Versace's juxtaposition of Hongkong, Macau and China angered Yang Mi. Why do luxury goods always make such low-level mistakes?

I think these luxury brands make these low-level mistakes. On the one hand, they don't know much about the territory of China, and the designers are not very rigorous when designing this work, and some of their inspection departments are not very rigorous. To some extent, this is a problem caused by the lack of some institutional systems in their company.

It stands to reason that a new product must be checked by multiple departments before it can be officially introduced to the market. First of all, designers lack understanding of the territory of China, while Versace and others are involved in some follow-up inspection departments and even I think it is the public relations department. They all missed something in this respect, which eventually led to the low-level wrong goods flowing into the market.

On the other hand, it may be these luxury brands. Their mistake is an act with ulterior motives. In recent years, China has been very sensitive to these territorial issues. They made such a low-level mistake on this cusp. To some extent, I think he is challenging China's bottom line, and to some extent, they are finding fault. Maybe they have such a wrong idea, maybe their education and some living environment have caused such a wrong cognition.

Now China is very sensitive to territorial issues, and such low-level mistakes are not allowed. There is no shortage of luxury brands in China. Without you, Versace, we have many other luxury brands to choose from. On the land issue, we will not be careless, and Versace will definitely pay the price for openly challenging China's bottom line. He will lose the huge market of China. He is joking about his own interests and future.