Can Sony Micro A7R4 with 24- 105mmf4 lens meet the demand of high pixels?

Can Sony Micro A7R4 with 24- 105mmf4 lens meet the demand of high pixels?

Sony 24- 105mmF4.0

What is the performance of F8.0?

Hello, if you have to be 100% serious, Sony 24- 105mmF4.0 may still be a little inferior, and it is unlikely to give play to the advantages of Sony A7R4.

Generally speaking, however, Sony 24- 105mmF4.0 can actually satisfy Sony A7R4.

It's a bit of a mouthful, isn't it?

In fact, the most important thing is that you really need a high-pixel subject. In most cases, a large aperture is not needed, or a full aperture is not needed.

For example, although Sony GM24-70mmF2.8 is reduced to F4.0, the image quality is still better than the full aperture F4.0 of 24-105 MMF4.0. ..

But the problem is that subjects who really need high pixels, such as landscape photography, often use the aperture of F8.0 or F 1 1 to shoot.

For another example, the aperture of flash studio and shed shooting is about F 1 1.

Under the aperture of F8.0 and F 1 1, the image quality difference of this lens is actually very weak.

In particular, Sony 24- 105mmF4.0 is not a pure amateur lens.

At present, the imaging quality of 24- 105mmF4.0 in recent years, regardless of the manufacturer, is the latest model, which is better than the old 24-105mmf4.0. ..

So you can use 24- 105mmF4.0 with Sony A7R4 to shoot!

Don't worry!

If you really worry too much and feel uneasy, how can you get rich and buy more expensive and professional lenses in the future?

These are four fixed-focus lenses commonly used in my daily life, namely Canon EF300mm f/2.8L II, Sigma Black Technology Representative 105art, Canon EF50mm f/ 1.2L, and Canon EF-M 32mm f/ 1.4stm lens. These four lenses are excellent fixed-focus lenses.

The two camera bodies currently used by Brother Mouse are Canon 1DX and Canon M50. Canon 1DX is a Quan Huafu digital SLR with180,000 pixels. M50 is a miniature camera in APS-C format with 24 million pixels. Because Canon's APS-C frame is 1.6X coefficient, M50 is equivalent to 63 million pixels in Quan Huafu, only a little higher than your a7r4 pixel per inch.

So what's the feeling of using these lenses on 1DX and M50?

1, even with a lens like EF50mm f/ 1.2L and a full aperture f/ 1.2, shooting at the same distance, M50 can get more details than 1DX. Therefore, compared with the low-pixel fuselage, the high-pixel fuselage generally has advantages in details. A lens like 24- 105G, with your R4, will definitely get better details than a7R3 and a7M3.

2, but high pixel is a double-edged sword. The frame with high pixel per inch is generally gray and pink. Even a lens like Sigma 105mm f/ 1.4art is hung on M50, no matter how you reduce it, you can't achieve the stereoscopic effect of low pixel 1DX.

High pixel models such as 1 and a7r4 are not equal to the best picture quality. Blind pursuit of high pixels sacrifices color, layering and high sensitivity.

2. There is no need to stick to the question of "full shot", because 24- 105G is a strong model in Sony's original zoom lens. Of course, it can't reach the image quality of 105 artistic fixed focus, and it will definitely be a little mushy when magnified by 100% on a7r4, but there is no better alternative at present.

A: I am using a Sony 24- 105mmf4 lens, but the fuselage is A7R3. Now I send some photos and original screenshots. These are all hand-held shots.

This is across the street100 mm.

This is a 200% screenshot.

This is a screenshot of 100%. It's been fixed. In this one, she didn't put on false eyelashes.

This is a screenshot of 100% of the RAW file, and it has not been modified. For future convenience, the contrast and saturation are reduced, and the dark part (hair) is brightened. Portrait, brightness contrast and saturation are all selected in the camera's photo style settings.

No problem. 24 105 is of good quality.

of course can