COVID-19, if there is no isolation, what will be the worst outcome for mankind?

COVID-19, if it is not isolated, what will be the worst outcome for mankind? Professor Yuan from the University of Science and Technology of my country pointed out that if the virus is not contained, the worst result is that its transmissibility will become weaker and weaker, and it will eventually become similar to a common cold, because the original intention of the virus is to survive, not to kill the host. If the host dies, it's all over.

In the long history of human development, we must have experienced countless attacks similar to the new coronavirus. At that time, technology and medicine were not developed, but humans did not perish. Therefore, if no human intervention is exerted, the new coronavirus will The virus will gradually reduce its toxicity through intergenerational mutation, and eventually become harmless to humans and coexist with humans for a long time. Maybe the current influenza virus is a mutation of the previous new coronavirus, but this process will cost humans a huge amount. cost. All mankind's efforts against the new coronavirus are only to reduce this cost. Isolation and observation are still one of the best measures to prevent the spread of the new coronavirus. Only by washing hands frequently, wearing masks and maintaining a safe social distance can we avoid further occurrence of the virus.

It is a fact that the virus disappears as the weather gets hotter and the temperature rises. But saying that the virus does not need to kill the host is just unprofessional. Does it mean that the virus also has a brain and knows how to use the host to survive? Who knows how many viruses have existed in nature for hundreds of millions of years, competing for survival? How can the current virus choose a host that is beneficial to itself? There is no cure for viruses because they are constantly mutating. When new drugs or vaccines are developed and used, new viruses are produced, just like influenza. Therefore, relying on one's own immunity and rising temperatures, the disappearance of the epidemic is an inevitable trend, and there is no need to be unfounded. The principle is this. The virus itself keeps mutating. The highly toxic ones kill the host. When the host dies, these viruses will naturally die. The weak ones are not fatal or even have no effect. Carrying the virus by the host does not affect its presence in nature. The competition for resources in the host system does not threaten the survival of the host, and ultimately leads to a situation of total insecurity.

Therefore, even if the epidemic is not controlled, it will eventually subside naturally. The question is how many hosts die in the process. The essential purpose of controlling the epidemic is to reduce the sharp decline in the population so that it does not affect the normal reproduction of the population. . In fact, the worst outcome is that everyone is infected. Those who can survive have antibodies and those who cannot resist are gone. For viruses with weak virulence, people who are infected have no obvious symptoms and think they are fine, but infect more people, and then slowly eliminate the more virulent viruses. This result is accumulated with human lives. The war between viruses and cells continues. At this time, the attack power of the virus suddenly increased greatly, and it was in an offensive state. The cells were temporarily at a disadvantage. Due to the mutation of the virus, they had a new type of weapon Q.

The existence of the virus is to awaken mankind to be kind to the earth's ecology. Only by adhering to the core concept of harmonious coexistence between man and nature can sustainable development be achieved and the earth can be healthier.