The word-of-mouth of brilliant turn is polarized, and the advantages and disadvantages are clear at a glance. Do you feel the same way?

As an urban expert, I feel the same way about the word-of-mouth polarization in The Brilliant Turn:

Compassion:

1. The play has advantages in telling love stories. For example, the process of the hero and heroine meeting for the first time and knowing each other and falling in love is delicate and touching, which makes people feel * * *; Film pictures and music also create a romantic and dreamy atmosphere, which is in line with the positioning of this type of film.

2. However, the logical rigor and characterization of the play are slightly insufficient, which is also the reason for the polarization of word of mouth. For example, the protagonist Allen is too idealistic and lacks realism; Many plots are too simplistic and nuanced.

Different feelings:

1. Although drama has advantages in telling love, as an urban youth, I prefer those realistic love movies that blend into the atmosphere of urban life. The Brilliant Turn is too idealistic and dreamy, and it seems to be somewhat divorced from modern urban life, which makes it difficult for me to produce a profound song.

The love depicted in the play is too sweet and traditional. As a modern urbanite, I prefer those love stories that are plain and natural, full of personality and trendy. The love mode described in "Brilliant Turn" is more traditional, which can't make me feel the same, and there is no strong sense of substitution.

3. Although movies are aimed at female audiences, the hobbies and perspectives of urban women are becoming more and more modern. They are no longer satisfied with over-idealized, anodyne love, but prefer real, challenging and personalized emotional stories. This is also one of the reasons for the polarization of word-of-mouth among urban audiences.

To sum up, I feel the same way about the word-of-mouth polarization of The Brilliant Turn, because as a love movie with urban theme, its storytelling techniques and shaping objects do not fully meet the aesthetics and expectations of modern urban audiences. If more urban flavor and modernity can be integrated into the follow-up works, the communication and sound power of the works will be greatly improved. This is also my sincere suggestion as a city audience.

I explained my understanding and views on the word-of-mouth polarization of this film from the perspective of urban audiences. Although I feel the same way, my appreciation of movies is different because of the difference between urban background and modern aesthetics. I hope to share with you the unique perspective of the city audience. If you are interested, you can further explore how this kind of film and television works cater to the tastes of urban audiences and other related topics.