Is Sony A6000 micro-single suitable for beginners who often take pictures of landscapes and portraits?

A6000 takes pictures of scenery and A7M2 takes pictures of people. I feel a little troublesome. It is not the camera that is troublesome to carry, but the camera switching. Sometimes I have to shoot people, sometimes I have to shoot scenery, and I feel that changing planes frequently is quite a headache. Here, I only talk about being a beginner, a photographer or using photography as a tool to record travel. Later, I considered buying a wide-angle lens and tried it with someone else's lens. On the contrary, it is more troublesome than bringing two machines, especially to shoot larger scenes, and sometimes close-ups are needed. I haven't considered a shot that travels all over the world. I can't stand the price and size of zoom bull's head, so I haven't bought it. I am a photographer, not a professional, and I don't want to buy all the lenses in focus. Portraits and humanities are the most photographed by me. This 35mm lens is most suitable. In fact, 50mm or 55mm is ok, but I can't do both. Besides, I just went out to shoot the scenery, and then a 24mm or 28mm lens came in handy. Frankly speaking, there are not many opportunities to shoot scenery, especially for big scenes. Generally, the scenery is 35mm occasionally, so I don't think it's worth buying an expensive wide-angle bull's head, except those with that special hobby. Just like a 200mm telephoto lens, sometimes you have to use it without it. If there is, it will be used less than a few times a year, which is embarrassing. So I decided to buy an old manual pan/tilt, which was used on A6000 and A7, and both were very good. Here, as before, it is still very cost-effective to buy A6000 at this stage. 50mm lens, don't buy a hood unless the budget is really insufficient. I bought a portrait lens. What about the scenery? Until a while ago, I accidentally learned about the RX 100 series cameras. Actually, I knew it before, but I didn't touch it or feel it. When I went to taikoo hui, I saw this guy and said it was so expensive. I didn't buy it. I might as well buy a lens. Now, I haven't bought a lens. As a result, I still don't have a wide angle It's cheap to buy, but when you focus on a big scene, especially the enlarged focus of A6000 and A7M2, sometimes the effect is not so good. The focus reference point cannot be found on the large scene. Unlike humanities and portraits, you can find the right focus after zooming in, and you can see whether you are in focus through the viewfinder. But wide angle is difficult, especially for beginners. RX 100 M3 attracted me, and the price was 4000. For a wide-angle fixed-focus bull's head, it is a price of FE35 2.8, but the focal length of 24-70 and the aperture of wide-angle end 1.8 are excellent in daytime, and the overall photo is very good. However, due to the limitation of CMOS, the resolution still can't catch up with APSC or Quan Huafu, but it is absolute. This size, weight and price are also worthy. So I hesitated, starting with M3. I didn't buy M4 because I didn't need photography. I bought it not only to meet my needs of shooting wide-angle scenery, but also to take it with me when I go out, and I can take it out at any time to shoot, eat and close up. Haha, the shutter time is faster than my A6000 and A7M2. Great, I and the female ticket both have cameras, three, portraits and wide angles. She patted her hand with 6000. Although the quality is not good, but shooting more, the technology is gradually improved. If you want to take portraits and scenery, you can consider this combination, A6000+50 M3, 9000 yuan a set. I'm not talking about price, I'm talking about practicality and personal experience.