If you want to learn photography, how about getting started with Canon 550D?

Press the shutter 2000 times and it will start. You'd better feel for yourself, try all kinds of gears, debug them, and experience the characteristics of aperture priority, shutter priority and automatic gear. If you shoot too much, you will naturally have it.

Personally, I prefer to buy Canon. Canon is soft, rich in details, and the price is good. Now Nikon is not cost-effective, and D90 is easy to break down. Three or four of the products I bought for my friends have had various problems, and the shutter accuracy of 35,000 is not enough. Ask customer service is a natural death, in sharp contrast to D80, which used to be hundreds of thousands of shutters. The so-called Nikon cost performance is gone. There is not much difference between 550D and 500D. As a camera, especially the camera you just started, the function and effect are basically the same, but there is absolutely no difference between a few pixels, because the picture quality can only be reflected through extreme operation, and it is very small. For example, two machines with a difference of 5 million pixels, of course, have a larger base, and the ratio of 654.38+00,000 to 6 million is definitely obvious. If you shoot casually with a cheap head and natural light, you can't see much difference, but if you use more than 10 thousand lenses and professional lighting, you can naturally see some subtle differences. Can you understand me?