Has anyone used the lens A35- 105f3.5? Pentecostal

I am using this lens, and I bought it second-hand. When I started, it was very cost-effective. I didn't know how to use it when I first started using it, and I just came into contact with photography, and the photos I took were not so good, so I always felt that this lens was very general and there were many suspected elements of hype. However, with the increase of my photography experience, I use this lens more and more smoothly. As the internet said, the quality of this lens is quite good. It is not an exaggeration to call him a bull's head. The aperture under F5 is extremely sharp, so I don't lose focus at all. The color of the photo is warm, which is my favorite kind. Compared with the contemporary autofocus head, it can only focus manually, even its biggest shortcoming is that the maximum aperture is only 3.5, so it is still possible to shoot still objects at night. Let's forget to shoot a moving object. If you want to freeze a moving object, ISO is generally above 1600, which is still relatively high for the fuselage. If you buy second-hand, the price of idle fish is about 500-600 now. Beyond this range, I think we can consider raising our heads automatically. After all, it's an old lens, and it's not easy to buy a satisfactory one. Besides, the focal length of this lens is 35- 105. It's embarrassing to use it on APSc fuselage without wide-angle end. If it is a Quan Huafu fuselage with this head, it is the most ideal, and it has really traveled all over the world, with good image quality and portability. I'm using kr now. I'm going to buy a second-hand K 1 when I have money.

Finally, two photos are attached for reference.