The crew of "Black Storm" paid for the opening material. Do you think this is plagiarism?

Not plagiarism. The crew spends money on the platform, and then the platform authorizes others. Here's the story. A friend of Gao claimed to be the original creator, and then uploaded this material in his own name. Then the anti-gang group bought this non-original material on this platform and used it in the credits list. The result was discovered by the original creator!

After carefully reading the two groups of contrast pictures, we can basically determine that the difference is the same picture, that is, the data such as color temperature are different. If we can further find out that the scene involved in the picture is in an old house in Taihu County, and the netizen has not signed a copyright license contract with a third party, we can basically conclude that there is a fact of copyright infringement. At present, the film's response is that the opening and ending of the play are commissioned by a third-party film and television company. If infringement is involved, the company will coordinate with the filming party.

This website likes to connive at the uploaders stealing videos and selling them for profit. When accused, the defendant threw out the original statement of the so-called uploader to clear his responsibility. Many friends and colleagues around him have the same experience of being violated. This website is already a recidivist. You can check how many similar lawsuits it is conducting online. As for the relevant production companies, they claim to have more than 20 years of experience in film and television production, but they completely ignore the poor reputation of the platform website in the industry and buy commercial materials for large-scale projects at a much lower price than normal. It is completely irresponsible and reasonable to say that it is completely irresponsible.

As an outsourcer, outsourcers will not check them one by one. If you follow the normal process and open a credit to the material website, everything is legal and compliant. As for your material uploaded by the author himself or authorized by the original author twice, our company is not an artificial intelligence scanner, and there are thousands of materials on the material website. How can I check them one by one? I can only guarantee that your material website is marked with the author's authorization, and I will pay for it.

In view of the fact that the video involved in the case accounts for a small proportion at the beginning of the film, if the infringement is established, there is a cooperative relationship between the film side, the third-party film and television company and the platform authorized to play the video, which may constitute the same infringement. According to legal standards, the compensation amount can be determined within a certain proportion by referring to the remuneration agreed in the entrustment contract between the third-party film and television company and the film company. Of course, if the parties reach a settlement agreement separately, it will be determined according to the settlement situation, and the amount will generally not be made public.