Should I choose Sony or Nikon to upgrade Quan Huafu? Why?

Your problem description is nearly 1000 words. It seems that your entanglement is a bit complicated and specific! Let me analyze and answer your questions one by one:

First, after reading your thousands of words, I feel that you are not going to support your family by photography.

Yes, that's right. At most, you may want to join a xx photographer's association and win the grand prize in the xx photo contest. Even, you never thought about it. You just want to play by yourself.

Yes, you can play by yourself. It is really not recommended that you have a fever and upgrade your equipment.

Even many so-called senior photographers of xx Photographers Association are actually useful. Many people use the fuselage of 10 years ago!

First-class photography depends on creativity, second-rate photography depends on skill, and third-rate photography depends on equipment. This statement is never wrong.

Well, it goes without saying that everyone with or without money should buy the best camera.

Third, you think Nikon D8 10 with 2470 is stupid. Well, I can't say anything!

If you really feel heavy, then, excuse me, isn't the Sony Quan Huafu micro-single and lens very heavy? What's more, Sony Quan Huafu actually feels worse than Nikon!

Well, you really think too much!

You also said that Sony a6000 looks good, yes, it looks like black technology, but the actual experience of Sony A6000 is not good, and a good lens is expensive. It's also a waste to buy a good lens, because Sony will still think that you can only buy a Quan Huafu body.

Sony's aps body is suitable for people who shoot videos, as well as those who already own Sony Quan Huafu. If you want to buy a Sony APS fuselage as the main camera, I don't think it's wise.

4. Are you planning to upgrade the fuselage? Quan Huafu thought and thought, but he didn't make up his mind?

Well, you are a user of Nikon D7 100. I think the body of Nikon D7000 series is actually not light. Since you've put up with it for so long, I don't think it's a problem to be big.

20 18 6 18, the promotion is still good. Nikon D8 10 has a high cost performance, which is enough, really enough.

If you are going to have a high fever about landscape photography, you should actually aim at Nikon D8 10 and Nikon D850. After all, Nikon has a higher cost performance and Sony has a lower cost performance.

What's more, Nikon's fuselage, reliability and durability are well-known, and Sony's electronic products will really be eliminated soon!

Is the verb (abbreviation of verb) Quan Huafu really necessary?

In fact, I really think that sincerity is unnecessary and necessary for people who don't rely on photography to make money to support their families.

APS frames are enough. If you want to play better, you can choose Fuji APS micro-single, that is, the lens is more expensive and the focus is slower, and there is really nothing wrong with others. Anyway, you mainly focus on landscape photography, flower photography and still life photography, and you don't need high-speed focusing and high-speed continuous shooting.

Sugar flat photography, Fuji micro-single, is really a very good choice. I think you should focus on sugar water tablets.

To sum up, in view of your actual situation, you are very entangled. The root cause of entanglement is mainly because you don't have enough spare money. Since you have little spare money, don't consider Sony. Sony's small step run is upgraded every year, and the machine you bought will soon be really out of date. Sony's lenses are also expensive. I really don't recommend Sony because you are so obsessed. What's more, you just play by yourself and definitely don't shoot any 4k videos. You want Sony.

In your actual situation, you can actually continue to use APS frames. If it is a little extravagant, you can consider changing to Fuji Micro-single. If you don't want luxury, you should continue to use Nikon D7 100. In terms of lenses, you can gradually buy a few better lenses, and then buy the latest upgraded Nikon D8 10D850 when you have a good lens and money.

I have been an old user of Nikon for more than ten years. At present, Nikon's main machine is the half-frame flagship Nikon D500, which is mainly used for ecological photography such as bird shooting. I upgraded the full-frame machine the year before last, but according to my usage and demand analysis, I live in a city and need a portable, high-quality and high-performance full-frame machine to take with me, so that people can take pictures wherever they go. In addition, considering the travel shooting. Two years ago, the performance and image quality of Nikon D8 10 were excellent. Most of the existing Nikon lenses in my hand are full lenses. Therefore, from the economic point of view, upgrading Quan Huafu Nikon is definitely the best choice. However, in view of my original intention of upgrading Quan Huafu: portability, thinness, high performance, travel shooting, etc. The size and weight of Nikon full SLR are obviously difficult to meet my requirements. In addition, according to the development trend of my photographic equipment, I personally think that the advantages of mirrorless cameras will become the mainstream in the future. So I chose the Sony micro-single A7Rll, Sony Fe16-35mm/F4+70-200mm/F4, and bought the fixed focus of FE 55/f 1.8. In the next two years, this game played with me quite easily and happily! The portability and burden reduction given by the micro-single will make the shooting process and travel more interesting. So at the end of last year, I bought Sony's new micro-single flagship machine A9 to make up for the lack of A7Rll. Now A9+FE55/F 1.8 has become my personal computer with unparalleled performance, which makes me enjoy real photography fun. I'm glad I made the right choice. Send some pictures for your reference.

I'm wasting my breath, man. Forgive me.

1. Is Sony CMOS really good? I don't think so

The same Sony CMOS is used on Sony's own micro-single, and the CMOS is always on during working hours. When Nikon SLR is used, CMOS is always off. In other words, in principle, the same CMOS should perform better on SLR. Because there will be no noise floor caused by thermal reaction.

One of my video classmates said that he would never use micro-single. It must be a SLR to take pictures, and the camera can take pictures.

Is Sony's CMOS really good? Please don't just look at pixels. Please don't just look at the evaluation of DXO.

2. How about high pixels? I made a long article to explain the problem. In 9 1 photo website. Here, I will simply repeat it.

What is the relationship between image resolution and pixels?

Distinguishing is definitely not as simple as the above two respondents answered. To sum up briefly, resolution is affected by two factors: lens resolution and sensor resolution.

The resolution of the sensor determines the size of the printout. For example, the sensor of Sony A7R is 7360*49 12. If the printing resolution is 300DPI, a picture with a side length of 623 mm can be output. ..

The resolution of the sensor also determines the corresponding resolution of the lens. For example, the sensor of Sony A7R is 7360*49 12, and the calculation method is 1/ pixel size *2.

According to the calculation, the resolution requirement of the lens is 102 line pair /mm, that is, when the lens resolution reaches 102 line pair /mm, the resolution of CMOS can be brought into full play, while if the scene frequency is 102 line pair /mm, diffraction will occur. 102 line pair /mm is the sensor resolution of Sony A7R. If the frequency from the site is higher than 102 line pair /mm, A7R cannot be distinguished.

Considering the actual situation of avoiding diffraction, it is reasonable to reduce the resolution of the lens by 50%. That is 50 pairs/mm.

However, modern optical engineering can't design a product with a resolution of 50 line pairs /mm for the sensor area of 36 x 24 mm Leica's standard is 40 line pairs /mm, and Sony's standard is 30 line pairs /mm. It is said that Sony's internal measurement standard is 50 line pairs/mm, but it has never been published.

Therefore, the resolution of the current lens determines the real resolution that the camera can obtain; The resolution of CMOS determines the printing size.

However, there are more CMOS in the same area, which means that the performance of each CMOS will decline again. Even when Sony heard that Panasonic was developing an 8K camera, it stood up and publicly opposed this practice. And A7S can become the king of dark light by reducing pixels. It seems that Sony is as clear as Spiegel that more pixels are not justice. After all, they are the ones who really design cameras. Qualified in science and engineering.

3. Is it really necessary for 3.APS to change the full width?

I bought EOS 1DS MK2 first, then EOS5D2, and finally EOS 100D a few months ago. Return to APS-C from users with three full-width machines.

I'm not a brain cramp, but a sound brain. There must be my reasons for doing so. It is also based on my experience in using cameras.

The specific reasons are too complicated. Anyway, I made it clear in my smelly and long article.

Conclusion:

I quite agree with a friend upstairs. I suggest you have two sets of Nikon fuselage. It doesn't matter if you are full of dissatisfaction, as long as it is reliable. Two bodies are the same system, which is the king of photography.

Just like the guns of warships, they must be of the same caliber.

Convenient!

I suggest choosing Sony for the following reasons:

1. Video shooting is extremely popular now, so it is inevitable to shoot more videos frequently. However, shooting video with SLR has certain limitations, and the video shot is not ideal. Take me for example. I used to use Nikon D90 (with 18- 105 lens) and now I use D750 (lens 24-70VR2.8E).

However, this is not the case when they are used to shoot videos. In the process of shooting video, zooming and focusing (focusing) operations will be carried out from time to time, which is easy to cause vibration and difficult to control, and the shot video image will be unstable, jitter, unprofessional and have a bad experience.

2. Why choose Sony? Cameras, equipment for shooting videos, are the best in this field. None of them. In previous cameras, the photosensitive elements were generally very small, such as 11.7 inch,1inch and so on. The depth of video shooting is very deep, lacking a sense of film with shallow depth. Recently, I began to study cameras and found that cameras also have APS-. That's great. These machines are like Sony NEX-VG900E full-frame cameras.

This camera is quite powerful and easy to control. When the SLR is used, the strength is not bad. The 24.3-megapixel still photo is quite satisfactory, which is equivalent to D750. Taking pictures is enough. I wish I had found it last year. At that time, I didn't know that the camera could still take photos of Quan Huafu, so I upgraded the camera and bought D750+2470VR2.8E. If I won't buy it now, it's too late now. If you buy VG900E again, you will face repeated investment in changing doors and equipment, which will make D750 face the embarrassment that heroes are useless. Besides, it's tiring and inconvenient to take too much equipment when going out to shoot. If you don't have many Nikon lenses and want to take pictures, Sony is a better choice, so the overall budget will not be wasted.

3. The weight of NEX-VG 900e is not too heavy. The weight of fuselage 856g is similar to that of D750(840g), so it won't be too heavy to carry when going out, and it can be used in many places.

D7 100 is actually an upgraded version of D90. If you are a plane, you can say that you are going into battle lightly. Even it is a good choice to change doors and start using a camera with interchangeable lenses similar to NEX-VG900E Quan Huafu. After all, video shooting will become more and more mainstream in the future. The photos I sent before were generally only seen by dozens or hundreds of people. A few days ago, I sent a very general short video, with an average of 3000. The following is a screenshot after sending the video.

This is actually a general trend of focusing on making videos. To tell you the truth, I actually like Nikon. After all, I have used Nikon for more than ten years and always feel very comfortable. Some time ago, I really wanted to start with Nikon D850, but the idea of making videos made me waver, so I chose Sony!

This is my personal opinion. What do you think, Nikon or Sony? Welcome to express your opinions or clap bricks. what do you think?

Let me analyze your question for you:

1. How much can the image quality in Quan Huafu be improved?

If half of the flagship fuselage is the same lens, the picture quality really hasn't improved.

If you really want to improve the image quality, upgrading the lens will get better results.

2.2. Is CMOS the strongest in Sony?

As far as the production process is concerned, it is true. In the past, both Canon and Nikon were made by Sony. At present, after several years of research and development, Canon has been able to independently develop coms.

However, the coms adjustment of each family is different, so there will be subtle differences in color. However, there is no difference between sharpness and detail, so if I choose a machine, I will not care about its CMOS problem, but will look at the continuous shooting, focusing speed and ability, and high-quality image quality.

3. I did it three times. A7R2 surpasses D8 10?

Personally, I don't think A7R2 is completely superior. At least A7R2 is not suitable for co-production of sports themes. The waiting time for black screen in continuous shooting is relatively long, so it takes a long time to save a 4200W ARW format with 1 SD card. These questions seem to be only suitable for portraits and landscape themes. At the beginning of production, D8 10 started with the equipment of universal oil. You can use it to shoot sports themes, portraits and landscapes. The quality is good under a high sense, and it is no problem to shoot the stars. The fuselage is all aluminum alloy, which is suitable for more shooting environments.

4. Will no reversal replace SLR?

5. Will it be lighter than a SLR?

Personally, A7R2+35MM F2.8 is indeed lighter than SLR, but if it is converted to 70-200, you will find that everything is insignificant compared with the length of telephoto lens.

7. Final choice.

If you are shooting amateurs, not professionals, you should choose Sony. Who doesn't like fashionable black technology? Isn't it?

Since you have been using Nikon's machines, and you plan to upgrade the equipment, and it is still relatively light, then Nikon's latest Quan Huafu micro-single Z7 is definitely a good choice for you!

Let's take a look at some films I shot with Nikon Z7:

Let's talk about experience first:

The most attractive places of Z7 are summarized as follows: the body is small and light, which reduces the burden of travel photography; Strong tolerance and high sensitivity, and the image quality is more perfect under high light exposure than low light exposure; The fuselage has balanced performance, convenient operation, practicality and reliability; Perfect use of Nikon F-mount lens through adapter ring.

Z7 is a "Little King Kong", with a small figure and great energy. You can use all your old photos of Quan Huafu.

To sum up: Z7 is a very powerful product, which inherits the advantages and core performance of Nikon D850, while maintaining the lightweight of the body and lens. Light photographic equipment is the development trend. For friends who have requirements on weight, pixel and image quality, Z7 is definitely a very good choice.

The micro-list of Dafa is really strong and developing very rapidly. But considering your situation comprehensively, Xiao K's personal suggestion is to give priority to Nikon. The reason for this is the following：

Although 7 100 is half angle and 800 series is full angle, the control mode and menu setting are basically the same. Have the control foundation of 7 100, and be familiar with the operation of full width machine in a short time. After understanding, you will find that there are more than 800 models of full-frame machines with more physical buttons, which are more convenient to control and have obvious effects on improving shooting efficiency:

The menu design of Dafa is not very prominent in operating efficiency. Although we have realized this problem and actively improved it in subsequent models, compared with Nikon and Canon, it is still a bit lacking in humanization and operation efficiency. Interested friends can look at the instructions of two comparable models and feel it:

Digital camera is not only a shooting tool, but also a precise photoelectric instrument (K). Not only should its performance meet the requirements, but its feel, quality and durability are also very important. As an old optical factory that has accumulated for decades, the rationality and convenience of ergonomic design and menu compilation of Nikon SLR are very mature:

Speaking of quality, although word-of-mouth has been affected by some quality incidents in recent years, the overall quality can still be trusted. Especially in terms of durability, as a high-end full-width 800 series machine, it is very prominent, and there are generally hundreds of thousands of shutters. Even if the shutter life exceeds the expected life, the shutter accuracy can still be maintained at a fairly good level:

In recent years, Dafa has made great efforts on the camera and developed some new Quan Huafu heads with the help of the old foundation left by Minolta era. Xiao K's exposure to Dafa lens is not enough, but according to the online evaluation data, the performance of the new lens is still very good, but the price is really not cheap. The subject did a lot of homework before asking questions, and learned that only a dozen shots are needed to fully release the high pixel intensity of D8 10. However, personally, as long as there is a shot with a main theme, a dozen choices are completely enough. There are not many shots, but the essence. After all, the high pixel size of 3600w is necessary to improve the fineness of the picture, post-editing, submission and so on.

As the world's leading manufacturer of electronic photosensitive components, Dafa has reason to provide better CMOS components for its products, but the production and adjustment of CMOS are not entirely a concept. Nikon has much more experience in this field, not only in hardware circuit design, but also in software debugging.

Finally, the video capability of Dafa full-frame machine is better than Nikon's. Whether it is focus tracking or picture fluency, if the subject is very concerned about the quality of video shooting, he can reconsider.

Personal suggestions, for reference only, hope to help:

At present, among the full-frame cameras, Canon and SLR are mainly SLR cameras, while Sony is mainly engaged in Quan Huafu micro single camera and a99II single camera. First of all, if you are a professional photographer, use a camera for work and have high requirements for equipment, I think it is more reliable to choose a SLR camera. On the one hand, it is more professional in handling and feel, and has better endurance and reliability. However, if it is only for daily use, you can choose the micro-single, because the sensors are all Quan Huafu, so the picture quality is similar, but the micro-single body is smaller and more convenient to carry around. The following are several Quan Huafu products introduced by various companies for your reference.

Canon Quan Huafu SLR: EOS 5D Mark 4

Canon EOS 5D Mark IV is a Quan Huafu SLR camera equipped with a full-pixel dual-core CMOS image sensor. The effective pixel is about 30.4 million, and the common sensitivity is ISO 100-32000, which can be extended to 102400. The powerful performance of DIGIC 6+ processor of Canon EOS 5D Mark IV reduces noise.

Canon EOS 5D Mark IV has a 6 1 point (maximum 4 1 cross-focus) phase difference detection autofocus system. With the newly developed RGB+ infrared photometric sensor with about 1.5 million pixels, the focusing accuracy is by going up one flight of stairs. Up to about 7 frames per second, continuous shooting performance and powerful focus tracking system complement each other, which can capture various high-speed movements. At the same time, 5D Mark IV has added 3.2-inch touch screen and WiFi wireless transmission function, which enhances durability and ease of use.

Nikon Quan Huafu SLR: D8 10

Nikon D8/KOOC-0/0' s 36.35 megapixel Quan Huafu FX CMOS sensor has no low-pass filter dust removal system, is compatible with Nikon's shadow capture craftsman software, and supports shooting/KOOC-0/920×/KOOC-0/080 video with an EXPEED4 image processor. Nikon D8 10' s Multi-CAM 3500FX auto-sensing module has 5 1 autofocus points, including 15 cross focus points, which supports 3D tracking and focusing. Nikon D8 10 adopts TTL exposure metering system and 9 1K pixel RGB sensor, which supports matrix metering, color matrix metering III and 3D color matrix metering III. Its sensitivity range is ISO 100-ISO 12800, which can be extended to ISO 32-ISO 5 1200.

Nikon D8 10 adopts electronically controlled longitudinal focal plane shutter, supports B-door mode, and supports 2-second, 5-second, 10-second and 20-second delayed self-timer. The maximum continuous shooting speed is about 5 frames per second. The built-in GPS module can share location information in real time. Its battery is fully charged and can take 850 photos, with strong endurance.

Sony Quan Huafu micro-single: A7RII

Sony A7RII adopts 35mm Quan Huafu Exmor R CMOS back-illuminated image sensor, with an effective pixel of about 42.4 million. The function of low-pass filter is cancelled, and each picture is accurately restored. The common sensitivity range is ISO 100-25600, which can be extended to ISO50-ISO 102400. A7RII focusing module adopts 399 phase detection autofocus points and 25 contrast detection autofocus points, which lays a solid foundation for high image quality. Continuous shooting speed is about 5 frames per second.

In order to ensure the safe shutter speed of high-pixel shooting, A7RII added a 5-axis anti-shake function, which effectively compensated the jitter caused by hand-held shooting. At the same time, 5-axis anti-shake can also reflect the effect of video shooting, so that the picture has a good sense of breathing. It can shoot 120fps upgrade video in 4K and 720P HD modes. The addition of magnesium alloy fuselage and EVF electronic viewfinder makes A7RII more durable.

Obviously, the landlord is the equipment controller. Seriously, what you have learned is of little use. If you want to upgrade your camera, it is necessary to be fully equipped. Then I will only consider which camera has a better focusing system and the highest market share, and the others are not within my consideration. What are you talking about? Sony micro-single has the momentum to catch up with SLR, and it is only limited to those so-called "black technologies". It and SLR are actually things in two fields. At least professional photographers still use Canon or Nikon, and professional photographers will basically choose Sony. A camera is a camera. If you don't play video, a SLR with mature technology and stable and reliable performance is the right choice. Don't mess with those useless people. Of course, you can be willful if you have more money. Many years later, you will find that many new technologies promoted by manufacturers now make you feel that there are no eggs to use, and even those new technologies only appear in the products you buy. I'm not saying Sony is not good. Sony's electronic control and intelligent technology are really awesome. Just think clearly. Do you really need or use those things?

(The picture was taken with a mobile phone for fun, don't take it seriously.)

I can see that the topic is extremely tangled, ha.

I have answered many similar questions and been scolded by many Sony fans during this time, but I still stick to my principles, ha.

Before, I didn't talk about Sony. I only said the advantages and disadvantages of Nikon, and let others choose for themselves. This time, I'll look at it from a different angle, just like photography. I can't get it from the same angle, right?

Micro-bill, a special term, is a special trademark registered by Sony in Chinese mainland. Others can only call it a single, but it can't be called a micro-single. As the name implies, the micro-single camera is a miniature and compact single-lens camera, which is a cross-border product between the card machine and the SLR. The target users are also amateurs and home consumers. In fact, up to now, although Sony has become a "Dafa", its main consumer groups are really the same as it, indicating that its positioning is quite accurate.

As we all know, the difference between micro-single and SLR is that the reflective component is cancelled, because the reflective component is a product of the film age, because it has strict sealing requirements and needs to separate exposure from framing, but digital COMS is different. It can be viewed directly through COMS, and then the exposure is cleared. What I want to say here is not that this kind of framing is not good, but what you all ignore: sealing.

Judging from the description of the subject, it is a "nitpicking" of the image quality and is going to change the camera. "nitpicking" is basically the reason for every comrade who plays photography to change cameras, and the reason for changing cameras will not be just because of the image quality. As you can see, the pixels of real professional cameras are not high, and Nikon's D5 is only over 20 million. Why is it so expensive and desirable? Professional cameras pay attention to: stability, reliability and all-weather work.

A fact that speaks louder than words: mobile phones have indeed replaced the existence of card machines. Can micro-singles replace SLR? At least not yet. As for the future, no one dares to say, who knows how "black" that technology is!

The main topic is to change Nikon, but I suggest that it should be D850 directly, and it will cost several thousand yuan more, not upgrade!

Today is Dragon Boat Festival, I wish you all a happy holiday!