Is it correct to say that photography depends first on creativity, second on technology and finally on equipment?

The reason why a master is a master is that his works are thoughtful, mainly because he can capture the hearts of the audience on the theme of expression. He has never heard of a master discussing equipment.

Professional photographers rely on technology and ideas, but they are not as profound as masters. They can only rely on technology, composition, lighting and color matching. These are well done, and a good work can also impress the audience.

Photographers without ideas and skills will rely on equipment, but relying on equipment may not necessarily produce good works. The less they pay attention to ideas and technology, the worse their works will be. I've never heard of any expert who can talk about equipment.