Is it reasonable for the hotel to stipulate that a family of three can't live in one room?

My personal opinion is unreasonable. Actually, I studied hotel management before and worked in a hotel when I graduated. This is really the first time I have heard of it.

Generally, hotels default to one room for two people. Sometimes people choose to share a room with three or five friends to save money or for convenience. In most cases, hotels will not ban it.

However, recently, some netizens posted that she and her parents went to Beijing to play, and when they checked in, they were told by the hotel that a family of three could not live in a standard room, which made her very suspicious.

Except for the registration of check-in personnel, the number of check-in personnel is not clearly defined. In general, a hotel room can be shared by many people, but there are restrictions on the number of people staying. The regulations of each hotel are different, and the specific occupancy limit is subject to the hotel regulations.

Since an adult family of three can't share a standard room, why can they live in a so-called "family room"? Is the difference just the size of the bed? It is said to be an industry regulation. Who issued their "General Regulations for Industry"? What is the basis? Is this a clear rule or a hidden rule? The hotel looks smart, but it tastes ugly. To put it bluntly, I just want to take the opportunity to collect more money. Why can't a family live in a standard room? Besides, when parents are old, their children should accompany them, and who is responsible in case something happens. The hotel has its own overlord clause. Such a hotel can't be persuaded or resisted.

Therefore, when checking into a hotel, it is best to consult the store in advance, so as not to affect the check-in and cause unnecessary trouble.