In the field of film and television, do you prefer film and television reviews or mixed editing? Why?

Because you don't define a value framework, it is not conducive to comparison. People generally make choices according to their own needs. Therefore, I can't say which type I prefer, because they are not in the same dimension.

It's like someone asking you, "Do you like taking pictures with a camera or taking photos?" In fact, this is a difficult question to answer, because generally we just make choices according to our own needs, rather than talking about which one we like better. However, if you define a value framework, such as "You prefer to use a set of pictures or photography or lens to show the scenery here", then there is room for discussion.

Similarly, if this question is changed to "Do you prefer film commentary or mixed editing for the publicity effect of a film? Why? " This may have more room for discussion.

Film and television reviews are generally small videos composed of the author's personal views and opinions on a film, the author's words, the film's lens clips and so on.

As the saying goes, "For every 1000 readers, there will be 1000 Hamlet". What is shown in the same movie will be very different because of the reader's life experience, environment, knowledge, age and many other factors. It is precisely because of this that when we watch TV commentary videos, we are experiencing other people's perspectives and feeling the experience of people who are completely different from your life trajectory on the same movie.

Therefore, film and television commentary belongs to folk propaganda, which is often suitable for you to understand other people's perspectives after watching the movie alone and forming your own feelings; From the perspective of film promotion, it often increases the user's viscosity and makes the film get deeper promotion and publicity.

The mixed editing of film and television depends entirely on the editor's grasp of the lens and bgm, so as to achieve the harmony between the lens and bgm, test the editor's aesthetic feeling and lens sense, and bring visual impact to the audience. Please refer to various movie trailers for details.

The publicity effect of the film belongs to official publicity and is an effective means to bring traffic and box office to the film. Of course, many editing cows are now in the folk, mixing a person's film and television works or a series of film and television functions, giving people a greater visual impact.

To sum up, the author did not choose between them, but simply analyzed their role in the value framework of film propaganda. It may be a bit off topic, but if I really want to make a choice, my answer is: if I want to see through the essence behind a movie, I will choose film reviews; If I just want to get an experience in perception, I will choose film and television mixed cutting. (Ah, ah, ah, ah, ah, ah, ah, ah, ah, ah, ah, ah, ah, ah, ah, ah, ah, ah,

Glad to answer your question!

In fact, I like both! The key is to see the effect of the finished product!

1. Why do you like movie reviews?

If it's a movie I haven't seen before, I can quickly understand the plot of this movie through the movie reviews, and let me judge whether this movie is suitable for me. Of course, if the narrator doesn't explain the film well, it may also make me miss a good movie.

If it is a movie I have seen, I can review it, because I have different views from the narrator, so I can have a more comprehensive understanding of it from different directions.

2. Why do you like mixed editing of movies and TV?

Film and television mixing is more about expressing the author's thoughts. The author expresses or compares a certain viewpoint, idea or a certain film and television presentation form through his own ideas. In fact, the trailer we usually see is also a kind of mashup expression, and there is a reason why people go to see this film after seeing the mashup content.

The above is my personal opinion, hoping to help the landlord!

Hello, my friend, I'm Chen Guanju. Thank you for asking this question. Then this question is what I am doing at present, so I am very professional.

Your question is: Do you prefer film reviews or mixed editing in the field of film and television? Why?

First, I mainly like movie reviews. Why? Because, after watching a TV series, I know something about some characters in it. So I want to use my own words to explain the inner changes and plot changes of these characters. Bring happiness to everyone in your own way of explanation. This is my purpose. You can pay attention to me and see what features of the TV series I explain.

The second explanation has something in common with film and television. This editing requirement, I think my film and television mixing editing technology is not good enough. So movie reviews suit me. Because the film commentary can take screenshots of the specific content and interpret the plot in your own words. However, the requirements of film and television mashup are relatively high, including some transitions.

Three comments and film and television mixing are both in the field of film and television. You can make a comment or mix it up to see which recommendation is higher and which one you can do.

I'm inclined to film reviews. Through film commentary, I can understand the specific content of the film and have a more detailed understanding of the film. I can decide whether to watch this film and television drama in a few minutes, which saves a lot of time. Some film and television commentary can even be done, which is more attractive, funnier and deeper than the film and television itself.

I am not interested in it.

Hello, I'm glad to answer your question. I am an author in the field of film and television. Let me answer your question, "Do you like film and television reviews or mixed editing in the field of film and television? Why? " The following content is purely my personal opinion. Please give me your advice. Thank you!

First of all, what is film criticism and what is film remix.

1. Video comments:

Film and television criticism refers to a kind of comment made by film and television dramas in the process of plot playing. Its main function is to let the audience better understand the ins and outs of the story and express some personal views and feelings about the story. Its ultimate goal is to let the audience further explain, help the audience deepen their understanding of the story and increase the appeal of the story.

2. Film and television mixed cutting:

Film and television mixed editing is to recombine a film or multiple films and videos into a new theme through certain editing techniques. Mixed editing will have higher requirements for the author. To do a good job of mixed editing, the author must have a certain foundation, and not anyone can do it well.

So as far as my personal opinion is concerned, it is not biased towards film commentary or film mixed editing. If I had to choose one, I might like the latter, that is, film mixing, because film mixing works can make people understand the content of the same theme at a glance, but that doesn't mean I don't like film reviews. I am also the author of film and television works. Every day, in order to make netizens like my works, I am looking for materials that netizens like, so for film and television,

Thank you for reading, I hope you can be satisfied with my answer, thank you!

Hello, everyone, I'm glad to answer this question.

Film editing and criticism are equivalent to two different concepts. Explain that you can explain the central idea of this film in a humorous way and what you want to express through this film. Or tucao movies didn't achieve the expected results. Mixed shear is different. Mixed cropping is composed of multiple lens images, giving people another way of experience. Personally, I prefer mixed cutting. The following are the reasons why I like mixed cutting.

1. Mixed editing can quickly edit the central idea of a movie, so that the original 120-minute movie can make you fully understand the central idea of the movie in 5 minutes, instead of watching 120-minute movie.

2. You can show the image of a character or the development of something in the film more deeply by mixing and cutting, changing roles with multiple shots, soundtrack and so on. You can let two unrelated people see their resonance points through editing, soundtrack, special effects, transitions and so on.

3. Mixed cutting can be compared with how to deal with a person or a thing in multiple movies. For example, how happy it is to have a teacher who believes in himself. You can mix the clips of several films that the teacher believes the students. Let the audience feel that the teacher of this film is better, or that the teacher of that film is the same as mine. Let the audience resonate through mixed recording

That's why I like mixed cutting. I hope I can help you.

I don't think there is an absolute answer to this question. I can only say that different people have different opinions. In fact, it is so easy to do these areas well.

As far as hybrid breeding is concerned, creators need to read and watch a large number of film and television works in related fields, and can classify and label related fields, which requires a lot of time and energy. When you really want to create a mixed-cut work on a certain theme, you need to find the relevant video materials quickly, and then you need to find a way to connect them in series. These are all very laborious.

For the commentary, you need to watch the whole movie carefully, memorize the development track of key clips, key characters and stories, and at the same time, you need to be able to complete your own commentary in line with your own style, so that the audience can fully express the plot and internal meaning of the movie even without watching the movie.

Therefore, it depends on your final decision to mix and explain, and there is no absolute difference between good and bad.

In the field of film and television,

If you want to do a good job in the field of film and television, you should pay attention to several points

"1" Don't easily use plagiarism to intercept video clips;

1. If you want to do a good job of self-media in the field of film and television, first of all, don't intercept copyrighted film and television works, because they are not your own original works, so you should never easily publish such copyrighted and controversial film and television content and related clips. The system will not give you a high recommendation, and it will even be regarded as illegal production of titles.

The second book opens up the author's more effective secondary original content in the field of film and television and real-life commentary;

2. If you still want to do a good job in the field of self-media film and television, the best way is for a real person to appear in front of the camera and shoot a video. The audience will have different interests in presenting the film and television content to be explained, so that the video effect is their own original video, which is in line with the system recommendation.

"Three" dubbing soundtrack spoof content synchronization lines subtitles:

It is very difficult for a person to set foot in the field of self-media film and television. When you learn dubbing and spoofing content, your audience will think that what you have made is better than originality and innovation. Remember to match your own lines when intercepting video clips, and the effect will be more exciting.

Such as movies and TV reviews.

I think film and television mixed editing is soulless because it has no core content. And I think it's more copyright infringement.