Fuji, Canon and Nikon, whose jpeg is better?

Senior photographers save in RAW format, and then fine-tune themselves, and the output blockbusters are extremely beautiful. Only some paranoid senior photographers like to print JPG directly, and they must decide what processing style to choose before shooting, such as "optimizing curves". If you forget to adjust it, it will become an irreversible JPG screen. If you want to turn, you will lose the image quality. Among the machines I have used, Casio is the best one to output JPG directly, basically without post-adjustment, with moderate contrast, accurate color reproduction and pleasing film. The best-selling of its "selfie artifact" is not accidental, and image processing has its own experience. Fujifilm has a deep foundation in color processing, and his style selection of analog films can also make better films at will. Canon's direct JPG pictures are relatively plain, suitable for shooting the skin color of yellow people, keeping white and pink. Nikon's film style is Gao Fancha, and it is more beautiful to shoot landscape films. Shooting portraits with heavier skin color is not in line with the aesthetics of Asians, while Europeans agree. Nikon can choose the appropriate "optimized calibration" for JPG images, such as Gao Fancha scenery, low-contrast portraits and other processing styles.