10 reasonable 200-word composition materials

Travel far, climb high and feel inferior.

The Doctrine of the Mean says that a gentleman's way, if he travels far, must follow you; For example, if you climb high, you will feel inferior. It means that a gentleman's way is like walking a long way, letting people know that they are "from you", that is, knowing that they are only a comparison between "near" and "far". A gentleman's way is like climbing a very high mountain, which makes people know that they are "inferior", that is, they know that they are only "humble" (not high) compared with "high". Climbing high will make you feel inferior, and walking far will make you feel inferior. This sentence has been passed down to this day and is remembered by people. It tells us that no matter what we do, we should be down-to-earth, step by step towards success and complete our mission.

In our daily study and life, we are engaged in various activities and behaviors. We acquire the knowledge we need and improve ourselves through continuous cognitive learning, so as to achieve ideal results in the competition. But many times when we are frustrated, have we ever thought about the factor that the goal is too high among many reasons for failure?

Achieving the success of a process is a correct way to persevere. First of all, we need to examine our goals and have a correct understanding of them. Secondly, we will re-examine ourselves and objectively and calmly evaluate our own strength. Third, formulate policies and strategies and implement them. Finally, correct execution and normal procedures make us successful. The above process is the process of making victory, and failure caused by violating this process is inevitable, so almost all failures violate one or more joints above to varying degrees. If we carefully examine the above contents, we will get a principle that makes the above process go smoothly, that is rationality and objectivity.

In fact, rationality and objectivity are both manifestations of inferiority when climbing high. "Inferiority" and "self-esteem" both refer to modesty and practicality, that is, to remain rational and act with a modest and hopeful heart, that is, to remain rational and objective. If we can see the goal carefully before doing things, we can see many aspects and multi-level requirements of the problem from different angles and methods, so that we can be more comprehensive and less narrow-minded when formulating methods. At the same time, as we see more and more difficulties and situations, we will naturally be more cautious when dealing with them. At the same time, when we know our situation, if we can keep a normal mind, we can also get an objective analysis of our own strength correctly. Only in this way can we know ourselves in the confrontation and know ourselves, and we can feel at ease. Then, in the concrete implementation, we refine our methods and strategies with the attitude that climbing high will make us feel inferior and walking far will make us satisfied, so that we can succeed calmly and humbly. Presumably this is the way of a gentleman, such as traveling far, we will be self-satisfied; For example, if you climb high, you will feel inferior. "Its core.

Climbing high will make you feel inferior, and walking far will make you feel inferior. Look at the road with an upward attitude, and we will gain more.

Let me talk about what I think needs attention. As I said just now, argumentative writing should convince people with reasoning, right? Then convince people by reasoning, how can people convince you? I think you are right to let him serve you, but you don't care who will serve you? How can people think that you are right? You should use materials to prove your point of view, and there must be a strict causal relationship between your materials and your point of view. When you use every material, even when you write down every sentence, you should consider: can this lead to that result? Because of what, so what, consider this; Can I write this with causality? You have to think about this. Let me make a simple analogy to prove that two triangles are congruent, or add an angle to both sides, or add an edge to both angles. Angle A equals angle AP, angle B equals angle BP, and AB equals AB, so the two triangles are congruent. You wrote this, which is very useful to prove this conclusion. I found that some students write compositions, so I still use this metaphor. The angle is 36 degrees, and the angle is BP7 1 degree. What does this have to do with triangular congruence? It's okay, it's okay. Why did you write it? We haven't paid enough attention to this. This is a problem in argumentative writing.

Many of our classmates have the habit of writing. Give me an opinion and I'll give you an example, two examples and three examples right away. Is there any reason? It's gone. Some students are more, four cases and five cases, only writing proofs, not argumentative papers. Arguments, arguments and proofs, no matter what line of work you are in. Of course, fact-finding is a method, but only a method. It's not easy to convince people if you only use this. When some of our classmates write hard work and plain living, Zhang San is hard work and plain living, Li Si is hard work and plain living, and Wang Wu is hard work and plain living, so we should be hard work and plain living. Why? This is why we need it. Can you convince people of this article? Some of us now, including some who are engaged in natural science, are really not interested in some doctors. The United States does this, Japan does this, and Britain does the same, so we should do this. Who said that? Are the national conditions the same? What's the reason? Many countries do this. Of course, I have no objection to you describing it as an experience. Is China's national conditions suitable? Why not start here? Learn to be reasonable. Well, the first big problem I want to talk about is to change from simple examples to reasoning with examples. For example, reasoning combined with this example, I will use this example. We should learn to master this method. When the example is finished, I will talk about it immediately, so that this example can better serve to prove the point. And what I said by analyzing this example is also to better serve the point of view and tie this case tightly. To do this, or in other words, don't you act as an agent? Replace truth with examples? All right, now let's be reasonable. This is very important.

Next, I think I'll take the composition of my colleagues as an example to talk about how to reason with examples. Tell me a few ways. The first method, I call it hypothetical causality. That is to say, in hypothetical language, tell the causal relationship between things so that people can obey you. I'd like to give you an example first. Listen to it.

In order to invent a new drug, Ollie insisted on the experiment, but failed. He tried 606 times before he succeeded and made a new drug named after the number of experiments. Some of our classmates may end up at the bottom when they write here. "From this perspective, sticking to the end is victory." It should be said that this example can be said and proved, but I think it is not enough. Why not analyze this example more? All right, let's keep listening. "The advent of new drugs is the result of persistence. If Olesi only experimented once and gave up after failing, of course, no new drugs would come out. That is, he experimented for 605 times, and after failing, he stopped insisting. There is no way to make a new drug. It was because he persisted in the end that he won the final victory. So it can be said that persistence in the end is victory. "

Do you think it is hypothetical and imaginary if he stops after only one experiment? Then, a hypothetical analysis, of course, has a most basic requirement. Everyone should pay attention to: a hypothetical analysis is that the example you cited is positive, so you should make a hypothetical analysis from the opposite side; The example you gave is a negative example, so you should make assumptions from the front. The basic requirement, because it is hypothetical, is called hypothetical causality. Right? In hypothetical language, this is the first way.

Next, I'm going to talk about the second method, which is called stretching method. You gave an example, didn't you? Is this example an argument? From this argument, you may see some signs, some signs, and then you use this sign to extend it, that is, you see the signs. From this example, you can imagine some kind of result, and you can extend in that direction. So what is the difference between it and the hypothetical causality, or what is the difference? It is in this example that we can see some signs. Is this a complete hypothesis? They didn't stop, not the first time, not the 605th time. What I'm going to talk about next is this example, and there is a sign. Ok, let me start with this example.

Miao xian is very open-minded. He discovered Lin Xiangru's talent and virtue. He didn't look down on him because of his humble background, but he was not afraid of being laughed at by ministers. He recommended Lin Xiangru to the Prince of Zhao and was able to go to the State of Qin. Lin Xiangru's good or bad luck is unpredictable. Brave and talented as he is, he may not win. If he went here and didn't exchange for Qin Cheng, even the "treasure shared by the world" was robbed by Qin, which humiliated Zhao's reputation. In a rage, the prince of Zhao may not only kill Lin Xiangru, but even Miao Xian will be implicated for recommending mediocrity. But Miao Xian is not afraid of this. He didn't dare to use it until he learned it. He trusted Lin Xiangru so much that he put his personal safety at risk. He resolutely recommended Lin Xiangru to the Prince of Zhao. If it is not out of concern for national affairs, it is difficult to do so.

Ok, this example, please look from here. "If you go here and don't change back to Qin Cheng, even the treasures of the world will be taken away by the king of Qin." Is this a signal? It's not a hypothesis that this treasure is lost, is it? Almost lost, signs appear, I will extend it. If this treasure is lost, I'm afraid Lin Xiangru is not alone. How did you recommend this big straw bag to me, Miao Xian? Inevitably, besides Lin Xiangru's murder, Miao Xian will also have bad luck. Miaoxian has no troubles, right? Recommend talents for public interests, starting from national interests, regardless of individuals. Did you make this clear by extension? More convincing, right? So the second method, which I call argument expansion, is that it has this symptom and this possibility.

The third method, I call it post-example explanation. This example explains how to use it. Where is it used? I want to remind everyone. You gave an example. When this example is very long, maybe you will have a worry: will others have a different understanding of this example center than me? You explain; Second, the example you gave is longer. Maybe you'll think about it. What does my example have to do with my point of view? Will others have a different understanding from me? Or I don't think my example is so closely related to what I want to say. At this point, you can explain this example. This example either explains what its center is or the relationship between this example and the center. Within this range, you can explain. Let me also use an example.

Once upon a time, there was a disease that made people lose their appetite and eventually led to death. At that time, it was almost incurable. There is a chemist who has the same disease. One day, he passed a village. When people in the village heard that he had the disease, they told him that there was a kind of divine water in our village, water from a well, which could cure your disease. The pharmacist listened, did it, drank the water and was fine. Well, the chemist thought: Why can this water save me? As a result, people in such a village never thought about it, prompting chemists to study it. Finally, the chemist found that the water contained mirabilite, which saved him, so he discovered the medicinal function of mirabilite.

You've heard the story. What is the center of this story? Are you clear? Maybe you thought of something. I use this. What do I want to prove? Okay, let's listen,

As the saying goes, "There is no doubt that there is doubt, and only then can we make progress" (Zhang Zaiyu in Song Dynasty). In the words of the ancients, if others don't doubt, you will have doubt and you will be one step ahead of others. People in the village knew that they could cure diseases, but they never thought about it. The chemist thought about it and found mirabilite. What did he say?

As the saying goes, "If there is doubt, you can enter" (Zhang Zaiyu in Song Dynasty). Doubt is the key to finding contradictions, and thinking and learning are the ways to solve contradictions. Discovering contradictions is the beginning of solving contradictions, and doubt is the end and beginning of thinking and learning.

One must be good at questioning. Only by being good at asking questions can we learn to think and finally solve problems. What I am talking about here is being good at questioning the relationship between learning and thinking, because if you are good at questioning, you will learn and think, which also implies that it is possible to get a final result. The purpose of my explanation is to illustrate this point. Well, this example can serve the center well.

The fourth method, I call it positive and negative contrast. When I say positive and negative contrast, I don't like the positive or negative examples in your composition, or I put the two examples together here. Of course, it is inevitable to give examples, because what I am talking about here is positive and negative contrast, two situations. One situation is that I may have a positive example and a negative example here. However, I am not just counting here. I want to analyze this example further. Or, let me give you an example, which contains both positive and negative factors. This example is over. I will make a comparative analysis from both positive and negative aspects, focusing on analysis instead of giving examples. Comparing one example with two to tell you it's over is not the same thing. Ok, I'll tell you with an article.

Sun Bin and Pang Juan came from Guiguzi's family. Both of them can be said to be skillful in strategy and rare talents. However, when Sun Bin came to Wei in Pang Juan, Pang Juan was jealous, respectful on the surface, and vicious in heart, and repeatedly slandered Wang Wei, so that Sun Bin was stripped of his kneecap and could not display his talents. However, turn to another aspect. Hearing that Sun Bin was very talented, the King of Qi spared no effort to invite Sun Bin to the State of Qi and entrusted him with an important task. The Qi army finally won the victory of Maling Road. Is the example over? What are you going to say? Do you want to say "a good collective will not bury talents"? But people didn't stop there. Let's do a comparative analysis. Here's the key.

As Sun Bin, why are there two situations in the end? Because he works for two ruling groups with their own advantages and disadvantages. Pang Juan of Wei is self-centered and jealous of talent, while Wang Wei is fatuous, partial to hearing and partial to believing, and lacks the Bole vision to identify a swift horse. Imagine how Sun Bin can display his ambition in such a collective. However, "He" appeared again and turned to the other side. And Ren Xian, the king of Qi, can use energy, and the officials around him don't abuse power for personal gain like Pang Juan, so Qi Xinhe and Sun Bin can give full play to their role here. It can be seen that a good collective will not bury talents.

You see, if it's just this example, what do you think of the comparative analysis effect of this case? Is it more convincing to analyze? Argumentative essay, argumentative essay, if you want to discuss, this is discussion.

I'd like to introduce another method by the way, not case analysis. By the way, what should I introduce? Our classmates also have a habit of writing compositions and like to quote famous sayings. So-and-so agreed and said what he meant, and it was over. So-and-so said that sentence, didn't his statement prove this truth? This proves the fact. So do you want to analyze what XXX said? I think it is necessary to analyze, not simply quote. Simple quotation is not good. Let me give you an example. What is this example for? I tell you, this method is called essay signing. Reveal a paragraph to explain its meaning. In the process of explaining the meaning of words, revealing the meaning of words makes this passage more convincing and can prove the point. Of course, explaining the meaning itself is also proving the point. Let me read you a song.

"It is common to have such people. They are always ashamed of themselves. I think, don't sell yourself short. " Has the opinion come out? It came out, "Russian writer Chekhov once said:" There are big dogs and puppies, but puppies don't need to be confused because of the existence of big dogs. Some of our classmates write compositions. Here, that's what Chekhov said. It's over. Can you be persuasive? No Well, listen to the following, people have a transition, "everyone is the same." There are big dogs and small dogs, just as there are capable, graceful and talented people in the world, there are also people who are slightly inadequate in all aspects. Things in the world are complicated and people in the world are more diverse, which is the result of natural selection. But puppies don't need to be confused by the existence of big dogs. Yes, the existence of a puppy has its own value and its own natural selection position. Why should we confuse the "small" with the "big"? Big dogs are brought up by small dogs. If the puppy is inferior, even if it grows into a big dog, it will be mediocre under the oppression of inferiority. What's more, the charm and superb performance skills of puppies are beyond the reach of large dogs. "

Everyone has heard it. Does it continue to extend the metaphor along the meaning of Chekhov's metaphor, isn't it? Let me tell you another example. After quoting this passage, some students said it in more straightforward language, not figuratively, but also said this truth.

Chekhov once said: "There are puppies and big dogs, but puppies don't need to be confused by the existence of big dogs." The puppy is a metaphor for those young people who are just starting, while the big dog is a metaphor for those old-timers who have a long reputation. Young people should respect the old-timers and learn from them modestly, but they should not sell themselves short. As Chekhov said, "Puppies don't need to be confused by the existence of big dogs." Some young people regard what their predecessors have said for many years as the golden rule, and dare not comment even if they are wrong. This practice can only make their thoughts stagnate and lack creative vitality. This phenomenon is particularly obvious in natural science and social science. The theory of the old-timers is regarded as the golden rule, and no one dares to raise objections. However, young people who really make achievements are always confident. They dared to challenge scientific authority and made achievements in their careers. Therefore, I advise you not to be arrogant, but to have your own opinions. "

Do you think this passage makes the truth clear in relatively straightforward words? "Don't be ashamed, don't sell yourself short, have your own opinions." People don't just say it's all quotes from celebrities. I think we should also learn this method, which will increase the persuasiveness of argumentative writing.

The second big question I want to talk about is whether we change our thinking and seek change and innovation. In other words, change your habitual thinking. Some students saw that this paper was given a material and immediately remembered something. But due to the lack of innovation, habitual thinking has played a role. I think we can change our thinking, one material and one topic. Do you want to think of many related aspects? I think you have related aspects. It might be better if you find a new aspect. Let me give you an example to illustrate this problem.

Take this idiom as an example to fill in the blanks. Did you immediately realize in your mind that Mr. Nanguo is not so good, making up figures, being ignorant and not striving for progress? But think about it, okay? I think there are new aspects to consider. The king of qi can think of, for example, is the king of qi pretending to be an expert? If he really knows music, he can't find squeaks in the band. He is not keen on hearing, doesn't know much about music, and is a layman. Well, since the topic is raised, leaders should strive to become experts, not only by power, but also by knowledge. Has this topic come out? Ok, let's think about a band of hundreds of people. Do we have to have a captain? Why didn't the captain find Mr. Nan Guo's voice so ugly? Well, improper employment, has this topic been found out again? Leading cadres should put people in a position suitable for him, let him give full play to his role, and especially don't let irresponsible people take charge of a certain job. Is this topic coming out again? When I say improper employment, I don't mean using Mr. Nan Guo. You are a bad captain, and you have a new topic. For example, can you find a topic from other members of the band? I can also check whether people around him can hear that Mr. Nan Guo doesn't play very well. Then why not expose it? "Captain, this southern comrade is not so good, he is a fool." Don't expose, get along well, well, it's not advisable for a good man, is it? Here comes another topic. I think this is what we need, multi-directional thinking and multi-association. I can see this in this material, I can see this, you can see this, see a new one, your composition is absolutely innovative. But I think our classmates sometimes lack this point, so we should consider it from a new angle. I can also teach you a practice method, anyone can. Class is only ten minutes. Three students and five students get together. I said a material, where you can write it. Well, after a few people talk about it, how about it? Is it an open mind? Inspire each other, I believe it will be helpful for you to expand your thinking in the past three months. This is called changing directional thinking into multi-directional thinking and seeking change.

Third, don't beg with a golden rice bowl. Alas, there are many of our classmates with golden rice bowls in their hands. This golden rice bowl is so valuable, but he begged, "Give some to the old man and some to his wife." You are really rich. What do I mean by rich? Many students are reasonable in their hands and have not consciously thought about it. "Teacher, how to make sense? I won't, how can I care so much? " Actually, you have plenty in your hand. So, how to change the phenomenon of begging with a golden rice bowl? I suggest that you comb your hair before the exam and see what you can use in the examination room as needed. Of course, you should also do a good job in pre-test training. Now, let's give some examples. What's your reason?

For example, you don't understand the principles of quantitative change and qualitative change. I learned this in politics class. Do argumentative essays in Chinese books sometimes say this? I did it. Such as the principle of quantitative change and qualitative change. Speak and write sincerely. In the past, people paid more attention to honesty, but honesty was not a good quality formed in one day, nor was it a social atmosphere formed in a short time. Speaking of honesty, some people don't pay much attention to honesty now. Didn't it really happen all of a sudden? It seems that the social atmosphere is not enough. Well, let's change from being too honest to being honest. As long as we work together, over time, the wind of honesty will blow strongly again. For example, from this perspective, is it quantitative change or qualitative change? Yes, keep it up. I also have a secret principle in it. Is there a static and dynamic principle in this? In other words, things are not static, they are always in motion, so one state can be changed into another. You can't either? Right? The college entrance examination focuses on rules. Some people are not very polite now. After our efforts, the atmosphere of speaking rules will rise again. I see that some rules are really out of date now, so we will change them, and I believe the new rules will be deeply rooted in the hearts of the people; Some rules may be completely out of date, so abolish them. There are other reasons for the relationship between stillness and motion, aren't there? I think there are many reasons: internal and external causes, causality, right? There are many reasons for the phenomenon and essence. There are many reasons in this regard, purposeful reasons, and means reasons ... You have so many reasons at hand that I think it is necessary to sort it out and braid it before the exam. In the examination room, I can talk about what I want to talk about when I talk about this matter, what I want to talk about when I talk about that matter, and what kind of reason I can. Well, isn't it great that you used it? Because I don't think it's necessary to give this example, I'll just say it in general. I suggest that you comb your hair before the college entrance examination, so that you can use it consciously during the exam. Of course, you can do more training in this area before the exam, so that you can definitely cope with it in the examination room. I wonder if you should do more work in this field.

Finally, I'll give you another suggestion. Read more good compositions before the exam, read more compositions with teachers' comments, and see what others have. I think it is exquisite. I think I suggest you look at it this way: first, look at the topic first; The second step, thinking, I want to write this, how do I write it; The third step is to compare and see how others write this composition, which is the third step; The fourth step is to analyze where other people's writing is better than mine, whether the writing I just thought is better than his, where his writing can be improved, and whether some places I just thought can be improved. Finally, you go to see the teacher's comments. What did the teacher say? The pros and cons of this article are as different as your comments on this article just now. Don't read a good article, just read it, read it and finish it; No, you should be able to read, if you read more articles, as I just said.

Winter vacation life X.

The month-long winter vacation life is coming to an end. Looking back this month, I feel that I have gained a lot.

During the winter vacation, I make full use of every day to enrich myself and spend my time in winter vacation life by reading books, magazines and surfing the Internet. Of course, the most meaningful thing is to understand the annual culture of China. China is a civilized country with a long history, and we never thought about getting to know it before the Spring Festival. In the past, we only spent time visiting relatives and friends, but this year, the form has changed a lot. People don't just stay at home, but invite some friends out to play. Speaking of this, I was particularly impressed, because I also went out to play with a few good friends this year, which was really comfortable, much better than visiting relatives and friends in the previous Spring Festival, and it was also very simple and convenient.

65438+1It was cold on Saturday, October 28th.

The joys and sorrows of the past are no longer so important, because a new year is coming. Today is New Year's Eve. Wherever you go, you can feel the warm atmosphere.

The Spring Festival is a happy day for the whole family. The reason why relatives also rushed to grandma's house to pay New Year greetings to the two old people. Today's meal is a grand feast! Good wine and good dishes are available, and you can eat whatever you want. While watching the Spring Festival party, I was enjoying delicious food. My grandfather told us something unforgettable in the past. The atmosphere of family reunion is certainly the same as your feelings. The women cleared the table and the others went out to set off firecrackers. When we got home, we had a family dinner. Divide into two groups, one playing poker and the other drawing. Grandpa's hand is a lucky hand. Whatever he wants, our money goes into grandparents' pockets one by one. In a short time, we losers lost all our money, but in the end we all gave it to us.

I kept telling the adults loudly that no one is allowed to sleep today, and whoever sleeps is a lazy pig. But it wasn't long before I fell asleep, fell asleep and looked at the promise just now. The most regrettable thing is to miss the delicious New Year's Eve dinner-jiaozi.

March/kloc-Monday, 0/4

Today, as usual, this flag is still raised. Ten years of cold window, whenever I see the bright red five-star red flag, Ran Ran rises. The fighting spirit in the heart will not be shattered, and the voice of victory will ripple in the ear. When you don't want to study, reflect on how hard it is to be in high school today. If you don't cherish them, they will never come back. Life in senior one makes me love reading more. Reading is a kind of precipitation, and writing is a kind of sublimation. Read the true meaning of life and write the value of life. Life likes people who don't bow to difficulties, and there is always a stubborn heart that dares to challenge the limits. Failure is not terrible, but being knocked down. Lonely I am full of helplessness and helplessness. Although I am no longer perfect, I can do my best in my own defects.

March/kloc-Friday, 0/8

Today is the last day of physical exercise, so we should do more exercise. I got up a little late in the morning, and it was almost 6 o'clock when I got to school, so I ran five laps to warm up. Maybe everyone has their own strengths, and my confidence is my great honor. The PE teacher has great expectations for our class. In the experience of life, no matter what you do, as long as you try your best, even if you fail, you have no regrets. When a person is lonely, walking into a crowded street is a protest against excessive freedom? Or complain about this ridiculous earth? When a person encounters pain, he presses a wound that is difficult to heal. After all, we must work hard and not slip away silently. No one understands my sadness. I look forward to someone who will let me hold your hand tightly, wander together, fantasize about the good times together, and grow old together. Although I am far away from you, you know my confusion. I can't find naive laughter from my memories, and I can't keep the frustrated struggle of New China. Long after the Chinese New Year, suddenly looking back, it's still the same.

-