Traditional Culture Encyclopedia - Photography major - Is Nikon 80-400 lens worth entering?

Is Nikon 80-400 lens worth entering?

If it is the generation of 80-400, forget it. It is not recommended. However, if it is the second generation product of Nikon 80-400, it is still very worth recommending!

About your question, it can be roughly analyzed as follows:

1.70-200mmF2.8 is the most commonly used lens for professional portrait shooting.

Studio, photography studio, news photography, children's photography, 70-200mmF2.8 are very common shots.

Second, if you are not a professional portrait photographer, you are a photography enthusiast and photographer.

Tourism photography, natural scenery, flower photography, ecological photography, not often taking portraits.

Then, 70-300 or 100-400 or 80-400 suits you better.

Third, if the economy is tight, it is enough to buy a 7000-plus 700.

Fourth, if the money is not bad, Canon 100-400 or Nikon 80-400 is the first choice.

5. If it was many years ago, I might not like recommending 100-400 or 80-400 very much.

But now Canon and Nikon have upgraded this lens.

Canon 100-400 second-generation upgrade is sincere and macro performance is good.

The upgrade of Nikon 80-400mm second generation is still very good.

Nikon's old model, 80-400mm, has poor autofocus performance and poor snapshot ability.

Look at everyone's needs, as long as you feel good. I have used it for several years, and it feels good.

I think you are an ordinary photographer. If you are still young, it is no problem to play a SLR. I think you can use a 24- 120, a second-generation 80-400, a 35mm 1-4, and you can use 80-400 to attack and defend. It's not small to shoot a big movie when traveling.

This is a good start with medium telephoto, but the price line is more expensive. Remember to buy the second generation, the first generation is not an ultrasonic motor. This lens has a good performance in humanities, scenery, sports and bird shooting, and it is light and easy to carry. It's just that the aperture is a little smaller, but a machine with high sensitivity is suitable. Of course, the focal length of a pure bird shot is slightly shorter, but it is enough.