What are the advantages and disadvantages of Canon, Sony, Samsung, Fuji, Nikon and Panasonic cameras?

Canon, exquisite imaging, true color, general distortion, high price and good design;

Sony, the picture quality is acceptable, and the lens of Zeiss is dignified in color, rich in functions and beautiful in appearance (T series is beautiful, but the slider will be scratched and ugly when used for a long time).

Samsung's color is simple and elegant, and its imaging is still delicate. Schneider's lens color is Leng Yan, and the resolution is good, so the design is above average.

Fuji is elegant in color, better controls people's skin color, has fewer functions, and the product design is not very good. But exr technology is a bright spot.

Nikon gives people the impression that the picture quality is sharp, the color is bright, the performance is good, and the design is relatively dull. And the card machine is not careful enough.

Panasonic's products are relatively stable, with acceptable image quality and more noise, but they have been improving. Leica lens is its sharp weapon, conservative in design, but quite solid, unlike Nikon Fuji, which has a heavy plastic feeling. There are no high-end products.

Casio has good cost performance, but slow response, acceptable design and plain color. In short, all aspects are moderate and have no personality.

In terms of sensory quality, Canon Nikon is better than Samsung Sony Fuji Panasonic Casio.

Design: Sony Canon Panasonic Casio Samsung Nikon Fuji

In fact, this comparison does not make much sense. Just need to understand the brand concept, a big factory has been upgrading. For example, after Sony used R cmos, the sensitivity soared and the picture quality was fine.

In the sensory card machine

Sony is more fun and the picture quality is ok.

Canon improves the appearance and playability of products on the premise of ensuring excellent imaging performance.

Nikon card machine is not as hard as SLR and professional portability, but SLR is very good.

Panasonic and Casio are relatively stable, but Panasonic is more mature in product usability. Of course, some slag cameras have also been introduced for market demand. Many professional photographers like to use Panasonic or lx series cameras. The professionalism of its concept can be seen, and the Casio market is relatively stable, which can be seen from the moderation of its performance, design and pursuit of cost performance.

Samsung has always wanted to pursue development, and its ambition is not lost to Sony. Therefore, the old products are imaged well, and the new products have not been used, so we dare not talk nonsense.

Buy a card or something, Sony for fun, Panasonic for professional taste, Canon for higher pursuit, and a camera. You can buy Casio without asking.