Who can talk about the significance of the completion of the Bird's Nest? Urgent! ! !

The great significance of the "Bird's Nest" incident

The Olympic Stadium scheme-"Bird's Nest" was approved by the judging committee by an absolute majority.

The rapid development of national economy provides opportunities for China and world-class architects to create the best architectural works in the world today. China's contemporary architectural culture is gradually connecting with the international contemporary architectural art.

In the 1980s, the Great Wall, Beijing, Jingguang, Guo Mao and many other large hotels, hotels and buildings, as well as a large number of commercial buildings such as the Oriental Plaza in the 1990s continued to keep pace with the big roof. The overall state is that the level of contemporary architectural art and architectural culture is in a state of confusion of cultural concepts.

Andrew's plan of "National Grand Theatre" was made in the early 20th century. In operation, all aspects of cultural concepts have gone through a painful process from exploration to understanding. It is worth noting that the courage and courage of decision makers have changed the history of contemporary architecture in China. But some architects were not sure at the time. It was not until the emergence of the evaluation process of the architectural design scheme of Koolhaas "CCTV Building" that the situation changed greatly. In the end, we resolutely accepted the works of the best architects in the world (at least recognized by the world at present).

The determination of the "Bird's Nest" scheme is a manifestation of the gradual improvement of our selection and operation mechanism. Different from the first two schemes, outstanding architects in China and famous contemporary artists in China cooperate with the best architectural firms and architects in the contemporary world, and their works are the perfect combination of artistic language and architectural structure, which is completely different from previous large-scale stadium buildings.

In architectural aesthetics, it pursues new concepts and feelings of people and space. This appearance is a gradual form of functional structure demand, and it is also a continuation and breakthrough of the pursuit of architectural art language and spirit for many years.

The establishment and completion of this scheme will have a far-reaching impact on China's cultural and artistic circles and architectural circles.

From Andrew's National Grand Theatre, Koolhaas' CCTV to the Olympic Center Gymnasium, these three projects have reached a very high level of architectural art in the world today. It can be predicted that in a few years, China people and foreigners will come to Beijing to see these exquisite works of art and the bright spot of these international metropolises-Beijing. It is conceivable that in the near future, Shanghai will also have such a new bright spot in the city.

In this scheme, the government's scheme selection and operation mechanism on architectural art issues provide local government functional departments and developers with the organization method of architectural design scheme selection, and provide a good and sound example from the perspective of contemporary culture and the most advanced international cultural concepts and designers, so that China's urban construction and urban culture can find the correct development method and direction. The architectural design team selected for the scheme consists of the best foreign architects, outstanding domestic youth and contemporary artists. This combination can be used for reference in domestic architectural design, so as to accelerate the influence of contemporary culture on architectural art. In addition, the education in China's architectural education system, which focuses on science and technology, should return to the contemporary cultural level, which is a real piece of the three major components of painting, sculpture, architecture and art history. This is a historical issue.

China real estate newspaper

Renaissance

Architects all over the world are carrying out their architectural practice on the land of China, which brings us a lot of thoughts.

From the perspective of urban planning and architecture, what kind of impression should Beijing give me? The Forbidden City surrounded by high-rise buildings and the essence of traditional art? This is an ordinary city. If all these buildings take place in Shanghai or Guangzhou, we can fully trust the comprehensive vision of the decision makers. However, it is precisely because of Beijing's specific historical and cultural status that we may not just declare to the world that I am open and inclusive when making decisions.

Some people may retort-look at the glass pyramid in front of the Louvre in Paris, look at the Eiffel Tower, and look at the Pompidou Art Center. Our capital should be so tolerant. But let's not forget what the overall impression of the whole city of Paris is-profound historical and cultural accumulation. For Beijing, we are more about destruction than protection.

Of course, every era will leave traces of that era, from the Parthenon in Athens, to the Colosseum in Rome, to the Gothic Notre Dame de Paris, and then to the shocking Eiffel Tower. These are all deductive experiences brought by the development of culture and technology.

How much protection have we given Beijing when we adapt to development and push this city with history and culture to the forefront of the times?