Why do hotels not allow adults to stay in triple rooms?

Recently, a netizen posted that she went to Beijing with her parents and booked a standard room in a hotel in Dongcheng District through the Internet. However, when I arrived at the hotel to check in, the hotel front desk said that a family of three adults could not stay in the same standard room. They also said that this was a common industry rule.

This netizen was a little puzzled and dissatisfied: "After going out for so many days, including playing in other places, there was no front desk saying that a family of three would not be allowed to stay in one room." She also raised a question : "How should a family of three book a hotel?"

Looking at the comments from netizens, most of them support this girl and think that the hotel is not very humane and is essentially "profit-oriented" performance.

But in fact, looking at the residents, do three adults want to live in the same standard room? Even if they are a family, isn't it essentially for profit: to save money?

So, when it comes to whether a family of three adults is allowed to live in a standard room, everyone’s original intention is just for money: one wants to earn more, and the other wants to save more! Therefore, don’t just criticize hotels as “profit supremacists”.

However, in real life, although the hotel’s industry default rule for “standard rooms”—two beds for two people in a room—is to accommodate two adults, at least In China, our hotels are generally quite "humanized":

Firstly, most hotels will turn a blind eye, because in the fierce market competition, if the business is not so good, , if there are empty beds, most hotels will acquiesce to something like "a family with three adults sharing a room"; secondly, there is also the most reasonable compromise plan: add an extra bed and pay some money at the same time.

As for this hotel in Beijing that does not allow "three adults from a family to stay in the same standard room", it is actually not that common - it mostly happens in big cities with higher occupancy rates. In a "seller's market", if you can't live in the house you like, since the house can be full anyway, why do you need to be humane to three adults living together? And the hotel does not violate the rules by doing so, but complies with industry regulations.

Some people may say: Is there really a clear rule in black and white in the hotel regulations that "three adults are not allowed to share a standard room"? Maybe not necessarily, but the hotel’s approach is still appropriate!

Because the word "standard room" is clearly an explicit "regulation", which refers to two beds in the same room, that is, two adults living there - otherwise, it would be difficult to Can three adults or more be accommodated as non-customers?

According to the "Hotel Industry Hygiene Management Regulations", "The maximum number of guests in a hotel or restaurant room shall not exceed the number of people allowed in the room. Each room shall be calculated separately and the name and number of its occupants shall be registered. , contact number and other information, the door lock can be opened only after checking it, and the check-out list can be checked before leaving. "This shows that hotels must consider factors such as safety and hygiene when specifying room types to ensure the availability and safety of each room.

The hotel is willing to be more serious because of safety and legal responsibility - if it acquiesces or recognizes that "three adults can stay in a standard room", then if an unexpected problem occurs, the hotel will If you have to walk around without food, your responsibility is much greater than if you insist on the "two people in a standard room" rule. So, why do hotels need to expand their scope of responsibility?

Besides, people like the girl who posted this should also consider the habit of "men tending to avoid their mothers, and women tending to avoid their fathers". Maybe this would be better, right?

Of course, people are alive, and in real life, most hotels still turn a blind eye to standard rooms with more than two people staying - but this is " "Serve the people", in fact, it is better to say "serve the RMB". The hotel's purpose of doing this is mainly for profit: retaining guests is much better than not earning any money!

In this matter, since both the tenants and the hotel are essentially thinking about their own interests, then "the boss, don't talk about the second child" - after all, this "interest first" is also a matter of Hold a two-way mirror: one side is the hotel, and the other side is the guest himself!