A dumpling restaurant in Nanjing sold leftover jiaozi for the second time, and the process was filmed. Why is the manager still denying it?

Because once the manager admitted it, her charges would be settled, the signboard of their store would definitely be lost, and she would be punished accordingly, so even if there was surveillance shooting, she always chose to deny it.

In fact, it can be seen from the report that the business of their store has always been good, so if they voluntarily admit that they will eat the remaining jiaozi for secondary sales, then their store can be said to be over here. Therefore, the store manager also considered the seriousness of this matter, so he refused to admit it, hoping that there was room for repayment, or he could tell people who didn't know the truth that it was the slander of others.

Although there is video surveillance to testify, she found some excuses full of loopholes, because this matter is still quite serious. Once implemented, there will be penalties from relevant departments, and even whether it is possible to open a store is a problem. So no matter what the final result is, she will definitely not admit it herself. After all, it is not good for her to admit it, and she can't say that she can get everyone's forgiveness through repentance.

It can also be said that she didn't cry until she saw the coffin, so even in the case of conclusive evidence, she still had a chance. But this matter is not a question of whether she is willing to admit it at all, but the evidence is conclusive. No matter how she defends, the facts will not change. So she won't know the pain until the final judgment is made.

To sum up, in the case of video surveillance, the store manager still refused to admit it, mainly because she felt that the judgment had not yet come down. She felt that there was still a glimmer of hope, and of course she could not admit it voluntarily. If she admits the crime, she will sit down and deny it. There is still the possibility of luck.