Traditional Culture Encyclopedia - Hotel franchise - A woman in Changsha spent 890,000 yuan to buy a male model, and found that her partner wanted it back after marriage. Do you think she can get it back?

A woman in Changsha spent 890,000 yuan to buy a male model, and found that her partner wanted it back after marriage. Do you think she can get it back?

In April of 20021year, a 27-year-old male model Xiao Hu, known by Changsha No.3 Entertainment KTV, lived together for half a year, and a 50-year-old woman Zhou filed a lawsuit, claiming that Xiao Hu had concealed the objective fact of being married and demanded more than 890,000 yuan from herself. Xiao Hu argued that without spending so much money, Zhou knew that he had been married for a long time and filed a lawsuit again to keep in touch. In addition, on June 6, 20021,15, "entertainment No.3" KTV was investigated and dealt with by the public security department according to law for pornographic transactions, and then its business was suspended.

The court held that this phenomenon stems from the abnormal connection between entertainment places and illegal sex trade. Xiao Hu won Zhou's favor at the expense of human body and self-esteem, and Zhou used funds to fill the huge age difference. Simply put, "supporting female college students and being adopted" has indeed subverted the traditional moral cognition of normal people.

Zhou, born in 1972, is a businesswoman. June 5438+October 2022 10 filed a lawsuit with the court, which was heard by the court. Zhou filed a lawsuit, claiming that in early April of 20021year, she and Xiao Hu fell in love and lived together after being known by good friends, and Xiao Hu repeatedly asked her for money for various reasons. By 202 1 and 10, she had paid 895,995 yuan to Xiao Hu through WeChat, mobile phone transfer and cash.

Zhou said that after she happened to find out that Xiao Hu was married, she got along with Xiao Hu with the goal of getting married. Xiao Hu cheated his assets and concealed the objective fact that he was married, which led him to fall into a wrong view. So he filed a lawsuit and Xiao Hu stipulated that all fees should be refunded.

Xiao Hu, born in 1995, is a farmer in Xiangtan County, Hunan Province. He argued that Zhou made up the story of getting married instead of getting along, and he met him at KTV, the paid escort of No.3 Entertainment. He is a male model of KTV, and Zhou is very clear about his work. Most of his personal transfers are used for KTV transactions of No.3 Entertainment.

Xiao Hu shows that Zhou is optimistic about his youth, handsomeness and understanding rather than maintaining the relationship between men and women. He also maintains the relationship with other men. Zhou also contacted his wife Lin many times and repeatedly revealed that Lin was his wife.

Xiao Hu also said that the expenses of Zhou's begging, except for the transaction in "No.3 Entertainment" KTV, were used for the other party's holiday travel and daily living expenses as his own remuneration. Another 60 thousand yuan was sent by Zhou because his father was ill in hospital. So he didn't get unjust enrichment and didn't return the responsibility.

Xiangtan County People's Court holds that the relationship between Zhou and Xiao Hu is essentially different from the love relationship for the purpose of marriage. The characteristics and amount of money transactions should also be comprehensively identified and distinguished. It is determined that from 20021April 15, those who know each other and have a record of WeChat transfer will end on June 15, and the original "No.3 Entertainment" KTV will be enforced for pornographic transactions. Xiao Hu's WeChat income is * * 365,000 yuan, and his expenditure is 275,400.16 yuan. His mobile phone transfer income is 236,000 yuan, and his expenditure is 178567.78 yuan. Xiao Hu's total income was RMB 6,065,438+0,000.

The above expenses rule out valid doubts. Xiao Hu or Xiao Hu, accompanied by Zhou, spent money on KTV, shopping, catering, holiday travel and part of cohabitation in "No.3 Entertainment", which was transferred to Xiao Hu's manager by Zhou. The difference 147032.06 yuan has not been deducted from Xiao Hu's normal remuneration as a general reasonable and legal employee in the entertainment field and other effective expenses during his cohabitation.

The court held that the transfer funds that could not be established to show their main purposes and characteristics were quite different, and some of them were indeed unjust enrichment of Xiao Hu, which caused losses to Zhou, which met the constitutive requirements of unjust enrichment. This week, the appellee was asked to return the above money in full, but the court did not apply it. 1. Xiao Hu was sentenced to return 70,000 yuan of unjust enrichment.

During this period, both of them basically lived together, and Xiao Hu was relatively idle and didn't go out to work. Zhou also stipulated not to go out to work, and declared that "you (Xiao Hu) are under great pressure at work now. Isn't it enough for me (Zhou) to give tens of thousands of dollars a month?" It's not enough for me to give tens of thousands of dollars a month "and" how much does your family want? " "It can be seen that in the same life period, the key to living expenses assets comes from Zhou, and the difference is also a personal gift from Zhou, so Zhou's request to return the above difference is not applicable.

Zhou also claimed that on Xiao Hu's birthday, he paid more than 654.38+10,000 yuan in the form of a red envelope, but Xiao Hu denied and explained that the gift he received on his birthday was Huawei's honor. From the video submitted by Zhou, we can only see that Xiao Hu is opening a capsule, and there are others in the video who narrate "Huawei's Mate40Pro". The short video can't prove that there is 654.38 million yuan in cash in the bag, and Zhou didn't submit other direct evidence to prove it.

During Xiao Hu's father's illness or hospitalization, Zhou transferred more than 60,000 yuan to Xiao Hu in three times. Zhou repeatedly mentioned that "when he saw Xiao Hu's father was ill, he would immediately transfer the money to him", "when Xiao Hu called, he heard that his father was ill and transferred 20 thousand yuan to him", and "when his father was ill, he also transferred tens of thousands of yuan to him", so the money above is average for Xiao Hu's father.

Xiangtan county people's court felt that the two met in the yellow-related places. During the trial, Xiao Hu was blunt about the purpose of getting along with Zhou, saying that "Zhou has always been a customer, and the picture is Zhou's money, so that Zhou can make sales for himself". And Zhou is just looking for excitement and solving loneliness, and you are both willing.

The court mentioned in the judgment that although this abnormal communication originated in entertainment places, illegal sex transactions have been going on, but it is not only sincere, but you love me. Xiao Hu won Zhou's favor at the expense of human body and self-esteem. Zhou used funds to fill the huge age difference between mother and son, and gained Xiao Hu's attention and brevity. In fact, between * * * places, it is a simple situation of "keeping female college students and being kept"

The court felt that although the occupation that Xiao Hu was engaged in was despised by people, his greed for Zhou Qian was, in a word, moderate. The relevant transfers are all from Zhou's personal behavior, and in the process of getting along, I never talked about matters related to preparing for the wedding.

Zhou was obsessed with Xiao Hu's married wife and decided that Xiao Hu and his wife colluded to cheat, but most of the direct evidence submitted was Xiao Hu's wife's communication or recorded phone calls and screenshots. After all, Xiao Hu's wife's manners can't be compared with Xiao Hu's own, so the inference and doubt about Zhou's relationship are not certain.

The ruling holds that both the defendant and the defendant still have a long way to go, and the best policy is to actively seek daily life and seek happiness appropriately and steadily.

On April 24, 2022, Xiangtan County Court ruled that within 10 after the judgment came into effect, Xiao Hu returned Zhou's unjust enrichment of 70,000 yuan and rejected Zhou's other claims.