Is the Nikon d60 camera with 70-300 lenses worth it?

Nikon's lenses have always been a bit expensive, but it's worth getting what you pay for. Although I had hoped that it would have more surprises in terms of image quality.

This lens is FX lens. Even if the D700 or other full film or film is changed, this lens can still be used.

Want VR, this focal segment only has more than 10,000 70-200VR and this 70-300VR.

I think convenience is the value of 70-300. Nikon rarely has a telephoto lens that is smaller and lighter in the whole lens. If you take the whole picture, you should either accept the weight of 70-200 or 80-200, or buy an old lens of 70-2 10 from the 1980s and 1990s, or you should be a deputy factory or a fixed focus. Only 70-300VR takes into account the relative compactness, performance, technology, zoom and convenience. If one day you really start to use some high-end cameras and lenses, you will soon find that the heavy burden on you is killing your enthusiasm for photography.

For the use of D60, the main problem is that D60 is too light. After the lens is installed, you will feel top-heavy, the camera will fall down, and it will feel bad to use, but you will get used to it.

Attach a page of 100% comparison chart of 70-300VR and 55-200VR DX.

/reviews/Nikkor _ 70-300mm _ VR/outdoor _ results . shtml

Mind you, there are three types of Nikon 70-300 on the market now. One is 70-300G, which is a Nikon lens made by Longteng. The Nikon version is worse than the Longteng version, so it is 700 won. One is 70-300D, which is a little more expensive, thousands, and the picture quality is relatively better. Then there is the 70-300VR you are looking for. The image quality and focusing speed are better than the above two. Go directly to red VR. Generally speaking, it can't be wrong, but I remind you not to be fooled by those increasingly rampant market swindlers.

There is also the probability that telephoto is used less than you think. Unless you like shooting people or birds from a distance.

Talk a little more about personal feelings.

As for the whole picture you said, I suggest not to worry. Not everyone needs a complete picture. Many professional photographers use DX cameras because of their weight or the need for a coefficient of1.5x. Is the picture quality really so much better than DX? Here are a set of 100% screenshots of D3 and D90 for your reference:

/Nikon /d90/sharpness-comparison.htm

Quan Huafu's biggest advantage over DX is its high ISO quality:

/Nikon /d90/iso-3200.htm

Many professional photographers don't care about this difference. . . At least for me, this difference in image quality is fundamentally asymmetrical with the difference of 20 thousand yuan. A good camera is expensive mainly because of its reliability, handle and firmness, which is why the image quality of D90 is obviously better than that of D300, but the price is cheaper. For professionals, especially photojournalists, the success rate of shooting and the degree of camera fidelity under difficult conditions are more important than the image quality. This is why so many Olympic journalists choose120000 pixel D3 and D300 instead of 2 10/00000 pixel/ds.

For ordinary people like us, even if I enter the 10,000-yuan mark, I don't need the whole picture. If I do, it's not because of the price. Because I think the D90 in my hand has basically reached the limit that I can take pictures happily. No matter how heavy things are, it is bitter to carry them when going out to play.

Many fake experts and real rich people in China like to compare equipment. It's a ridiculous expression of vanity and self-distrust. Real photographers decide equipment according to their own needs, rather than letting the price of equipment decide whether they are professional or not.

I suggest you have more money to focus on lenses. After comparison, you will know how much the lens affects the image quality. And a well-made lens can accompany you for a lifetime. Whether or not the whole picture is changed in the future, the lens is the same. So I think when I'm not sure whether to change the fuselage or not, it's better not to change it first and invest all my money in the lens. The most important thing is to take more photos and practice more.

good luck