What lenses can the camera turn?

Can Fuji camera be changed to Nikon lens? With what adapter ring?

As long as the flange distance is long enough, the lens can be switched.

The flange distance of Nikon SLR lens is very long, so it is possible to replace it with Fuji camera.

Can a7c switch to Canon SLR lens to shoot video?

.a7 Transfer the old lens

Yes, but you need to add a lens adapter.

Sony E lens is comparable to Sony) a7 Features:

Xtrfine LCD screen; You can turn up about 90 degrees and turn down about 45 degrees; Display: graphic display, displaying all information, but not information, digital horizontal ruler and histogram; Peak detection: supported (peak level: high/medium/low/off, peak color: red/yellow/white); Magnification: 5.9 times/1 1.7 times (Quan Huafu) and 3.8 times /7.7 times (aps-c).

Parameters:

The effective pixel is 24.3 million pixels.

Digital zoom multiple 4 times digital zoom

Sensor cmos sensor

2.a7r3 to Canon lens evaluation

Select Sony a7r3. All right.

Sony A7R3 is much more cost-effective than Canon EOSR5.

2, Canon 5DS series high pixel body, high sense and tolerance, dynamic range, color gamut, in fact, are very general, not the opponent of Sony high pixel body.

3, Sony A7R4, the current pixel count is much higher than Canon EOSR5.

3.a7c connected to Canon lens

Sony A7 series micro camera can be connected to Canon lens, but it must be connected through bayonet conversion adapter (adapter ring). Sony A7 series micro-cameras use E-mount, and Canon lenses use EF-mount, which are incompatible. However, the flange distance is relatively short, so it has advantages in connecting the lens and other bases through the adapter ring. At present, EF-E adapter rings produced by many third-party manufacturers on the market are infinitely close to perfect compatibility.

4.a7 recommended to switch to old lens

Zhuo Wei's is ok, 600 yuan. There are also good ones. Metabones Canon ef to Sony nex(e) autofocus adapter ring a7r/a7r2/s/m24, the price is about 2900.

5. How to use Sony a7 manual lens?

Of course. Sony e-mount camera has a short flange distance of 18mm, which can theoretically transfer all SLR lenses. Nikon F-mount lens can realize all automatic functions only if the products with built-in focus motor (that is, all lenses starting with Nikon AF-S and AF-P) are electronically rotated. Other AF, AI and AIS lenses can only be focused manually.

6.a7r connects with Canon lens.

Shortcomings (deficiencies) of A7R

First of all, there are few local shots

A7R is a bayonet, which is usually used with Zeiss head, but there are really not many lens styles, which is very unhappy for friends with fever, but this problem can be solved by adapter. Of course, for A7R with no "anti-shake" function, although the adapter can solve the lens problem, the stability requires the photographer's technology. Switching Nikon lens will lose autofocus function, and switching Canon lens will keep autofocus (legend). Connecting the old A-port lens will seriously affect the image quality, and the machine's ability will not be exerted. Interpretation in a word: A7R has few original lenses, and the adapter can solve it, but after all, it is grafted, and the function and picture stability are a problem.

Second, the battery life is poor

Feedback from users and storefronts shows that a battery can shoot more than 200 pictures, but less than 300 pictures, which is solved by the handle. Interpretation in a word: The A7R will increase its weight after adding the handle, which goes against the original intention of light and portable battery.

Summary: regardless of the price, A7R is one of the best single batteries at present. Shooting static scenes is mostly, and A7R is a good choice. Equipped with FE28-70 Zeiss Yuntai, it is enough for daily entertainment, and the price is about 1.4W. However, if deep playback is pursued, the price of A7R at1.4w is not very suitable.

Judging from the above evaluation information, Sony A7R camera has many advantages, such as high pixel and high picture quality, which can compete with SLR. The weight of the fuselage is much lighter than that of ordinary SLR, which is convenient for travel and carrying. Of course, netizens also found some shortcomings, just like this camera doesn't work well when shooting static scenes, and there are not many lens styles; The endurance is not strong, and it is easy to run out of electricity; The price is higher. But compared with the advantages, these shortcomings of Sony camera are not enough for photographers, and it is a good choice for friends who want to buy a camera.

7.a7m3 Transfer the old lens

Sony a7m3 can use Nikon SLR lens through special bayonet adapter ring. Sony A series micro-cameras use Sony E-mount, and the short flange distance of E-mount enables it to transfer SLR lenses with long flange distance. It is recommended to buy the adapter ring produced by the original factory to reduce the compatibility risk.

8. Sony a7s connected to Canon lens

Canon EOSRvs Sony A7M3

Now, a micro-blowout has broken out in Quan Huafu. Among the first products on the market, Nikon chose to benchmark Sony A7RM3 point-to-point, and Canon EOSR corresponds to Sony A7M3 in price, but it is a dislocation competition in function. Now the RAW file of EOSR can be completely decoded. Let's take a look at the differences in image quality and core performance between Canon EOSR and Sony A7M3, which are listed at the same price 15000 yuan.

Speaking of Quan Huafu micro-single, let's start with Sony. Sony released A7 and A7R in June of 20 13, and continuously updated the fuselage of three generations in less than five years, which played an important role in upgrading the fuselage of Quan Huafu Micro Single. From the functional point of view, Canon EOSR uses 30.3 million pixels, and the camera foundation is very similar to Canon 5D4, so it is not consistent with A7M3 in positioning. Sony takes a low-pixel, high-speed and moderate route, and Canon EOSR is a camera positioning with balanced image quality and emphasis on shooting experience. However, the listing price of the first batch of EOSR with adapter ring in China is 15999 yuan, which is basically close to the listing price of Sony A7M3. So from the price point of view, the two cameras are price competition.

Canon EOSR and Sony A7M3 are almost priced, and they are tit-for-tat cameras for consumers.

For ordinary consumers, the first intuitive feeling is 30.3 million pixels vs 2400 million pixels. Both of them are Quan Huafu micro-images, and the pixels determine the camera positioning. Canon EOSR has 30.3 million pixels, which is the bottom line of high pixel models according to the current definition, and can meet the output requirements of large-size photos. Sony A7M3 is a traditional 24 million pixels, which sacrifices the large-size output ability of photos. Don't say anything else at the beginning of this article. Let's take a look at the image quality comparison between the two cameras.

Comparison of high sensitivity between Canon EOSR and Sony A7M3.

Canon EOSR and Sony A7M3 High Sensitivity Contrast (RAW)

The actual pixel difference between the two cameras is 6 million. In theory, Sony should have better high sensitivity. But from the actual performance, whether it is the direct performance of JPG or the detail retention ability of RAW file. The two cameras are basically on a horizontal line. In other words, Sony A7M3 didn't sacrifice pixels to get better picture quality. On the contrary, EOSR can still maintain excellent image quality output at high pixels, which is commendable.

High sensitivity performance is a very vague concept. Whether some test laboratories use digital measurement results or we use pictures directly for comparison, the core is the visual viewing experience. Intuitively speaking, Canon EOSR and Sony A7M3 have little difference in picture quality details when shooting. Whether it is the ability to retain details or the purity of the picture, it belongs to the first echelon of the current full-frame camera. But Canon can use 30.3 million pixels to achieve noise control close to 24 million pixels. The hard power of the sensor and the computing power of the processor should not be underestimated.

Cameras are not everything. As we all know, Sony's specialty is tolerance, but EOSR's tolerance has also left a deep impression in use. As far as tolerance is concerned, it has always been a controversial topic in the photography circle. Undoubtedly, high tolerance is more advantageous in scenery shooting, but what kind of tolerance is good in scenery shooting is not a clear concept. First of all, let's take a look at the objective comparison of the tolerance between Canon EOSR and Sony A7M3.

Tolerance comparison between Canon EOSR and Sony A7M3

As can be seen from the figure, there is no difference between Canon EOSR and Sony A7M3 in the exposure compensation state of-1 to -3EV. -3EV is basically the lower limit of daily use, while -4EV and -5EV are basically not satisfied in ordinary shooting, which is of little reference significance. So we can draw the conclusion that Canon EOSR has no shortcomings in terms of the endurance of Sony A7M3.

The Endurance Test of Sony A7M3 under Extreme Shooting Conditions

Even if we increase the sensitivity (theoretically, the higher the sensitivity, the worse the tolerance) and adjust the third gear to ISO 1600, the tolerance levels of the two cameras are actually very close, the details are well preserved and the color accuracy is good.

In the actual shooting, the two cameras lowered the cosmetic difference in the sunset environment. In fact, we can all get suitable photos through RAW files. For the real shooting environment, the dark details of Canon EOSR are basically the same as Sony A7M3.

In the real shooting environment, we reduced the three exposure shots at sunset, which is close to the common limit of normal shooting.

After adjustment, we can see that there is little difference in tolerance between Sony and Canon.

In fact, we took many photos with EOSR, including many environments with large light ratio. Judging from the photos, the tolerance of Canon EOSR is one of the most satisfactory places of this EOSR, which is enough for most landscape shooting.

Canon EOSR single Zhang Daguang ratio shooting

For landscape shooting, Canon EOSR's Bisogni A7M3 is 6 million pixels higher in pixels. In fact, we can see that there are still huge differences in the details of the two cameras. The 24- 105mm lens used by Canon EOSR is the best f/4 lens used by the author at present. In fact, the combination of Canon EOSR and 24- 105mm lens is very satisfactory in detail.

100% enlarged screenshot comparison

Canon EOSR has 6 million pixels more for scenery shooting, and with high-quality lens, it can get a higher upper limit shooting effect. Although Sony's 24 million pixels is enough, after all, in today's era of endless high-quality lenses, lower pixels restrict the upper limit of shooting to a certain extent, and A7M3 has not exchanged lower pixels for more solid high-sensitivity performance. Therefore, Canon EOSR is a retractable camera, which not only has good high-sensitivity image quality, but also has good tolerance performance. From a photographic point of view, this camera is more in line with the needs of mass consumers.

One reason why Sony A7M3 is praised is that this camera has a 693-point focusing system similar to A9 and continuous shooting performance of 10fps. In contrast, Canon EOSR pays more attention to the user's shooting experience. As the author said in the last article, after the emergence of EOSR full-pixel dual-core focusing, the competition for the number of focal points becomes meaningless. 5655 focal points are on call, and 88% of the focus coverage area makes shooting easier.

Canon EOSR continuous shooting test

Sony A7M3 continuous shooting Test

Continuous shooting speed is only one aspect. Canon EOSR and Sony A7M3 are relatively good in focusing accuracy. Judging from our actual shooting, both cameras can maintain a focus success rate of more than 95% when focusing. Comparatively speaking, there is little difference in hardware between the two cameras, but the biggest difference lies in the experience.

Canon EOSR captures after focusing, and the accuracy rate is over 90%.

Sony A7M3 back focus screenshot, the accuracy rate is also above 90%.

The most important thing to say three times is efficiency! Efficiency! Efficiency! First of all, Canon EOSR has a full-featured touch screen, while Sony A7M3 does not. Therefore, in actual shooting, although Sony can select the focus through the touch screen, more adjustments still depend on the buttons. Canon can rely on the touch screen to choose the focus position at will, and more manipulation is done by the touch screen.

Canon EOSR control can rely more on the screen.

Sony Touch is not easy to use, and it relies more on the focus direction lever on the back to quickly switch focus.

In terms of low light focusing, the low light performance of both cameras is good. Canon EOSR achieves -6EV low-light focusing at f/ 1.2 aperture, and Sony has no official data, which is generally considered as -3EV low-light focusing performance. In actual performance, both cameras can focus successfully in the low light environment we tested.

See the video for specific tests. 100% screenshot shows that the low-light focusing accuracy of both cameras is excellent.

See the video for specific tests. 100% screenshot shows that the low-light focusing accuracy of both cameras is excellent.

On the other hand, the stability of the two cameras is different. Sony A7M3 has body image stabilization, while Canon EOSR relies on lens image stabilization. Although fuselage anti-shake is the mainstream of development at this stage, lens anti-shake still has better anti-shake effect. We used a set of lens tests to compare the actual anti-shake effects of the two cameras. The optical effect of Canon 24- 105mm is better than that of Bisogni A7M3 and 24-70mmf/4.

Sony's combination is hybrid anti-shake, but 70 mm115s cannot be held by hand.

Canon EOSR has optical image stabilization, and 70 mm115s can be shot manually.

From the actual focusing performance, the continuous shooting speed of Canon camera is 5fps, but there is not much difference between the two cameras in focusing stability, accuracy and focusing speed. From the actual experience, Canon has an advantage that can be easily overlooked, that is, EOSR's screen display focus window is very accurate, and the infinity position is precisely limited, so we can trust the infinity symbol of the screen in extremely weak light environment, which Sony can't do.

Finally, talk about the fuselage and shooting experience of the two cameras. Let's start with Sony. Sony's fuselage structure has undergone three generations of optimization, and now it is a fuselage with obvious advantages and disadvantages. Sony A7 series is the smallest micro-single in Quan Huafu, slightly smaller than Canon EOSR and Nikon Z, and has a focus lever on the back, so it is the most abundant button model.

The size of the two cameras, Sony is smaller.

Unlike Sony, Sony itself lacks the design accumulation of professional-grade fuselage, and Canon is also lacking. Therefore, on the one hand, EOSR draws on the design of SLR cameras from some control habits and overall experience, on the other hand, it incorporates many Canon's own understanding of micro-single. Compared with Sony, Canon's body size is slightly larger, but it also brings a better grip. Compared with A7M3, the biggest feature of EOSR is its excellent screen experience. A7M3 screen is only a 3.0-inch 920,000-pixel screen, while EOSR is a 3.2-inch omni-directional flip touch screen with 265,438+10,000 pixels, which is actually very important for professional users, so the experience of EOSR is undoubtedly better in Bisogni A7M3.

In contrast, EOSR has a shoulder screen and a full-featured touch screen, which is more user-friendly.

EOSR's screen will leave a deep impression on users.

For shooting, the design concept of A7M3 is to provide a strong sense of capture, so it is often called "Little A9". Canon EOSR pays more attention to the shooting experience, so it has a more optimized design for shooting performance. Simply put, the color tendency and exposure control of EOSR are more in line with the photographic perception of mass consumers, and the color expression and light balance of the picture are better.

For ordinary consumers, besides camera lens, it is also an important factor affecting consumption. Sony FE lens is developing well now, but there is still a considerable gap compared with Canon EF lens group. Canon has a larger lens group support, and the newly developed RF lens bayonet has a larger physical size, making it easier to manufacture a fixed-focus lens with a large aperture and excellent image quality.

Canon not only has a brand-new RF lens, but also has an EF lens as a support, and the advantages of the lens group are very obvious.

At present, among Canon's RF lenses, 24- 105mmf/4 and 50mmf/ 1.2 are excellent lenses, and Canon also has a monster lens like RF28-70mmf/2, which is unimaginable for other micro-single users for the time being. It can be said that the follow-up development potential of Canon RF lens group is huge, which is one of the core competitiveness of Canon EOSR.

In a word, these two Quan Huafu micro-cameras represent high-level and high-full-frame cameras at this stage, which can meet the daily shooting needs of consumers. But in contrast, Canon EOSR is more suitable for mass consumers. It is a camera that can be bought with your eyes closed, and the lens selection is more abundant. Sony A7M3 is a personalized product, which pursues speed more and is more suitable for users who need high-speed continuous shooting.

9.a7r2 Transfer the old lens

Worth buying

A7r2 is cheap, and the color of salted fish is more than 6k. Compared with the same price, a7r2 is almost invincible, with high pixel, high color depth and high tolerance. Why is it almost the same? Because there are Nikon's SLR and so on, but a7r2' s camera lens is relatively light. Focus is ok, better than a7m2, eye control focus. The quality and performance of a7r2 video cutting are good, supporting slog2 and cutting 4K30P. The a7r2 lens group is powerful, and the deputy factory has a strong cost performance, and it can also turn to SLR lenses.

10. Sony a7 generation switched to Canon lens.

Sony a7s3 can use Canon EF lens, but it needs to install bayonet adapter ring. Sony a7s3 is Sony's micro-camera, which uses Sony's special e-bayonet for micro-camera. The short flange distance of E-mount allows it to install a mount adapter ring, so that it can adapt to a Canon EF mount SLR lens with a long flange distance through the adapter ring. It is recommended to choose the original installation adapter (adapter ring) for better compatibility.

1 1.A7 transfer

M gear, focus manually first, then set the aperture, and then adjust the shutter. You can see real-time imaging in the viewfinder.

Sony's real-time imaging makes the setting of exposure parameters much more convenient, which is a great comfort. However, I have to vomit. Is it because of the cost to choose Sony and play? It's hard to understand whether to buy a bayonet or an e bayonet.

Can A7r use Nikon lens through adapter ring?

A7r can use Nikon lens through adapter ring.

A7r is Sony's non-reflex, because there is no reflector, so the flange distance is very short 20 mm, while the flange distance of SLR is generally 40-50 mm, so that E can transfer almost all SLR lenses through the adapter ring. Of course, Nikon lenses can be transferred. It's just that non-Sony lenses can't focus automatically (the interface manufacturer's standards are too different).

A7r camera can use other brands of lenses, including Nikon lenses, through the adapter ring due to the flange distance. Because Sony's anti-focus system is different, some cameras support autofocus when switching, some cameras support partial autofocus when switching, and some cameras do not support autofocus when switching.

Extended data

Sony A7R has no phase difference focusing, only contrast focusing. The adapter ring is only used for manual focusing. No matter what lens you adjust, you can only focus manually, including Canon and Sigma lenses.

Sony has no A7R adapter for Nikon lens, so it can only focus manually (and does not support phase difference focusing). At present, the Sony A7R adapter rings used by Nikon are novoflex made in Germany and voigtlander made in Fu Lunda, while there are many cheap adapter rings, such as kipon adapter ring, General Shogunate adapter ring, light and shadow NikonF/SonyE adapter ring and so on.

Sony A7R supporting autofocus is A7M2 and later models. The adapter rings mb4 and mc 1 1 can be used to connect Canon and Sigma lenses to realize autofocus, while A7 and A6000 models with phase difference focusing but less phase focusing can partially support autofocus of Canon and Sigma lenses by using mb4 and mc 1 1 adapter rings.

Which F-mount lenses does Nikon z6 recommend?

Nikon Z6 can switch to Canon EF(EFS) lens (F-mount is Nikon SLR lens), but it cannot switch to Canon RF lens. The flange distance between RF lens and Z body is too short.

Z-mount fuselage turns into Canon EF lens. At present, the best automatic turning ring is tassel rEF-NZ turning ring. The tassel adapter ring has excellent performance, and all functions of Z fuselage are not damaged; Fringe adapter rings are available for sale; In addition, the Z fuselage can also use the original FTZ adapter ring to turn Nikon F SLR lens, Gabrielle adapter ring to turn Leica M-port lens, and Sky adapter ring to turn Sony E-mount lens.

brief introduction

Nikon, a famous Japanese camera manufacturer, was founded in 19 17, formerly known as Japan Optical Industry Co., Ltd.. 1988 Company changed its name to Nikon Co., Ltd. based on its camera brand.

The name "Nikon" used since 1946 is the Roman abbreviation of Japanese pronunciation of "Japanese optics", which is a combination of kon in ZeissIkon, a German camera.

Among Nikon's many camera products, the most important ones are Nichols camera lens, Nikon F series 135 film SLR camera, Nikon D series digital SLR camera, consumer digital camera Coolpix series and Nikon Z series digital micro-camera.

Can Canon SLR connect 3/4 lens?

Canon SLR can receive 3/4 lens, because according to the data, this brand of SLR is of high quality, and its lens is expensive, which can be spliced to some extent, so Canon SLR can receive 3/4 lens.

Nikon f-port SLR.

Fringer, a well-known adapter ring manufacturer, once again brought black technology and launched a new NF-GFX automatic adapter ring. This is an adapter ring, which can install Nikon F-port SLR lens on Fuji GFX series medium format cameras. Built-in aperture motor can realize autofocus of Nikon AF-S and AF-P lenses. In addition, it is also compatible with the phase focusing technology of GFX 100/ 100S fuselage users.

If it is a Fuji X series camera, you can consider Fringer's NF-FX adapter ring, and if it is a Fuji G series camera, you can consider STEELSRING's NF-GFX adapter ring, both of which are automatic adapters.