, a billionaire sister in the second instance, held a trial in the second instance, claiming that 770 million yuan was a loan of 20 1 1. On April 7, the second trial of Wu Ying, a billionaire sister in Dongyang, Zhejiang Province, was held in Jinhua Intermediate People's Court, Zhejiang Province. In 2009, Jinhua Intermediate People's Court sentenced Wu Ying to death and deprived him of his political rights for life. Wu Ying refused to accept the appeal. The list of reporting officials in Wu Ying will surface, and Wu Ying's father, Wu Yongzheng, hopes that the lawyer will come and get the list of the other seven officials reported by Wu Ying, which does not exclude Dongyang officials. Wu Ying's other defense lawyer, Zhang Yanfeng, now plans to arrange this matter. After the first trial, Wu Ying wrote a complaint against Li Tiangui, former deputy director of the Standing Committee of Jingmen Municipal People's Congress, Liang Zhou, former vice president of Jingmen Agricultural Bank, and Liang Hua, former president of Lishui Lighthouse Branch of China Agricultural Bank, all of whom were sentenced respectively. Returned for retrial 2011165438+1on October 4th, Wang Jun, a judge of Zhejiang High Court who presided over this series of civil lawsuits, confirmed that some civil cases of house property disputes of Bense Group would be sent back for retrial by Zhejiang High Court. Wu Ying, who was sentenced to death in the first instance, ushered in a glimmer of light. Wang Jun said that the case is being handed over and will be sent back to Jinhua Intermediate People's Court for retrial. But he did not disclose the reason for sending him back for retrial. The real estate involved in this civil case is an important part of the assets under the name of Bense Group. On the afternoon of 20 12 65438+ 10/8, Zhejiang Higher People's Court pronounced the case of the defendant Wu Ying's fund-raising fraud in the second instance, ruled that the appeal of the defendant Wu Ying was rejected, upheld the death sentence of the defendant Wu Ying, and reported it to the Supreme People's Court for review according to law. 2065438+On April 20, 2002, the Supreme People's Court believed that the facts of the defendant Wu Ying's fund-raising fraud crime were clear, the evidence was true and sufficient, the first-instance judgment and the second-instance ruling were qualitative and accurate, and the trial procedure was legal. The Supreme People's Court believes that the defendant Wu Ying's fund-raising fraud is extremely huge, which has caused great losses to the victims and seriously undermined the national financial management order. The harm is particularly serious and should be punished according to law. After being brought to justice, Wu Ying truthfully confessed his crimes and confessed the fact that he paid bribes to many public officials. Considering the whole case, Wu Ying was sentenced to death, but it may not be executed immediately. In accordance with Article 199 of the Criminal Procedure Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) and Article 4 of the Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Review of Death Penalty Cases, the defendant Wu Ying was ruled not to be approved for death penalty and sent back to the Zhejiang Higher People's Court for retrial.