Did Apollo 1 1 really land on the moon?

Whether Apollo 1 1 really achieved manned landing on the moon has been questioned, but it has not been proved so far. Fake moon landing? Authoritative evidence is public, so in principle we think it is true.

So what are the specific doubts?

1. Apollo showed it? Manual soft landing? The controversial Apollo 1 1 was later satirized. Studio landing on the moon? To a great extent, there is a detail in the Apollo moon landing video, which has caused great controversy.

Which detail is it?

Was it 1 1 when Apollo landed on the moon? 100% soft landing? Yes!

You know, even today, 50 years later, the most advanced Chang 'e V landing on the moon can't be realized? Only when the lunar module descends to a certain height and remains suspended can a complete soft landing be achieved. then what Dong? Land? An ass? Sitting on the moon table.

The most ridiculous thing is that Apollo 1 1 was used. Transistor computer? Its computing power may not be as good as it is now? Smart rice cooker? Stronger, almost equal to? Astronaut manual control? Yes

Chang 'e V is equipped with 28nm technology and even more advanced computer chips. Can't this be done? 100% soft landing? Could Apollo 1 1 50 years ago have done this?

This point is unconvincing without clear explanation.

2. There is no floating soil around Apollo 1 1 landing site. In the live broadcast of Chang 'e V landing on the moon, the staff of Chang 'e project team paid attention to the lunar rover intentionally or unintentionally. A leg? Gave a close-up.

Interested netizens must remember, in the picture? Chang 'e leg? Almost completely buried in the soil. This means that there is a thick layer of sand on the surface of the moon, called? Floating soil? .

The eluvial soil on the surface of the moon is formed after hundreds of millions of years of weathering, and it is all over the surface of the moon. After years of research on the moon, this has already become the most basic common sense of academic circles and astronomy enthusiasts.

Unfortunately, however, in? Pioneer on the moon? Before Apollo 1 1 landed on the moon, humans did not understand such common sense.

At the foot of Apollo 1 1 lunar rover, there is almost no floating soil, but solid hard soil, and there is no floating soil around it.

Is this one too? Apollo 1 1 manned moon landing? One of the important reasons for being questioned.

The conclusion is the same? The national flag does not float? 、? The shadow angle is not normal? These suspects who want to muddy the water have different suspects. 100% soft landing? And then what? No aggradation? These details are highly hard-core academic doubts. The former can't explain anything, but the latter is fascinating. Is it confidential? Yes

Apollo 1 1 has been considered as? Man's first moon landing plan? But personally, I think it is inappropriate to give it such a high reputation before many related doubts are clarified.