A man wants to rape a woman, and the woman persuades him to eat the poisoned noodles. Is this considered self-defense?

Any consciousness does not constitute a crime. Although a man has the consciousness of rape, he is not guilty until it is committed. The woman just found out that the man wanted to behave irregularly and wanted to rape her, so she persuaded him to eat the poisonous noodles. If the man died after eating the poisonous noodles, the woman would be guilty of intentional homicide, and it was not self-defense, let alone "justifiable defense". said.

Ordinary people have ordinary thinking and have different views on one thing and one person. It is just a deviation in the understanding of the problem and the degree of understanding. Consciousness does not constitute a crime. This is not my own point of view. I understand it from the "Legal Theory".

For people in daily life, it can be said that everyone has unsatisfactory things. Some of the reasons for unsatisfactory things are caused by objective factors, but some are caused by human factors.

Some people are full of pride and ambition when it comes to positions and career promotions. When they are immersed in the glory and pride, a competitor will always appear out of nowhere with extraordinary and incomparable despicable methods, which makes them miserable. For a moment, everything was messed up. What was originally intended to be a smooth sailing thing, ended up letting the villain get the upper hand, taking away the position that he had worked hard to manage for many years, and made him heartbroken.

It can be seen that there is hatred and anger in my heart, and I have the idea of ????wanting the other person to disappear, cursing him to be hit by a car when going out, or dying of a sudden illness, and even thinking about many ways this person will die.

No matter how much you think about, it is all personal thinking and consciousness. It is only consciousness, without committing any criminal acts, and without directly harming others. It is the same as normal people, and there is no sin. As the title states, a man wants to rape a woman. Desire is both thought and consciousness, and he has never committed any illegal act. The man is not guilty.

The woman personally expected, assumed, or misjudged that the man was going to rape her. Due to personal misunderstanding, extraordinary means were used, leading to the assumption that the perpetrator died. Since it is intentional homicide, he must bear criminal responsibility. This is not and does not constitute legitimate defense, because the other party has never violated you at all, so where is the defense?

As far as this question is concerned, it is also a hypothetical question. The man was lustful and said a few flirtatious words to the woman, which aroused the woman's alarm and thought that the other party was going to rape her. The subsequent series of reactions were so fast that it was not in line with common sense. , noodles, and poison guides are all ready, this is too convenient...

Besides, men are really the ones who can get excited, get angry, and do whatever they can. Venting, how can I have the endurance and endurance? I still listen to your advice and wait until I eat the poisoned noodles before I do anything.