How to change from a paper tiger to a real tiger

I can't bear to see the flood of saliva hitting an innocent farmer who has made great contributions to the investigation of wild South China tigers. So, at the weekend, I hastily registered a blog with my real name on Sina (unfortunately, my name has been occupied by others, so I had to add the suffix 1964). As a journalist and a government official, if I dare to register my blog with my real name to express my views (in my own name), I am frank and fearless. Because I'm here to explore the truth.

Please understand that I was forced to shut down the comment channel of "Restoring Zhou Zhenglong to Shoot the Wild South China Tiger Scene" for a whole day, when the number of readers just exceeded 1000. Yes, I'm here to help innocent farmers get water, but I'm really not used to the words and ways cursed by those who hide in dark corners. It's not helpful to explore the truth, so I'd better leave my ears alone.

The reason probably comes from the animation on the website of Color Shadow Unlimited, which superposes three tiger photos with different prospects. The tiger is not moving, but the foreground is moving-if it is not a paper tiger, what is it? Congratulations to the author of this animation. Your genius and creativity have blinded many good people's eyes, but your PS technique is not very clever. There are two images that are almost the same as watercolors. Technically, it is easy to turn a real tiger into a paper tiger. Ps only takes three or five steps, but to turn a paper tiger into a real tiger, you have to rely on PS. However, the operator neglected a detail, so that he concocted a nondescript "paper tiger" with changeable facial expressions, but his body was as stiff as cardboard. Thanks to the support of netizen "Yang Mo", we also made an animation to imitate it, and declared that the tiger in the image was never stretched, so we saw a lifelike "real tiger". This netizen's words are thought-provoking: DX people here are all one-sided, saying that tigers are fake, which reminds me of the past ten years. ...

The scientist came out next. A leader of the Chinese Academy of Sciences with a high academic status compared his head to an old farmer in a corner of a mountain. This gamble has been known from the beginning. Unfortunately, this farmer is based on his own personal experience, while this domineering scientist is based on several digital photos that are widely spread on the Internet and blurred after cutting.

I am a journalist with a sense of justice. 12 years ago, I once published a critical report under great pressure and won the highest honor in China journalism-the China Prize for Journalism. Coincidentally, what I exposed that time was also an incident involving wild animals.

I am also a professional nature photographer, so I know more about ecology, animals and plants. I am willing to stand up for Mr. Zhou Zhenglong who risked his life to photograph wild South China tigers! Zhou Zhenglong is not afraid of death, and neither am I!

It's unfair to risk your life and throw so many "toilets" and "urinals" at an ordinary farmer who has made great contributions to the national scientific investigation! Hit me if you want!

I also want to ask some colleagues who are obviously discriminated and biased. Where have you lost your sense of responsibility and conscience? Our team will be ashamed of you!