Substitute photographer

Recently, Yang Mi's malicious shooting on the set was once again on the hot search list. In the picture, the shooting angle of the photographer from body double caused a heated discussion among netizens. Regardless of right and wrong, among the comments of netizens, there are also some strange voices that Yang Mi is wearing such a short freak lens.

Honey, listen to this classic? The victim is guilty? Theory, and then think back to the murder of Didi, the same group of people who speak for women's wear, have they been screaming wildly? You deserve to wear less? Always a group of people? As an absolute passerby, even if malicious shooting is a kind of hype, but like this? Victim theory? This also makes me very angry!

When is it a mistake to be victimized? When, when we evaluate something, our first reaction is not to blame the perpetrator, but to find fault with the victim? According to these people's way of thinking, before trying the murderer, do you still need to bring the victim back to life and ask him by pointing his nose? Why did he kill you instead of others? ?

How ridiculous. It's none of your business. Hang high? Speech, how dark a person's heart is, can spit out such irresponsible words from his mouth, what's more, Yang Mi wears less? In fact, Yang Mi's dress was really normal for me on the day of being shot maliciously! When she was photographed, she even covered her bare legs with a coat. Can you blame Yang Mi for this dress?

What's more, can you even tell the truth? Do public figures gain or lose? In fact, it is not normal for Yang Mi to earn so much money. People are called people because they should have a moral bottom line and a code of conduct. What about public figures? Public figures should also have their own privacy and civil rights. We can accuse public figures of cheating and bring bad public opinion guidance to the society, but we will never force a public figure not to wear shorts. The reason is that just because she is a public figure, she should be photographed wearing shorts!

We used to have a saying? People and dogs are not allowed in China? Angry again, and now these? The victim is guilty? Speech, why not use the same logic to try to subvert people's three views? I'm not a fan of Yang Mi. Even in my opinion, Yang Mi's acting skills are really full. But in this case, whether the media exaggerates the facts or the malicious photographer has no bottom line, it is impossible and should not be Yang Mi.

Back to the matter itself, we may guess that this so-called malicious shooting is just a little low angle. With what Yang Mi was wearing at that time, we couldn't produce any exposed pictures. We may even guess that this farce is just artificial hype to gain popularity and boost Yang Mi's new drama. But no matter how you guess, please keep the bottom line of being a man and don't let the victim's guilt theory pollute the world again.