SONY's SR2 camera, what is the specific effect? How much is the current market price?

mine is SR2E, which has been used for half a year. I feel very good, and the picture is better than I expected. The following is an evaluation paragraph written by myself, which is absolutely original and true, and it is also easy for our non-professionals to understand. I bought it at 7. Now I should get it at 56. During the shooting process, I found that SONY's screen is really a good thing, and it is still clear and bright under the strong light, but the display effect is not as good as it is. In dynamic shooting, I found a very unpleasant design. Although this DV uses a large-diameter Zeiss T* top lens, it can hold a very small range of scenery without zoom, which seems to be twice as small as my DC. Perhaps it is because my camera has a wide angle. Maybe all cameras have such a small wide-angle end, but this design will be very inconvenient when shooting large scenery at close range. On the other hand, the camera doesn't seem to adjust the standby mode, and there is no power-saving mode. That is to say, when it is not used for a short time, it won't close the lens cover, nor will it close the LCD screen (it can be closed manually), especially the lens cover, which is easy to get into the ground when it is windy. We should design a lens cover that can be opened and closed manually, or set the standby time to automatically close and save electricity, and this DV only shuts down at regular intervals, but the process of starting up is also very power-consuming. As for the battery, I feel that the medium-capacity battery given at random is enough for one day's intermittent use, which can provide two hours of continuous shooting, but it will not be enough for special occasions, such as watching performances, and the domestic battery with larger capacity has not yet come out, and the original battery is too expensive, so I have to wait. SONY's all-camera products have a * * * same advantage, which can display the battery remaining capacity by minutes at any time, making it easy for people to allocate time and know the battery situation at any time, which is better than Canon's ~ This time, it also made a comparative test of its camera ability. The test opponent is Canon IXUS 85, the imaging king of the card machine, aiming at the same target when taking pictures. DV uses 4 million pixels after interpolation, and DC uses 5 million pixels for balance, and the result is completely unexpected. However, it should be noted that the photo shooting ability of this DV has reached the household DC level, which is enough for general shooting requirements, and it is more than enough to develop photos. Finally, it's dynamic shooting ability. We shot 21 videos. As a high-end product in the field of SONY cameras, it reflects the good picture quality and Sony's usual very bright color style, which makes people feel relaxed and happy. In the case of sufficient light, the picture quality is even better than the analog signal of the TV station. In particular, SONY's unique Dolby 5.1-channel digital stereo recording and playback system embodies excellent sound reproduction and surround sound effects. It seems that SONY's promotion of making its own home theater is not groundless. But it only works well on TV, not on the computer. To sum up, this SR2E has become my favorite gadget, so I fiddle with it if I have nothing to do. My camera has a total pixel of 2.1 million, but 1.7 million is enough. I can't see the difference when the light is good, but the function, dark shooting effect and parts level are not the same, so don't pursue high pixels in the camera! ! I have always liked digital things, so I chose a good machine. For friends who shoot for ordinary travel, it is enough to have a million pixels. The number of pixels that can be displayed on TV is limited, so I can't see the difference. In addition, you should always be careful when traveling with DV, especially hard-disk DV. This thing is very delicate, and it will cost a lot of money if it breaks down, so in a way, it is still a small burden. Finally, give it a score. Appearance: 5 points (I don't want to buy it yet) Operation: 4 points (the operation is good when shooting, the zoom lever is moderate, the touch screen reflects accurately, and the operation is almost without any noise, but it is a little troublesome when connecting the computer TV, and the menu design needs to be improved, and the shortcut keys are not deleted) Photo: 5 points (compared with other DVs) Image: 5 points (the picture is very level) Sound effect: 5 points (needless to say) Top-level) functional design and humanization: 3 points (the humanized design is very good, and some other functional designs are very inconvenient, so it is good to give a sling and bag at random). The total score is 27 points, which is very good! I hope this article can help friends who are going to buy a camera. After all, it is my own experience. Before I buy a camera, I really want to see my own experience in using it, and there are few such articles, so I will post it to see if it can help ~ Express my joy by the way ~

Please adopt it.