Which is more suitable for beginners, Fuji X-T20 or Sony 6300? In addition, is there a big difference in operation and shooting effect between non-inverting and SLR at the same price?

The choice of these two models involves the positioning of their future owners. The label of novice is of little significance, because they are all novices and accept new things at different speeds. More importantly, what do you do with it?

Fuji is a unique camera brand, and its users are characterized by young artists. Photography is not his main hobby. The internal setting is more "color", that is, the color of Fuji is more particular, although some strange things will happen in extreme cases.

Sony, on the other hand, went to the other extreme, with excellent performance, but the color, especially the photos taken directly (without computer editing), was mediocre. This machine is suitable for the computer room. As long as there is material, everything is under control.

SLR or something, the good shooting effect is mostly not because of the structure, but because of the manufacturer's understanding and analysis of color. Both Nikon and Pentax cmos are made by Sony, but Sony's own camera can't achieve the effect of these two cameras.

The advantages of SLR are long battery life, many controllable functions and fast running speed. To put it bluntly, it is convenient to work. Buy Nikon's D7200 or Canon's EOS 70D at this price (80D seems a little nervous after thinking about it), and buy a SLR to prepare more funds for changing lenses.

Speaking of lenses, I feel that you may have overlooked the importance of lenses. If you are interested in depth photography, you should think more about the lens. What subject matter to shoot and what effect to shoot are all related to the lens. SLR has accumulated many good products in lens. Although micro-single lens is easier to make, it has not yet formed the advantages of variety and price.