Is it necessary for Nikon SLR users to change micro orders?

The D 8 10 SLR used by the photographer is not bad, and there are still a bunch of SLR mirrors in his hand, so there is no need to follow the trend for the time being. The Z7II mirrorless camera is not bad, but it is very good. If you have to pay attention to the video and the budget is not an issue, then replace it.

If you like playing with equipment, don't consider going directly to Z 9 with Z 7II. One step in 5- 10 years is enough. To tell the truth, if I were you, I would replace D8 10 with D850 and continue to use it, that is to say, upgrade the Japanese top SLR fuselage with 6000-8000.

Kill Nikon SLR and SLR lens, and reopen Z-series mirrorless cameras and Z-mount lens, which requires you to calculate an account. How much did you lose? How much did you spend on mirrorless cameras and cameras?

The conclusion is "not necessary for the time being". Reason: They all take pictures, and no one loses the image quality. It is more reasonable to change the lens of D850. There is no need to upgrade thousands of dollars into tens of thousands.

Digital camera, try to use it! No need to change!

Get a new one, follow the crowd and meet the psychological requirements. There is no obvious improvement in reality! I once sold a Sony NEX_7 miniature camera at a low price! Added money for Sony a6400. After the comparison, the old and the new have not improved much.

Sorry, I don't know much about Nikon and micro-single.

Canon series I have been using. (? з( c)

It varies from person to person.

I'm in my fifties. When I was young, I liked art, photography and playing with film machines. However, in that era, printing was completely out of our control, and the camera became a record and was gradually forgotten. 14 years, my friend started Nikon SLR and encouraged me to into the pit. At that time, there were Nikon and Canon to choose from, thinking that Nikon could spend less money to enjoy the lens, so we started with the D600 and Quan Huafu entry-level models. At that time, D800 was not chosen, because it was expensive and not as important as the lens. A fuselage may be changed in a few years, and a classic good head can last at least ten years. But then I met the D600 slag door and began to regret it. I can only replace D6 10 (it is not allowed to add money to replace D8 10). The lens is equipped with 24-70 and 70-200, and the total price is more than 30 thousand, so I have been playing. Time is limited. Traveling on go on road, taking beautiful photos of your wife and sending friends are all SLR. D850 was very moved after it went on the market! However, at that time, the micro-single (not reverse) has already begun to exert its strength. After visiting various forums, I feel that the biggest advantage is that I am light and focused, and I can wait.

With the launch of Nikon Z7 II and the gradual enrichment of Z-mount lens group, I think it's time to change. I'm ready to wait for the price, but I don't know that the price of chip shortage is rising instead of falling. Haha, keep waiting. Expected configuration: the second or third generation Z7, and the legendary Z8 (I didn't intend to shoot birds, so Z9 didn't consider it, although it smells good! ) Z port 14-24f2.8, 70-200f2.8 or 100-400f4, and hang up 24- 120f4.

Change if you have money, and watch if you don't have money! In the era of national photography, the camera is a toy after all, and spending so much money is also a toy for self-entertainment. What's the point of taking pictures? What's the value? The so-called blockbusters are beautiful rubbish at best. How many photos can make men angry and women cry? A few photographers can take more photos than Project Hope in Jie Hailong, and make caring people at home and abroad donate more than 2 billion yuan for Project Hope.

Stick to SLR.

I don't think it is necessary to change it. There are two cameras (D8 10 and D750) at hand, which only take photos, not videos. Plus, I'm over 60 years old, and I'm too lazy to toss and turn. It just takes energy, time and money to get used to it. I have to consider whether the microcomputer is really better than the SLR. What about the rest of the SLR lens and a bunch of equipment?

If I were 10 and 8 years old, I might try it. At this age, forget it.

It costs 3,000-5,000 yuan a year to use the camera, which can be packaged and sold to novices at low prices:

It was just a heavy loss, and all the equipment was discounted by 34%.

1)D8 10 is the older generation of flagship machine, and two years of pixels are basically enough.

2) It is suggested that the price of z7II should be reduced to 1.5 million-1.6 million yuan in one or two years. As a backup model, the old camera is still enough.

The equipment in the landlord's hand is already ultra-luxury configuration. This means that you are an old hand. If you toss around here, there are many conversion problems.

The original lens is left in the fuselage for sale. Switch to Z72. What has been added is the eye-controlled focusing without anti-fuselage and the enhancement of video function. And the heart attack that wasn't the original shot.

Second, sell them all and replace them with Z-series bodies and lenses. If it makes you feel better. The gain is outweighed by the loss.

Has the 8 10 fuselage been upgraded to 850? It depends on your interest and enthusiasm. I will buy another 850 fuselage. Enjoy the top focusing technology of Nikon SLR and the scene recognition system with 654.38+0.8 million pixels. The body pixel is as high as 45.75 million. Higher pixels, personal storage will be difficult.