What are the consequences of impoliteness of pedestrians at Weihai zebra crossing?

The car circle is very lively recently. First, the most stringent "Measures for the Administration of Automobile Sales" was officially promulgated, and then, the relevant departments strongly promulgated the most stringent "Measures for the Administration of Courtesy zebra crossings" in history.

In fact, the country has advocated comity zebra crossing for some time, but it seems that it is not enough to advocate it, so it has recently started to be punished directly. As long as it is not allowed, it will cost 30 cents and 200 yuan (fines vary in different regions), which can be described as a stone stirring up a thousand waves.

Some people applauded, some people questioned, and even our friends were completely divided into these two factions, and they were so quarrelsome that they simply tore themselves to a new height. ......

So let's discuss today, is this "comity zebra crossing" really so reliable, and can it improve the travel quality of Chinese people?

In real life, people always like to compare with foreigners and ask "What about foreigners?" I believe there are such people around you, so let's start with foreign systems.

At present, we know the following situations. The first is that there is a signalized intersection, a red light stops and a green light goes, which is the same for everyone; Second, when there is a signal light, pedestrians and turning vehicles are green at the same time, and the car is letting people; In the third case, where there is no signal light, pedestrians crossing the zebra crossing are also cars; The fourth situation is when there is a signalized intersection, pedestrians are red and vehicles are green, and people are waiting for the bus, regardless of whether they take the zebra crossing.

On the other hand, in China, where there are traffic lights, everyone is generally more disciplined, but when there are no traffic lights or the green lights of pedestrians and vehicles overlap, it is simply a table of mahjong tiles. ......

In order to build a harmonious society, it is decided that people should not be fined 200 points for driving, but this set of regulations is pointed out by most people as overkill, because in the regulations, even if pedestrians run red lights, vehicles must be polite as long as they are on the zebra crossing.

This can make the majority of drivers and friends stamp their feet! To this end, I also deliberately chose the weekend. When there are many people traveling, I drove out to simulate it, and the following situation appeared. ...

Some people stand in front of the zebra crossing and make phone calls. The traffic is polite, pedestrians don't walk, and the speakers behind them are crazy. ...

Others rushed directly from the roadside to the zebra crossing without giving the driver reaction time. ...

A pedestrian was about to leave when a poor driver honked his horn and stepped on the gas pedal to scare the pedestrian back. ...

When the green lights of vehicles and pedestrians overlap, they suddenly change from green lights to red lights. Pedestrians were driven crazy by honking their horns behind them before they finished walking. ...

There are also Chinese-style roads that are crowded and powerful, from a green light to a red light. ...

Anyway, basically all the situations that can be encountered have been encountered. Now let's talk about our views on this "comity zebra crossing" regulation.

Let's start with the bright side. The starting point of this regulation is really good, which can effectively curb unscrupulous old drivers. It can be called a shot in the arm to build a harmonious society!

From the perspective of pedestrians, we fully support the implementation of this set of regulations. Pedestrians have absolute right of way on zebra crossings, and vehicles must be courteous, which is also in line with international standards.

But back to the driver's position, this set of regulations does have many unreasonable or can be improved. For example, considering the complicated road conditions, impolite pedestrians can complain when they are punished.

For example, as mentioned above, passers-by use mobile phones in front of zebra crossings. I told him not to leave, and he was fined for leaving. How to solve this situation? For example, in the section with zebra crossing and no signal light, pedestrians suddenly jumped out of the roadside and the driver ran into it before he could react. How to divide responsibilities? These are all possible on the road. Should we also add some subsidiary regulations to improve this set of regulations?

What is unreasonable is that pedestrians should be polite when they run red lights. Pedestrians and non-motor vehicles are always listed as vulnerable groups, but they turn a blind eye to the illegal activities of vulnerable groups. Can weak reasoning really improve the quality of the people?

Usually in the absence of traffic police on the road, motor vehicles are the only group that will be subject to legal supervision. Now they will be punished even if they don't "condone" non-motor vehicle violations. Who are the disadvantaged groups?

Vehicles and pedestrians are part of the whole traffic environment and should be treated equally. No matter whether the rules are the strictest in history, if only one party is bound and the other party's mistakes are ignored, then no matter how strict the rules are, there is no way to improve the whole environment.

Finally, I have something to say to pedestrians. If the vehicle stops to give way to you, you should also consider each other and cross the zebra crossing as soon as possible. Don't play with your mobile phone when you walk. Politeness is mutual, not unilateral and unlimited.

Similarly, if a driver should be polite but doesn't, or has an argument with the driver for this reason, you can pick up the weapon given to you by law, photograph his license plate number and let the traffic police slap him in the face!

What do you think of this? Do you support this move? Passers-by should enjoy absolute right of way. Or are you against this move? It's hard to judge whether it's polite or not. There are too many questions. Or, like us, support this initiative, but remain skeptical about some of its contents and hope to improve it?