How do you evaluate Yu Dan and Mr. Monman?

Many people like Chinese studies. Both Mr. Yu Dan and Mr. Mengman promote Chinese studies. They have made a name for themselves in some cultural programs, which makes people remember them. However, they have different opinions on some occasions, which makes people think that their names are not true. Finally, they left our sight!

1. From smash hit to image collapse

Yu Dan, a professor at Beijing Normal University, is good at hosting, not cultural interpretation. However, she became popular with her interpretation of The Analects. Yu Dan interpreted The Analects with a modern way of thinking, which made everyone feel refreshed.

This feeling is the same as that of the author of The Things of the Ming Dynasty. It makes people feel very interesting and willing to read it.

Mr. Yu Dan talked in Kan Kan in the lecture room, which was amazing. Everyone pays great attention to this program, which makes teacher Yu Dan feel the fire. She not only publishes books, but also gives lectures everywhere. These expenses far exceed her as a teacher. Perhaps it is this experience that makes her feel different. She is no longer a teacher, but a businessman.

As a businessman, you have to make profits. When you give a speech at Peking University, you just tell the students some chicken soup, which arouses students' dissatisfaction, which Mr. Yu Dan didn't expect.

In a business environment, chicken soup can be said, although these chicken soup are toxic to some people. Teacher Yu Dan feels that there is no problem with such an interpretation.

what makes her questioned is her behavior. When staying in a hotel in England, she was dissatisfied with the hotel and asked to change it. After changing several hotels, she got angry and scolded the assistant and translator. This incident was exposed.

Many people didn't expect that a gentle woman would swear in public. Even if the assistant did something wrong, she shouldn't scold her face, because it would embarrass her.

As a literati, one should have a high quality and should not have such indecent behavior. Look at Degang Guo. He was rumored to have something to do with Wang Mengting. Although this matter was refuted by Wang Mengting, Degang Guo didn't respond. He just wrote a word on the social network: On the fifth day of the Lunar New Year, pinch the villain's mouth.

in the face of others' slanders, he has no intention to argue or say more. Just express your attitude in this way. He hasn't been to college, but he is very literate.

Teacher Yu Dan is a literate person, but her behavior has no culture. Maybe I was angry at that time, but the result of doing so was to damage my image. Teacher Yu Dan didn't explain this matter in public, and may teach and educate people in the university, but her practice is contrary to the caution in The Analects.

Not only she, but also Miss Meng Man. Teacher Meng Man's lecture style is different. Her lecture in "Lecture Room" is question-oriented, and then she answers it in an easy-to-understand way, causing a * * * sound.

Second, from the interpreter to the altar

Ms. Meng Man's parents are university teachers. Since she was a child, she has a good cultural background. Every year, she gives herself a list of 5 books, and she will never let go of the classic books.

It is these readings that have precipitated her cultural accomplishment, and it is these efforts that have made her successful. In "Lecture Room", she first talked about Wu Zetian, threw out all kinds of questions, and then interpreted them. Many people found it very interesting after listening to it.

Because "Lecture Room" is not only for students, but also for people from all walks of life. She used humorous language to spread the knowledge of history, which made everyone feel refreshed.

when she gives a lecture, it is almost packed. She became a famous lecturer in Lecture Room, which also made her famous. Many programs invited her to comment on the scene, including "Chinese Poetry Conference".

In this cultural program, Ms. Meng Man also commented well, so that everyone could appreciate her humor as well as her excellent works. However, there was a problem when she commented on "Benjamin".

is it wrong for her to say "show mercy to farmers" is planting crops? It's noon when weeding. This weeding should be weeding, which seems to be out of line with planting crops. It is also possible to say that planting crops includes planting and weeding.

However, the sensory interpretation of Delighting in Rain on a Spring Night is that Sichuanese eat hot pot, which is a bit far-fetched. Although Sichuanese like to eat hot pot, the feeling of Delighting in Rain on a Spring Night is the author's concern for the world, which is a relatively large pattern.

More importantly, the interpretation of Wuyi Lane is a bit excessive. "In the old days, Wang thanked Tang Qian Yan and flew into the homes of ordinary people." This swallow flew to the home of change.

Liu Yuxi's environment is not social change, but troubled times. What he mainly expresses is the process of the old giants disappearing with the changes of personnel, which is related to change, but not the home of change.

People's reverence for Teacher Meng Man has decreased, and they feel that her interpretation of poetry is drooling. Can cultural interpretation be colloquial? Yes, but if it is too colloquial, it will be a bit vulgar.

The popularity of Mr. Meng Man has gradually declined, and people's awareness of literate people has improved. As disseminators of culture, they have made some contributions, but they have lowered the level of cultural knowledge, which many people don't like.

cultural interpretation varies from person to person. Just because some people's aesthetic tastes are satisfied, we can't think that the public has the same aesthetic taste. Their behavior, being spurned, is conceivable.

Third, the understanding of culture varies from person to person, so we can't force it.

There is not much problem with the interpretation of culture by Mr. Yu Dan and Mr. Monman. Perhaps their fame is too great, and people expect too much from them, so they are not allowed to have any flaws. When they have problems, everyone can't tolerate them, and eventually they fall into the altar.

Some people say that in the Internet age, knowledge is treated equally. Maybe, but you need to have relevant cultural reserves. Yu Dan and Mengman have a good cultural reserve and can interpret a lot of cultural knowledge, but they are biased against the public's cognition and may not understand it.

For example, Ma Weidou once said that the bed in so bright a gleam on the foot of my bed is not the familiar bed, but Mazar-e-Mazar. This makes many people wonder, was the teacher lying to himself at that time?

Not only this, but also Sima Guang smashed the jar. Many people think that this jar is what we understand now. However, Mr. Ma Weidou said that according to the unearthed cultural relics, the jar only appeared in the Southern Song Dynasty, and it should be an urn in the Northern Song Dynasty. There is an idiom called "Please enter the urn"!

this knowledge needs considerable cultural reserves, but it doesn't mean that we can't understand it without knowing it. Although cultural people such as Yu Dan and Mengman have their own interpretations of culture, thousands of people are willing to interpret cultural knowledge themselves.

Some people will say that if there is no cultural reserve, it may be that we are looking for words to create meaning. If you are wrong, you are not afraid, and you are not ashamed. It is also a promotion for everyone to point it out and correct it yourself. As the saying goes: never too old to learn!

Cultural knowledge is something that everyone should have. It would be good if Mr. Yu Dan and Mr. Monman could interpret culture well and let us appreciate it.

However, they chose a colloquial interpretation and said some incorrect knowledge, which was a bit misleading. As for whether they will apologize in private, I don't know.

Many people think that the image collapse of Yu Dan and Mengman is actually their misunderstanding of knowledge. If ordinary people misread it, it is ok. But they can't, because their image is the disseminator of culture.

They should be pious in learning cultural knowledge and practical in preaching, not for the sake of temporary fame. I hope they will spread more valuable knowledge in their later life!

Write at the end:

Cultural people speak civilized words and do civilized things. Teacher Yu Dan's words and deeds are different, which leads to her image being damaged; Teacher Meng Man's interpretation of poetry was flawed, which made her fall to the altar. Such a famous cultural person can make mistakes, not to mention us ordinary people.

To understand culture and learn knowledge is to improve one's cultural accomplishment and to raise one's spiritual level. Not for fame, nor for being a cultural clown, what do you think?