Is it a crime for a man to be dissatisfied with getting back his whoring money after having sex?

A man met a lady through the internet, and the two sides agreed to book a night in a hotel at a price of 2500 yuan. After the two met, the man transferred money to the woman through WeChat. Unexpectedly, after enjoying it, the man felt worthless and threatened the woman to pay back the money with a knife!

After the man repented, Miss and Miss Bao agreed to open a house through WeChat. The two negotiated an advance payment of 2,500 yuan, and Zhang San transferred it to Miss Bao through WeChat. Miss Bao also arrived at the hotel booked by Zhang San as scheduled after receiving the money for whoring. Who knows that Zhang San suddenly regretted it after they had sex!

Zhang San thought that Miss Bao was not worth the price of 2500 yuan at all, so she asked Miss Bao for a refund. Miss Bao thinks that she has provided the service and there is no refund problem. So Zhang San took out a fruit knife from her carry-on bag and threatened Miss Bao to return 2500 yuan, otherwise she would cut her face with a knife. Miss Bao turned pale with fear and had to transfer 2500 yuan back to Zhang San. Zhang San confirmed that 2500 yuan had arrived and left. Miss Bao chose to call the police after Zhang San left.

The act of taking back prostitutes and Miss Bao violated the Law on Public Security Administration Punishment, so the transaction is not protected by law. The acts of Miss Bao and Miss Zhang San should be punished in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Law on Public Security Administration Punishment.

Although Miss Bao's behavior is not protected by law, Zhang San has transferred the prostitute's money to Miss Bao. Once the transfer is completed, Zhang San loses the ownership of the money. For the purpose of illegal possession, Zhang San used violent threats to take personal property that no longer belongs to her as her own, which has violated the crime of robbery according to law and should bear criminal responsibility.

After the police put Zhang San on file for robbery, the 2,500 yuan of stolen money seized after Zhang San was arrested and brought to justice should have been returned to the robbed victim (that is, Miss Bao), but considering that the stolen money belongs to the property obtained by Miss Bao in violation of the Law on Public Security Administration Punishment, the public security organ should recover it and turn it over to the state treasury.