What are the infringements related to news photography?

The infringement type of news photography is 1. There are two common situations in which improper text description leads to inaccurate reports and improper text description: First, factual errors. There is also the improper use of words in the text description. News pictures speak with images, and the author's evaluation should be naturally revealed through the pictures, while it is easy to have problems in making tendentious or even insulting comments on objective things or people with words. 2. Inconsistency between pictures and texts leads to reputational infringement. In some critical and revealing reports, publishing photos that have nothing to do with the content of the article when using photos will easily lead to readers' vague understanding, thus causing reputation damage to the characters in the photo screen. 3. Infringe on the privacy of minors. On some occasions, we must pay enough attention to shooting minors, otherwise it is likely to accidentally infringe on their personal privacy. 4. Portrait pictures are used as commercial activities, which constitutes infringement. News pictures are taken in public activities and published in newspapers, and the parties will not pursue anything, but when many commercial activities in newspapers need pictures, they will call the pictures in the picture library. At this time, there is a certain infringement risk. 5. Street shooting constitutes infringement. When there is no ready-made news shooting task, sweeping the street is a reporter's professional habit. The pictures taken on the street are often natural in composition, and the instantaneous expressions of the characters are vivid, which is deeply loved by readers. However, because it was a live snapshot, the parties did not know and did not further verify the news facts. Once the picture is published in the newspaper, if the client thinks that his personal image has been defamed, or the news elements are different from the actual situation, the client may take the reporter to court on the grounds of infringement. 6. The spread of pictures on the Internet constitutes infringement. Some netizens downloaded the pictures taken by photographers, and after some tampering, they either changed their flowers, changed their faces or polished them. As a result, the fact and image of the whole picture have been greatly changed. Coupled with the rapid replication and dissemination of the network, its adverse effects can be imagined. With the increasing popularity of the Internet, this kind of infringement also increases the professional risk of photographers. I hope I can help you!