What should a novice buy when he enters the SLR?

Because of your mentality … SLR is not as simple and complicated as you think, and you can't take good photos without foundation.

Indeed, considering professional photography, most of today's "beautiful photos" are taken by SLR, but there are too many external factors.

For example, photography technology, or you can directly summarize it as "SLR technology", which is the most important factor to determine a good photo.

Without technology, what you shoot with a SLR may not be as good as a mid-range card machine of one or two thousand yuan.

SLR is the ultimate photographic equipment. It doesn't have many "automatic" things, you can only make up for it with photography.

And learning technology is not a simple matter, even the first step of learning SLR-thick instructions are very troublesome.

If you play for a month, it's good that you can shoot at the same level as one or two thousand card machines ... and you play hard.

But if you want to reach the level of micro-single or single-power, you need to be talented and spend more time studying.

If you play a good SLR, you can certainly take more beautiful photos than the micro-single, but it takes too much time.

If you can't play the SLR well, the photos you take are not even as good as the micro-single, and many people may not be as good as the micro-single after playing for a lifetime.

The ability to appreciate beauty, the ability to apply mathematics and logic to photography, and the intuition to judge light and color-

These things are gifts, things you can't get through learning and accumulating experience, and the most important thing to play SLR.

You can't know if you have these before you play SLR. Without these, your work will be seriously affected. This is an uncertain factor.

So it's more like a gamble ... You invest a lot of time and money, but it's only because of "talent" that you will succeed.

Second,

The fuselage problem, since you have enough money, just go to 650D, which is the latest, and the optical components are better than 550D and 600D.

Unfortunately, I have never used 650D myself, so I can't tell you the advantages of 650D over 550D and 600D.

But what is certain is that it has been greatly upgraded in optical components and done better in important aspects such as high sensitivity.

It's not much more expensive than 600D, but it's better than 600D, which is the best reason for you to buy 650D-it's really better.

However, I would still recommend you to buy 60D and 650D. No matter how good it is, it is an entry-level machine, and its function is far less than that of 60D.

SLR is almost divided into four categories-entry machine (650D), mid-range machine (60D), quasi-professional machine (5D) and professional machine (1D).

Often, "imaging" is not the decisive factor of photography, and some hardware improvements can only be achieved if we go beyond it.

60D is an entry-level choice for playing major, while 650D removes the word "playing major" and becomes an entry-level choice directly.

If you plan to have fun and develop professionally, please go directly for 60 days, which is good for you.

And you're not going to play professionally, or you don't even know how to play … then buy 650D, which is not bad.

Third,

As for the shots, I won't list them one by one, which means nothing to you now.

You are a novice, and you don't even know how to choose the lens and what the parameters of the lens mean.

You should choose the cheapest 18-55 camera lens, which is the cheapest lens and meaningful.

It's the cheapest, and the focal length 18-55 is your most commonly used. You can eat almost any subject except telephoto.

I don't know how many times I have said it on Baidu … 18-55. Best for beginners.

If you buy 18- 135 or 18-200, you will know how much money you have wasted in less than a year.

In particular, it's foolish of you to waste money on this low-end camera lens, which is not worth wasting at all.

18-55 is enough for you as a beginner, while 18- 135 and 18-200 are just a little more in the focus part.

These three lenses are the worst dog heads. You absolutely don't need to spend one or two thousand more to buy a "slightly better junk lens".

As for the expensive lens, don't consider it now. Can't play, buy a pure waste.

18-55 camera lens, plus a 50mm/f 1.8 fixed-focus lens, which is your first choice as a rookie.

You can play for at least one year, you have at least one subject with medium focus and wide angle, and you can also shoot works with shallow depth of field.

Third,

I have to admit, your fifty cents gave me great motivation to answer … then answer some of your questions one by one.

1. As for Nikon, you can only choose a camera above the mid-range starting from D90. Keywords: autofocus, it hurts,

Take a closer look at my previous answer about "entry machine selection", and you will understand why you are not allowed to choose Nikon's entry machine.

2. As for the life of SLR, as long as you use an entry-level machine carefully, you won't have much problem after playing for many years.

For example, a friend of mine majoring in photography, his first machine was 550D, which was used for five years and finally given away …

It's been used for five years, and it's not broken, at least it's good enough to be given away. I have to say that its life is really long.

3. Shooting in the rain or something … Do you really have the heart to stand in the rain and shoot with a camera? Not afraid of catching a cold? This is really bad,

Even if there is no water in your machine, its internal components may be accelerated by moisture, which is highly recommended!

If you must shoot in the rain, you can buy a waterproof canvas or something and wrap it for the camera, which is more reliable …

Canon's red ring lens mount has a waterproof rubber ring, but the instructions still say "Please try to avoid shooting in the rain".