Why is the BBC still using film cameras?

Digital cameras, digital cameras and digital cameras are far inferior to film cameras and film cameras in imaging quality and latitude.

For film cameras, because most ordinary color printing departments use c-4 1 to print photos, and all the parameters are balanced, they are not professional, so the photos taken will be "ordinary". Ordinary people don't develop photos with special development, so the advantages of film can't be reflected in ordinary photos.

For film cameras, the most basic condition for photographers to shoot movies, whether digital or film, is that the films they shoot should be like "movies" rather than "videos". Therefore, the film texture is the simplest "film texture", and the imaging quality and tolerance are the strongest. Digital cameras are only the choice of low-cost movies, and the picture quality can't be compared with film. Usually, we open the movies on dvd, and at most they are Blu-ray. The resolution of blue light is also 1080p. This difference is very subtle. When you see the original film, you will be amazed at its imaging quality.

Finally, Canon has no mark series. Logo refers to its offspring products. For example, Canon 1D mark II refers to the second generation of Canon 1D cameras. You said that the 20w camera should be 1D mark IV with a frame less than 35mm (Quan Huafu). There is no huge statement.