Traditional Culture Encyclopedia - Photography major - Which 3D picture is better, transformers 3 or Avatar?

Which 3D picture is better, transformers 3 or Avatar?

Please. The two films use two technologies completely, okay?

Change 3 is mainly based on computer special effects technology of real scenes and models, while Avatar is all shot by computer special effects (including mountains, rivers, grasslands and trees). The difference is that the Transformers in Change 3 all use models to process images through computer operation, while the planes and combat robots in Avatar also use models, but the key point is that the Na 'vi people are all real people. This is Cameron's expression capture technology. ........................................................................................................................................... ............................. recognized that the picture of Change 3 was really hot, but the 3d effect was far behind Avatar. For example, none of the 3d masterpieces released since then have satisfied the audience, because Avatar has been deeply rooted in the hearts of many viewers! In addition, Avatar was shot with a 3d camera throughout the movie. If it's changed to 3, it's estimated to be the post-3d, because if it's shot entirely with a 3d camera, the investment is estimated to be bloody, because the investment in filming Avatar alone will cost 500 million dollars, so I think it's very thoughtful to change to 3. After all, not everyone has Cameron's ability! If you have a chance, you can go to see the imax version of Avatar. The effect is quite good. Of course, I have seen the ordinary 3d version, but glasses can make people panic and sometimes get dizzy, but imax version also has it, but the effect will be better! Anyway, to put it bluntly, Avatar is a milestone in the history of movies and a turning point in movies. Ordinary commercial films like "Change 3" cannot be easily surpassed! It's not that I don't like changing 3. Actually, I'm also a Transformers fan, but this profitable commercial blockbuster sometimes seems like a flash in the pan. It was also the remake of King Kong in 2005, which won both the box office and the Oscar, but it won the memories of the box office and the audience, but it didn't win the Oscar! This is a typical movie to make money for the sake of making money. The plot inside is terrible!