What are the similarities and differences between the Mohist "universal love" and Xunzi's lover?

Confucianism: (reason) benevolence and righteousness Mohism; benevolence and righteousness (morality) (emotion) emotion utilitarianism (rights) "Love each other and benefit each other" is the core of Mozi's entire ideological system. He believes that lovers should be far away from those around them. , the elders and the younger should love each other. But Confucius’ benevolence is caring, caring, sympathy, understanding and respect for others. Loving others should be based on close relatives, mainly dealing with the kinship within the patriarchal family relationship, and loving others involves the country, superiors and subordinates, monarchs and ministers, and international relations. The difference between later Mohism and later Confucianism: As shown below: Gong (external) - ambition (internal) Love - benevolence - righteousness Mozi advocated "loving each other and benefiting each other". The later Mohists inherited this idea and proposed "Love others as nothing more than yourself, and yourself in what you love." The connotation of "righteousness" changes with the development of society and history, and involves the issues of "ambition" and "gong". Mohism does not agree with the Confucian view that "benevolence" is internal and "righteousness" is external, and believes that "benevolence and righteousness" both belong to "ambition". In fact, "benevolence" means "love" and "righteousness" means "benefit". "Love" and "benefit" are both the behavioral results of the subject of value behavior, which is "merit". Therefore, Mohism advocates the unification of "ambition" and "gong" on the basis of external skills.

(See "Sutra 2")