About the material of net exposure-Director Nortel tricked students into making large-scale videos. How should victims protect their rights and interests?

What is the typical material of cyber violence? 1, an article named "Love You, Rape You" was circulated on the Internet, causing concern. This was written by a girl named Liang Ying, who described in detail how she was forced to confirm her love relationship after being sexually assaulted by the Roman champion, and how she was sexually assaulted and insulted many times afterwards. She said that she had the courage to tell the "truth", hoping to avoid other girls being victimized.

This "raped love" triggered the anger and condemnation of netizens.

Subsequently, Luo Champion, the "central figure in the whirlpool", voiced his denial of rape, saying that they had established a love relationship before having sex, hoping to clear their innocence through legal means. Luo Champion's sister also broke the news on the Internet that Liang Ying and Luo Champion broke up normally. Liang Ying had asked Luo Champion for a huge breakup fee.

On both sides, one shot at the other, and no one chose to give up. Liang Ying followed up and released Weibo, saying that the Chongqing police had filed a case, and the lawyer asked him to keep the evidence, continue to put the unmarked photo of Luo Champion and put the word "rapist" on it.

Liang Ying's attorney and Luo Champion respectively issued statements saying that the two sides reached a settlement. In the letter of apology, Liang Ying said that Luo Champion did not rape. Due to Liang Ying's misunderstanding of the legal definition of rape and the improper handling of the breakup by both parties, he exposed the rape of Luo Champion on the Internet and apologized to the public and Luo Champion and his family.

At this point, the week-long "war" finally came to an end. However, compared with the understated results, the public opinion influence brought by the whole incident has not dissipated because of the reconciliation between the two sides. Behind the calm "Liang Yingluo Champion Event", many people's blood and tears are buried.

The real "victims" in the whole incident are Luo Champion who lost his job, moved three times and suffered cyber violence, as well as netizens whose sense of justice was deceived, as well as Chongqing police who ran around, fully investigated and questioned directly. What is even more difficult to let go is that even if the truth is finally clarified, it may be difficult for Luo Champion to completely restore his reputation.

Liang Ying is very good at using the sympathy of netizens. With a reward of 3 million yuan from netizens, she cancelled Weibo, realized her goal of "being Japanese" with the help of public opinion, and disappeared from the Internet. Because of the reconciliation, things went away like this, and she was not punished and became the ultimate "winner".

It can't be ignored that the "evil" of "rumor maker" Liang Ying has hurt many people, and inciting public opinion with false information and remarks will eventually not only hurt the feelings of netizens, but also damage the public's trust. Liang Ying's behavior blocked the way for many real female victims to defend their rights, and those "weak" who really need to defend their rights in the future may be even harder to believe.

2. "The teacher's corporal punishment of asthmatic students caused a big reversal of vomiting blood" is exactly the same as this incident: Liu asked for help online. Her daughter with asthma was punished by the class teacher for running 19 12 10, and she has vomiting blood, shaking hands and other symptoms, which has not improved so far, and is equipped with clothes for vomiting blood and photos of the child in the hospital.

However, after investigation by the police, Liu admitted that his daughter was beaten by the teacher at 2 am and gave the teacher 60 thousand yuan, which was a lie he deliberately fabricated to expand his influence. A vigorous opening and an unexpected ending. What needs to be considered is why more and more "reversal events" occur repeatedly on some Internet platforms. Why have these platforms completely become a "public opinion field" full of scolding, unwise remarks and "shouting and killing"?

With the increasing number of online speech carriers and netizens, the role of online public opinion in promoting the development of events is becoming more and more obvious. As a public platform, the network bears more and more social responsibilities. The deepening of network supervision and network rights protection is undoubtedly evidence of social democratic progress. But in many cases, the network not only supervised the process of the incident and promoted the development of the incident, but also overdeveloped and incited public anger. Many netizens even jump to conclusions directly under the instigation of emotions, which eventually evolved into a vigorous "cyber trial" and became a "cyber violence" that had an excessive impact on the lives of the parties.

Looking back at the "No.1 scholar Liang Yingluo" incident, apart from the two sides, netizens who contributed to this "dog blood drama" and even eventually triggered cyber violence also played an important role. Originally, I thought I was the embodiment of justice, and stood on the moral high ground to criticize the perpetrators, criticize and blame blindly, and the truth came out. In fact, I became the executor of cyber violence.

As I wrote in "Half-monthly Talk": On the Internet, well-meaning netizens are likely to be caught in the rhythm and express their indignation for a while. They posted it online, and they are likely to become accomplices of bad people. In an illegal place on the Internet, you must think twice when you encounter sensational content published from the media. When you don't know the truth, don't impulsively forward comments, don't let goodwill be used, and your sense of justice be disappointed.

Only the truth is the greatest comfort to the parties concerned, and any other act of fanning the flames may be aiding the abuse. This incident has taught netizens another lesson: when they see the negative events exposed on the Internet, sometimes they can wait, eat melons rationally, "let the bullets of the truth fly a little longer", and don't be an accomplice of the "fake weak" and block the road of safeguarding the rights of the "real weak".

3. Ms. Gu was secretly photographed by Lang, the owner of a nearby convenience store, when she went to the community express delivery point to pick up the express delivery. Langmou then "joked" with his friend He Mou, fabricated chat content such as "Little Brother of Women's Derailment Express" and sent it to WeChat group. Then the rumors are forwarded and processed, and continue to ferment on the Internet.

In August, Ms. Gu was told by a friend that she called the police after discovering the situation. Subsequently, Yuhang Branch of Hangzhou Public Security Bureau issued a police report, saying that Lang and He fabricated chat content and sent screenshots to WeChat group, causing adverse social impact. According to the corresponding laws and regulations, the police imposed administrative detention penalties on the two respectively.

However, Ms. Gu believes that this incident has caused her serious physical and mental trauma. Ms. Gu, who was dismissed by the company, diagnosed as "depression" and lost her boyfriend's job, said that after a series of blows, she finally decided to defend her legitimate rights and interests with legal weapons.

According to the Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Laws in Handling Criminal Cases such as Defamation by Information Network, in any of the following circumstances, it shall be deemed as "serious circumstances" as stipulated in the first paragraph of Article 246 of the Criminal Law; The first one is that "the same defamatory information has actually been clicked, viewed more than 5000 times, or forwarded more than 500 times".

Gu Kailai's attorney, Zheng Jingjing, a lawyer of Zhejiang Jingheng Law Firm, provided a piece of evidence to the reporter. Wechat WeChat official account "Skill Uncle" published "Whose wife, your head is green enough to shine! By August 1 1 notarization, the number of hits was 10000, and the total number of views of multiple posts reached 60660, and the forwarding volume was 2 17.

Ms. Gu filed a criminal private prosecution with the Yuhang District People's Court in Hangzhou. Yuhang District People's Court decided to file a case in June 5438+February 65438+April.

4.20 12 years, the film Search was released, which tells the story that urban white-collar workers were forced into a dead corner of their lives because of the trivial matter of not giving up their seats on the bus, causing butterfly-like cyber violence. With the increasing popularity of the Internet, the chronic disease of cyber violence has troubled many people involved.

It has been 69 days and nights since the New Year's Eve of the Year of the Monkey. When Lv Yitao, the general director of the Spring Festival Gala, finally opened the comment function of Sina Weibo again after more than two months, he sent a simple reading speech. He was scolded to pieces again.

Although it was a tragedy, Lv Yitao didn't end his comments this time. After all, compared with the last time, he has seen the "big battle", and these abuses and curses are nothing at all. Those unscrupulous war of words eventually turned into a torrent of violence in the online world. Whether it is well-intentioned, malicious, unintentional or intentional, violence is called violence because its ultimate goal is to hurt people.

Reference source:

Phoenix Net-Exclusive: Why do people who eat melons become "accomplices"? Talking from the "Luo Zhuangyuan Incident"

Reference source:

Phoenix. Com- from private prosecution to public prosecution, the case of "women's express delivery being rumored": saying "no" to cyber violence

Advantages and disadvantages of network exposure, give a few examples. In favor: strengthen the handling of illegal acts and the supervision of relevant government actions, such as the Li Gangmen incident, the Wenqiang case, and the inventory activities carried out by the Heaven and Earth Society. Network exposure has contributed to these events. . .

Disadvantages: criminals use the internet to expose personal privacy, conduct human flesh search, or use the internet to expose hype, which seriously damages people's quality of life. Such as Xiaoyueyue incident and Xifeng incident.

Net exposure Nortel director tricked students into shooting large-scale videos. How should victims protect their rights and interests? Nortel is a dream college for many students, because as long as you can enter this college, you can increase your exposure even if you can't become an actor. However, some netizens reported on social platforms that the director of Nortel lied to students to shoot large-scale videos, which caused people to be curious about this character and also stripped the party out. The number of victims is as high as more than 30 students, and more than 200 girls are also asked for private letter accounts, so these victims can unite to report to the director, so that the other party can be punished by law.

Through the words of netizens, we can know that this director is not the same as a regular director. First of all, he will look at the girl's figure and say something sexually suggestive. Secondly, girls wearing underwear in swimming trunks will be spit out for other reasons, and even ask female friends to wear nothing in swimming trunks except the sexy suit that the director personally found. But most of these girls changed their clothes at the director's house. If they have cameras, they may record the bodies of female friends. In addition, the director also asked girls to take large-scale photos and videos on the grounds of taking things and recording things.

You know, everyone agreed to shoot these videos because they wanted to be popular and get ahead, but so many girls have never seen the material and no one has received it, so these girls are very afraid because they are afraid that the director will use it for other purposes. This kind of behavior will be characterized as obscenity and sexual harassment in law, so female friends can unite to take the director to court. Then molesting many female friends is a serious act, so the punishment will be particularly serious.

However, it can also indirectly show that female friends are not vigilant and trust others too easily. You know, how can an ordinary director focus on such sexy material? So I still have to study honestly. If a director really comes to the school to find a student to film, he will be selected through a formal process. In addition, when the other party proposes to wear sexy clothes, it will attract attention, mostly for shooting videos. If these videos are posted online or used for other things, female friends will definitely be hurt more.