How to evaluate the head of Kangtaishi g45? Is it a little flattered to compare it with Leica's legendary header?

Without too much praise, Leica lens is called reference lens, which means that the comprehensive quality of Leica lens can be used as the reference standard of standard lens, including optical quality, resolution, color, Jiao Wai, glare and so on.

The best thing about G45 is its optical quality. The top title test of Hasselblad Lab was very popular in that year (in fact, a foreign photography magazine "Bian Xiao" used Hasselblad's testing equipment to test a bunch of shots and gave corresponding equal parts, but it became the so-called Hasselblad Lab in China). If I remember correctly, G45 scored 4.5 points, ranking third. But G45 is an eccentric lens, and its optical quality is mainly reflected in the resolution. Although this lens was born almost 20 years ago (/kloc-0 came out in 1996), it still performs well at the 40-megapixel resolution of A7R2. Even this 40-megapixel resolution has not completely squeezed out its resolution limit, and it can even be comparable to Zeiss FE55/ 1.8 in resolution.

According to the resolution, hair color, color difference, Jiao Wai and so on, judge the best photo. G45 is too abnormal in resolution, just like Jin Yong's Sweeping Monk of Shao Lin is the strongest, and all 72 stunts are perfect. Only the swordsman can compete with him, but you can't fight without a gun, a stick and a fist, you can only break it with one sword, so both of them are excellent masters. The relationship between G45 and Leica's traditional header is similar. Do you still think the evaluation of G45 is overrated?