What is the influence of informed criticism, the discipline inspection and supervision organ?

Informed criticism is actually a kind of announcement, telling everyone that someone has violated discipline because of something, and letting everyone know that the nature and circumstances of the violation are not very serious. If it is serious, it is a crime.

There are two main types of informed criticism behavior implemented by administrative organs:

Informed criticism is only a kind of administrative punishment that the superior in the administrative organ deals with the subordinate who violates discipline, and the internal supervision department or discipline inspection commission of the administrative organ deals with the violator.

The administrative organ shall publicize the illegal facts of the violator within a certain range, so as to damage his reputation and credibility. This is a measure to punish and educate the violator and educate others widely. At this time, informed criticism belongs to the category of administrative punishment.

In the chapter of legal liability, the relevant laws set up informed criticism, warning and other types of administrative punishment. Including warning, fine, confiscation of illegal income, confiscation of illegal property, order to stop production and business, temporary suspension or revocation of license, temporary suspension or revocation of business license, and administrative detention.

Although there is no informed criticism, it is clear that "other administrative penalties stipulated by laws and administrative regulations", that is to say, other laws and administrative regulations can also set informed criticism as an administrative punishment measure.

For example, Article 43 of the Audit Law stipulates that if the audited entity violates the provisions of this law, refuses or delays to provide information related to audit matters, or the information provided is untrue or incomplete, or refuses or hinders the inspection, the audit institution shall order it to make corrections and may give informed criticism a warning. Refuses to correct, shall be investigated for responsibility according to law.

From the concept of administrative punishment, informed criticism has the basic elements of administrative punishment.

Administrative punishment is an administrative act that the specific administrative organ of the state punishes individuals and organizations that violate administrative laws and regulations according to law. It is administrative, disciplinary and punitive.

Informed criticism is made by the administrative subject for a specific party, which is the embodiment of its administrative authority. It is administrative. informed criticism is a kind of punishment for the rights of the administrative counterpart by the administrative subject, and its reputation is damaged by publishing the illegal acts of the administrative counterpart. The most important thing is that informed criticism is a punishment for the illegal parties on the premise that the administrative counterpart violates the administrative order.

Informed criticism belongs to the disciplinary action in administrative punishment.

The reprimand punishment refers to the administrative punishment that the administrative organ causes certain damage to the reputation, honor, credibility or spiritual interests of the violator as a warning.

Informed criticism is a measure to punish and educate offenders and warn others by publishing their illegal facts.

Extended data:

"Inspectors Wu Moumou, Zhong Moumou and Li Moumou of Wuping Stainless Steel Testing Center play games, visit Taobao and chat QQ during working hours, and now give them to informed criticism ..."

Recently, Wuping County, Fujian Province dealt with 8 staff members of 6 units who found problems in recent unannounced visits by government agencies.

It is understood that by visiting veteran cadres, holding symposiums and distributing questionnaires, the county has learned that some government officials still have problems such as being late for work and leaving early, being inefficient and not implementing their work in place.

In this regard, the county has established a reform and set up a special inspection team for the work style of the organs. On May 26th, the troops were divided into two groups, and made an unannounced visit to the work style of 17 township and county units.

This sudden visit was indefinite in time, uncertain in route and without greeting. By consulting attendance data, surprise roll call, etc., check the on-the-job situation of cadres and workers and the establishment of relevant systems in various units, and check whether there are problems such as chatting online, stock trading, playing games and shopping, getting a card for dinner, being difficult to enter the door, looking ugly, and doing things.

For towns and units that have major problems such as absenteeism and lack of posts, the county performance office instructed the relevant units to improve the rules and regulations and dealt with the relevant personnel seriously. For the units found to have major problems during the inspection, the county performance office issued a supervision proposal, requiring rectification within a time limit.

China discipline inspection and supervision newspaper-Wuping supervisory organ style 8 people were informed criticism