Did the classic biographical film "The Slow Biography of Gandhi" directly kill the bottom line of the soul?

The Biography of Gandhi is probably the most classic biographical film in film history. The film tells the life of Mahatma in nearly 200 minutes. Kingsley reproduced Gandhi's image almost perfectly. The slow pace of old-school movies is not very strong, and there is no artificial component. For a film length of more than three hours, it is very valuable. Compared with Gandhi, who directly killed the bottom line of the soul, the level of this film can still be improved.

Through this film, I mainly learned a lot of knowledge and learned about Gandhi's life. Gandhi is widely recognized as a popular leader in the west because of his non-cooperation. As for whether his policies are good or bad for India today, this is too responsible and will not be discussed here. In short, as far as biopic is concerned, it's not bad. Excellent scene control and Ben Kingsley's performance with both form and spirit are commendable. Biographies can be said not to be dragged down by genres.

A man of faith has made unimaginable contributions to his faith and the peaceful liberation of India. It is hard to imagine that democracy and freedom can be achieved without using them, but Gandhi did it. What is particularly lamentable is that this man sets an example and never asks others to do what he cannot do. Biographies are generally boring, and this film has not obviously deliberately sensationalized or highlighted Gandhi's personality charm.

Maybe you will think that Gandhi gave people a sense of sacredness from the beginning, and the film beautified Gandhi a little. It is called Mahatma because of its cultural background. India still has a caste class, so it needs a deified savior as its spiritual pillar. Gandhi appeared in the British colonial era. With the sunset and India's independence, Gandhi became a blessed saint.

Not to mention the brain-dead virgin Gandhi, the film won the prize because of this theme! Moreover, the film itself has empty characters, walk-on stories, completely mindless supporting roles, and facebook villains, which leads to inexplicable victories. I really don't feel like a saint, just catching up with the virgin of the times.

Anyway, through movies, I can deeply appreciate Gandhi's lofty spirit and have to admire it. Unable to fight back? Spiritual leader. The film is not only beautifully shot, but also embodies a more shocking spirit and thought. This is a real biographical film, which is worth remembering. Ben. Kingsley's performance of the unity of soul and body is like Gandhi's possession, and the director's control makes the film a model in biographical films in plot narration, picture composition and lens language.

Smooth narration, exquisite photography and soundtrack have every reason to make this film win the 55th Oscar. The film also saw the deification process of Gandhi. India's divine thought made Gandhi successful, but at the same time everything of Gandhi was imitated. Simplicity, hunger strike and spinning have therefore become the targets of Indian imitation. A country with too strong divinity is naturally trapped by religious factors, and division and vendetta also stem from religion. Therefore, cult of personality and worship of gods can be regarded as the main body of life and the product of pre-modernity, which is one of the reasons why India is still poor.

How to shoot a biographical film, compared with domestic ignorance, it is undoubtedly much wiser to choose a theme from beginning to end. Gandhi? Irresistible? What exactly is the idea in the film is fully displayed, which makes people think. In the end, Gandhi died at the gun of the villain. It is said that the director has been preparing for this film for 20 years, which is really well-intentioned.

As a ... People? Gandhi achieved the ultimate, just like Mandela and Guevara, they are legendary heroes of their respective countries and will be the brightest pearl in human history. For a great soul like Gandhi, straightforward narration is enough to make a great movie, and all other grandstanding and processing are redundant. The old movies 30 years ago are not old-fashioned at all, just like today. This film is straightforward, objective perspective and narrative style, which is excellent in biographical films.

Of course, it would be superficial to tell Gandhi's life in movies. What is Gandhi's deepest understanding of human nature in the film? People can't accept injustice? He exposed injustice to the world through the non-cooperative movement, and finally won the support of ordinary people in India and Britain, realizing India's independence. In fact, Gandhi's greatest victory in his life is not his political achievements, but his own efforts to lead people out of madness. This is the hardest part.

The most shocking thing about the movie is a sentence from his friend. The greatest thing about Gandhi is that he can calm crazy people down. This is the essence of non-force and non-cooperation, which makes you see the power of faith. Not the kui is a person who hits the bottom line of the soul.