Traditional Culture Encyclopedia - Photography major - Did Americans land on the moon or not?

Did Americans land on the moon or not?

The American landing on the moon was the biggest political scam in the 20th century.

Zhou Qun's comment: I said many years ago, "As long as the people are masters of their own affairs, the government will do its utmost to eliminate the underworld, prostitutes, drugs, slums and high crime rate that people want most, and do its utmost to improve the social environment of medical care, education, employment, housing, old-age care and peace that people need most! So, does such a government that serves the people wholeheartedly still need to cheat the people to survive? ! In a country where the bourgeoisie is dominated by animals, the government must maliciously support the underworld, prostitutes, drugs, slums and high crime rates that people least want, and deliberately ignore the medical care, education, employment, housing, old-age care and peaceful social environment that people need most! So, can such a government that serves the bourgeoisie wholeheartedly live without deceiving the people? ! "

Therefore, it is normal for a junk capitalist country like the United States to cheat the world for a living. 1969 The so-called "Apollo" landing on the moon also treated people all over the world as idiots and created another political scam with its usual despicable means. The purpose is nothing more than to fool all mankind in the world: capitalist countries can land on the moon first despite maliciously supporting the underworld, prostitutes, drugs, slums and high crime rates that people least want!

Original reprint: "American Landing on the Moon, the biggest scientific scam of the 20th century"

Night rain on Mount Tai is ugly. Mount Tai listens to the rain.

Tomorrow (July 2 1 Sunday) is the 40th anniversary of the so-called "successful landing on the moon" in the United States. But with the development of science and technology, more and more people think that this is a big scam in America! Even today, more and more Americans suspect that this is a scam. According to British media reports on February 15 this year, with the 40th anniversary of NASA coming this summer, conspiracy theories about Apollo 1 1 manned landing on the moon are becoming more and more rampant. It is reported that the proportion of Americans who believe that "Apollo 1 1" landing on the moon is a complete lie has soared from 6% in 1979 to more than 22% now. In addition, more than 40% people are dubious, that is to say, only one-third of the American population is convinced that the United States landed on the moon successfully, and most people think it is a scam! The most shocking thing is that even a former engineer who participated in the rocket design of Apollo spacecraft and a former NASA astronaut thought that Americans did not land on the moon. Many people think this is the biggest scientific scam in the 20th century! Of course, people's doubts mainly focus on some details, such as many unreasonable questions exposed by photos and videos of landing on the moon! And my question is not only on these details, but also on more important and critical issues to prove that this is a scam! The author's questions are mainly manifested in the following aspects:

1, the main question is: How did Apollo leave the moon and fly back to Earth? It should be noted that the moon is also attractive. Flying back from the moon to the earth doesn't mean flying back if you want. He needs to get rid of the gravity of the moon and fly back to the earth, which requires a strong thrust to make the spacecraft leave the moon and fly to the earth, which requires a launcher and a launch vehicle, just like launching a spacecraft on the earth requires a launcher and a rocket! It is good that Americans can land on the moon, but how can they come back so easily? The technology at that time could not bring astronauts back to earth safely. Taking off on the moon requires a lot of fuel, and of course a launcher is needed, and taking off on the earth can't solve the problem of cooling the launcher. There are too many questions. The lander to the moon needs a recoverable rocket, and it is not a small thing. It needs a launcher. However, the American lunar module can't see the return rocket, so the return module is not only impossible to return to space, but also can't fly high, and there is no return rocket shooting at all. Now the truth has come out, not only the launcher, but also a hair. You know, until today, including our Chang 'e-1, Japan's lunar exploration satellites, and other countries' lunar exploration satellites, they are gone forever, and finally hit the moon and stayed on the moon forever, because we can't recycle the lunar exploration satellites to the earth at present, and it was difficult for the United States to reach this level at that time, but now the United States is not as good as before? Up to now, no scientist has given a complete and powerful explanation about how Apollo spacecraft flew back to Earth from the moon! Now many scientists just make some sophistry explanations in details. Besides, the biggest problem is how to land and take off spacecraft on the moon. Although the gravity on the moon is smaller than that on the earth, it is not small for spaceships in space. If it can land smoothly, it is not easy, but also ensure that there is enough fuel to take off again and get rid of the gravity of the moon. I don't know how the small lunar module, which looks like a spider, got rid of the gravity of the moon and landed safely without air and parachute!

2. After the lunar module returns to the lunar orbit, it must be docked with the on-orbit spacecraft, and the camera will be broadcast live without any personnel docking and returning to the mother ship. After the crew returned to the mother ship, the rocket with high thrust was ignited again, leaving the lunar orbit and returning to the earth orbit, and there was no relevant image data. The return of the lunar module to the lunar orbit requires constant adjustment of orbit and speed with the mother ship. The return and launch of the lunar module is a random process in time, direction and speed, so the docking will be very difficult and long, at least many times around the moon, but this process is not available in the live broadcast.

Only recently, with the help of Russia, the United States realized the docking of the space station in the earth orbit. In the late 1960s, without the docking of Earth orbit, it was impossible for the United States to dock the lunar orbit with greater difficulty. Without the docking of the lunar orbit, the astronauts on the moon cannot return. Earth orbit docking can only be realized under the precise monitoring and calculation of the ground monitoring network without dead ends. Obviously, the docking of the lunar orbit is much more difficult, and the current technology in the United States is not sure to be realized in a short time.

The United States flaunts itself as a country where human rights are supreme. Before manned space flight around the earth, it is necessary to go through many space experiments of no one, animals and plants before dare to send people into earth orbit. Therefore, before manned landing on the moon, a considerable number of people, animals and plants must experiment on the moon, otherwise the US government and NASA will ignore human life. However, the United States did not conduct unmanned, animal or plant landing tests, and sent two people directly to the moon at a time. Isn't this irrational and absurd disregard for human life?

5. About the landing of American live TV on the moon. The United States conducted a live color TV landing on the moon about 40 years ago. How fast does it take to broadcast live on the moon? Suppose it is the worst black-and-white TV effect, with a resolution of 320×200 and 10 pictures per second, and each pixel has 16 gray levels, then it needs a speed of 2,560,000bps. At present, there is hope only if the technology is nearly 6.5438+0 million times faster, which is impossible! Today's technology, whether it is antenna technology, communication technology (this time, in order to ensure the communication effect, a very long baseline interferometry technology is adopted) or image technology, was simply unimaginable 40 years ago. It is impossible for China to achieve such science and technology at present, and I have never heard of any country in the world that can do it, not to mention the numerous technological conditions that were backward 40 years ago. It should be noted that until today, when our Chang 'e-1 and Japan's Chang 'e-3 reached the lunar orbit, they could not be broadcast live on TV. The United States did it 40 years ago, but it can't do it today. Isn't it puzzling? Is to let America land on the moon again today. He can't even do it. The United States claimed that there were no drawings for launching rockets at that time. Is this possible?

6. All the moon landings were completed during President Nixon's term. Despite the rapid development of human science and technology in the past 40 years, no other American leader can complete the feat of landing on the moon during his term of office. It is said that with the rapid development of science and technology in the past 40 years, landing on the moon should be as easy as sending a satellite casually. However, until today, the American moon landing plan is still a distant plan. Is the technology not as good as it was forty years ago?

7. The "Goddess of the Moon" probe launched by Japan did not find any traces of Apollo landing on the moon and human activities when shooting over Apollo 15 and Apollo 17 landing areas. This also proves that the United States has never landed on the moon.

The rocks brought back from the moon are exactly the same as those collected by scientists from the South Pole. This is also a fact that many scientists dare not deny although they want to quibble.

9. Let's talk about this scam from the flaws that people can see through details such as photos and videos of landing on the moon:

Evidence of moon landing fraud (1): There are no stars in the sky in the moon landing photos.

Evidence of lunar fraud (2): The lunar module landed without hitting a hole on the surface of the moon.

Evidence of lunar fraud (3): The strong gas generated during the landing of the lunar module will blow away the dust nearby, so there is no astronaut's footprint near the lunar module.

Evidence of the moon landing scam (4): Because the sun is the only light source on the moon, the shadows of all objects in the moon landing photos should be parallel, but the shadows in many photos are in different directions, showing that there is more than one light source or the light source is very close to the object.

Evidence of the moon landing scam (5): Why are some photos taken in different places with the same background, as if using the same set version?

Evidence of moon landing fraud (6): After the moon landing mission is completed, the upper upgrade of the lunar module can't see the flame emitted by the rocket engine when flying off the moon surface, which proves that this is false, and the upper upgrade is also a model hoisted by steel cables.

Evidence of the moon landing scam (7): As long as the so-called moon landing movies are played with a fast mirror, it will be found that the actions of astronauts and lunar rover are exactly the same as those on earth, which proves that these movies are false.

Evidence of the moon landing scam (8): There is no air on the moon. Astronauts can see the national flag fluttering in the wind when inserting it, which proves that the film was shot by the earth.

Evidence of fraud on the moon (9): The glass of the camera used by astronauts is engraved with several cross lines, which is convenient for measuring the photographed objects. Why are these crosshairs not superimposed on the object, but behind some photos, proving that these so-called crosshairs were added afterwards and these photos are fake?

Evidence of moon landing fraud (10) There is no reason for the United States to take back the displayed national flag. The United States should leave the national flag on the moon as a souvenir, which is also a strong evidence that the United States took the lead in landing on the moon and occupying it. However, not doing so is not in line with the consistent habits of the United States.

10, Russian space research expert Alexander. Goldov pointed out: It is even more enlightening to see astronauts walking on the surface of the moon from the film documentary, just like walking on the ground. In fact, the gravity on the moon is six times smaller than that on the earth, so every step people take on the moon is equivalent to a step 5 to 6 meters long on the ground; When the lunar landing instrument moves on the surface of the moon, the speed of the pebbles ejected from the wheel of the lunar landing instrument falling to the ground is the same as that on the earth, and it should be six times faster on the moon than on the earth. Ralph, a famous American engineer. Rene, British scientist David. Perry and Mali. Bert agreed to his question. People represented by Hamlet, a famous American physics professor, affirmed the theory of deception.

1 1. People represented by Hamlet, a famous American physics professor, affirmed the "deception theory". The modern space shuttle can only send 20 tons of load into low orbit, but Saturn V can easily send more than 65,438+000 tons of load into earth orbit and push dozens of tons of objects out of the earth's gravitational circle. Why was it abandoned later? It is said that even the drawings have not been preserved? Moreover, the influence of the daytime temperature of the lunar surface on photographic equipment can reach 12 1℃. According to the picture, the camera is exposed outside the spacesuit and there is no heat preservation measure. The film will curl when heated at 66℃. How to take pictures?

12. In addition, if the lunar module achieves a soft landing through rocket reaction, the floating soil around the lunar module will be blown away like a helicopter, and it is even more impossible to step on footprints! But in the so-called moon landing photos in the United States, we can't see the traces of the floating soil being blown away, but the footprints stepped by the so-called astronauts! What a self-contradictory naked lie! On September 27th, 2003, the European Space Agency successfully launched the first lunar probe-SMART-1,which was also the first lunar probe launched by human beings in the 20th century. It successfully entered the orbit around the moon on June 5438+065438+1October 65438+May 2004. The European Space Agency's lunar probe flew for two months every year before entering the lunar orbit. It took the United States 10 days to go to the 380,000-kilometer moon belt and return. Is this possible?

Since the late 1970s, former employees and journalists of NASA exposed the moon landing scam for the first time, believing it was a lie. Since the United States filmed the moon landing in the studio, it has deceived the whole world. More and more scientists and people all over the world think that landing on the moon is a scam. Known as the "father of the moon landing scam", BillKaysing and British photographer DavidPercy wrote "We have never landed on the moon". BillKaysing has a good background. He used to be one of the "designers" of the lunar module manufacturer Rocketdyne, claiming to be familiar with the "details" of the "moon landing" scam. In order to strengthen the credibility of his works, he claimed to have invited a number of "anonymous" experts to help. To NASA's embarrassment, even Bill Carson, a former engineer who participated in the rocket design of Apollo spacecraft, and a former NASA astronaut thought that Americans did not land on the moon. Bill Cassim said that the landing scene of the lunar rover looked like a prop in a movie studio was slowly "landed" by several steel ropes. In fact, even Brian O 'Lear, a former NASA astronaut, doubted whether Americans really landed on the moon. Brian was an American astronaut in the 1960s, and also a consultant for Apollo's moon landing program. But Brian said implicitly, "I'm not 100% sure whether humans really walk on the moon." Former astronaut Brian's suspicion was a bombshell for NASA, which caught NASA off guard.

Now many countries, including American scientists, are skeptical about the US landing on the moon, and with the development of science and technology, more and more people are skeptical! Strangely, so far, we haven't seen any official response from the United States. Neil armstrong, the first man on the moon, is still alive. Why not let him come out and clarify the facts? Is the United States dismissive of this, or is it hiding something? Perhaps they have realized that it is wrong for American predecessors to lie. If they defend lies again, won't they put themselves on the moral judgment platform?

Incredibly, Americans refused to clarify their problems. Faced with questions, some so-called experts, professors and elites in China who are pro-American and worship the United States are anxious. They are eager to jump out and support the success of landing on the moon, just as they believed that he personally landed on the moon. Neil armstrong is still alive, but no one has come out to clarify. What are you in a hurry to do? It is nothing more than asking American masters to keep pets! They don't allow people to question their masters, even if your questions are well documented! Because they worship their master too much, in their minds, their master is perfect! What a shame to China people!

So, why did the United States create a moon landing scam? I think the main reasons are as follows (of course, many experts also think so):

There are five obvious motives for the United States to concoct this "manned moon landing" super scam.

The first motive is that since Kennedy announced in 196 1 that Americans should land on the moon first, the space hegemony of the United States and the Soviet Union has entered a white-hot state, and Americans are bent on defeating the Soviet Union in the space race.

The second motive is that in the summer of 1969, the Soviet Union was only one month away from launching its own manned spacecraft. At that time, the US government was mired in the Vietnam War and faced a wave of protests from the people of China. The American government concocted the "Apollo 1 1" moon landing scam, which can divert Americans' attention.

The third motive is that in the 1960s, when technology was far behind now, NASA could not successfully send a man to the moon, so it could only fake a "landing on the moon". The computing power of the computers used in the Apollo moon landing program from 65438 to 0969 is called "pediatrics" compared with the current home computers; The satellite navigation system used in cars now is far more advanced and complicated than the navigation equipment that guided Apollo spacecraft to the moon. Conspiracy theorists believe that manned landing on the moon is far from simple. Former US President George H.W. Bush announced ambitiously that Americans would return to the moon a few years ago, but he was told by NASA that it would take at least 1 1 year for NASA to achieve manned landing on the moon again.

The fourth motive was that NASA always had a national budget of $40 billion, and it had to do something to convince people that the money was not wasted.

The fifth motive was that the whole world was paying attention to the progress of manned landing on the moon in the United States at that time, and failure was obviously not the best choice.

So how are these illusions about landing on the moon concocted?

Skeptics say that the video of the moon landing provided by NASA was taken a few months before Apollo 1 1 landed on the moon. When the United States announced that Apollo astronauts had officially landed on the moon, American TV stations began to broadcast this video, as if it were really a live broadcast of landing on the moon. Conspiracy theorists believe that "5 1 Zone" is the best place for NASA to shoot a simulated moon landing scam. "5 1 area" is located in the remote Nevada desert, which is also called "the land of dreams". The lunar rover, which landed slowly, was slowly hoisted to the desert ground by several steel cables like movie props!

We should be skeptical about science, just as Copernicus doubted the "geocentric theory" and Bruno doubted the "sun center theory". Based on the existing scientific knowledge of mathematics, physics, chemistry, medicine and so on, we doubt that the United States landed on the moon 40 years ago. We hope that the American authorities can give you a reasonable and credible explanation, otherwise we have every reason to think that this is the biggest scientific scam that the United States dedicated to the world in the 20th century. Lies stop at facts. The feat of Americans landing on the moon 40 years ago made many people sneer. The day when the lie was really exposed was the day when the Americans failed or succeeded in landing on the moon. Americans plan to land on the moon as early as 20 15, and there are still six years to prepare. However, if they can land on the moon before 2020, it will be an amazing feat. What I want to see is not American jokes, but the rapid progress of human science and technology again.

The United States, if you have the courage, go to the moon again to show everyone, and let your elite fans of China experts and professors hold their heads high once.

1. From the photos sent back by the International Space Station, it can be found that the spacesuit bulges in a vacuum, but the spacesuit in the moon landing photos does not.

2. The direction of the shadow left by the object on the image is multi-directional, while the shadow formed by the sunlight on the object should be in one direction.

3. The video shows that when the astronauts pass the Stars and Stripes, the flag is also shaking, and there is no air on the moon.

When the spacecraft landed on the moon, it should blow up a lot of dust, but the vicinity of the landing point of the spacecraft in the photo was calm as usual, indicating that the deceleration rocket didn't work at all.

In some moon landing photos, there is an imperceptible line between the close shot and the distant shot, which reminds people of the "fade-out painting" in movie stunts, that is, draw the distant shot first, and then cover it with light and shadow.

6. The temperature on the surface of the moon can reach 100 degrees Celsius during the day. According to the picture, the camera is exposed outside the spacesuit and there is no heat preservation measure. The film will curl when heated at 66℃. How to take pictures?

7. From the video, astronauts walking on the surface of the moon is just like walking on the ground. In fact, the gravity on the moon is much smaller than that on the earth. The pebbles ejected from the moon landing wheel also fall at the same speed as on the earth.

According to the data released by NASA, the incident angle between the sun and the moon is only 6-7 degrees, but the photos of the Stars and Stripes show that the incident angle of the sun is about 30 degrees.

From the 1960s to today, there is no technical condition to realize live TV broadcast from the moon. Even now, it takes nearly 20 minutes for an American rover to send back a photo, and the information content of the video signal far exceeds ordinary data. How did the United States realize live television in those days?

10, the United States did not develop the first Saturn V until 1967 65438+ 10/0, and conducted the first launch test on 65438+ 10/27 October. Unfortunately, the fire killed three astronauts. Subsequently, the lunar module was redesigned, and the hardware development was delayed by 18 months. 1how is it possible to land on the moon once in July, 969?

1 1. The modern space shuttle can only send 20 tons of load into low orbit, and the United States has no suitable vehicle to send the space station into earth orbit until today. Saturn V can easily send more than 65,438+000 tons of payload into Earth orbit with a success rate of 65,438+000%. Why was such an efficient launch vehicle later abandoned, and even the drawings were not kept?

12. There is no official response from American officials to the voices of doubt from all directions. Armstrong still refuses to attend any press conference, sign autographs or take photos. Why did the space hero who "first set foot on the moon" choose to be silent for more than 30 years?

13 just as the voice of doubt grew louder and louder, NASA announced that it had lost all the original videos of 13000 landing on the moon. How can such a huge amount of precious materials be easily lost?