Chen Kun was sued by the photographer. What is the photographer's initial intention?

Chen Kun was sued by the photographer. The photographer's initial intention is to make people pay more attention to copyright issues and support intellectual property protection.

Chen Kun reprinted the pictures on the Internet without authorization, and the photographer went to court. The verdict was that Chen Kun lost the case. The photographer's initial intention is not to ask for high compensation, but to remind everyone of copyright issues.

1. Chen Kun released pictures without authorization, and the defendant infringed on Chen Kun's posting of a status in Weibo, accompanied by a very beautiful picture, which was the photographic work of a professional photographer. This is a common thing in everyone's eyes, but the photographer took it to court. Chen Kun posted pictures on the Internet without the photographer's authorization, which directly violated the photographer's copyright. The court ruled that Chen Kun lost the case, needed compensation and publicly apologized. Everyone will think that this kind of rights protection behavior is understandable, but for photographers, the work is their own hard work. If it is used by others without authorization, it is an infringement on itself and is also protected by law. If a public figure like Chen Kun doesn't pay attention to copyright issues and forwards pictures at will, it will be very unfavorable to photographers and the photography industry. Moreover, the photographer didn't ask for high compensation in this lawsuit, so the photographer's initial intention should only be to protect rights and remind everyone of copyright issues through Chen Kun.

Second, copyright infringement is a common problem, and netizens pay little attention to it. The development of network and technology provides convenience for everyone, but it also provides inconvenience for the protection of intellectual property rights. Many photographic works want to increase their attention, so they will put pictures on the internet for everyone to enjoy, but it is inevitable that some netizens will reprint them at will. For the author of a work, his rights and interests are not completely protected, and many times when people reprint very beautiful pictures, they don't know who is behind the author, and the author can't find the real infringer when defending rights. Such behavior has become very common. So this time, Chen Kun, as a star with high attention, reprinted unauthorized photos and was sued by the photographer, just to remind everyone of copyright issues. The photographer's action provided some exposure for the photography industry, and also gave everyone a legal lesson. Unauthorized reprinting of photos infringes on the author's own copyright. I hope netizens will pay more attention to the protection of copyright and intellectual property rights, which will help to form an orderly legal network environment. I believe that the photographer's initial intention is only to legally protect rights and remind everyone of the legality of copyright.

Chen Kun was taken to court by the photographer. The photographer didn't ask for high compensation, but asked Chen Kun to apologize publicly on the online platform. Therefore, it is conceivable that the initial intention of photography is not for fame and fortune, but for legal rights protection, in order to let more people know the legitimacy of copyright and the importance of protecting intellectual property rights with the help of Chen Kun.