[Stars are gone] Whose fault is it?

In view of Gillian being photographed, the rights and wrongs are quite obvious. Artists are victims, and people unanimously point the finger of accountability at the "paparazzi" who took candid photos. Undoubtedly, those "paparazzi" holding "long guns and short guns" staring at the star's private houses from a distance, holding camera phones to find all kinds of abnormal shooting angles, and even using pinhole cameras for remote control are directly responsible for the candid camera incident. The social conscience and professional ethics of the "paparazzi" have been strongly denounced by the public with the exposure of each candid camera, but the condemnation belongs to condemnation. "Paparazzi" has broken the bottom line of privacy from taking pictures of celebrities' marriage, eating and living, taking pictures of clothes and taking a bath, and its behavior has not converged at all. What is the reason?

Behind the lack of morality of the "paparazzi" is the public's concern for the stars. The best example is that A Book Convenient, which secretly filmed Gillian changing clothes, is so popular that it must be printed to meet the market demand. The audience's attitude of "smelling and eating incense" in the candid camera incident actually reflects the misunderstanding of entertainment in today's society. The ultimate goal of entertainment is to meet the spiritual needs of the audience, but with the fierce competition, more and more entertainment practitioners are ignoring the audience's high-level artistic enjoyment and highlighting the sensory stimulation to the audience. This "small investment, quick results" business operation makes the stars break away from art and become the protagonists of entertainment, while art forms such as movies, music and television become the "foil" of the stars. In this way, the audience thinks that they have a complete "right to know" about the stars, just like analyzing the lens of a movie and the melody of music, and always want to see it more clearly. Therefore, the more naked the star is, the more explicit the candid shot is, and the more satisfied the audience's "consumption desire" for the star will be.

Since sneak shots satisfy the media's selfish desires and exposure meets the audience's requirements for entertainment, some victims have also learned to be smart. Why should your light be "stolen" by others? It's better to turn passivity into initiative and touch your own light. As a result, some artists deliberately wear miniskirts that can't be shorter and see-through clothes that can't be thinner to "give way", so that seemingly humiliating mistakes can win the real "eyeball economy" and secretly become victims.