Comparison between Fujifilm X-Pro1 kit and Fujifilm FinePix X100s, which one is better?

X100s is a 35MM equivalent lens. If you focus on using the 35 focal length, X100s is enough. If you want to use lenses with focal lengths such as 28MM, 50MM, 90MM, etc., there is no doubt that the XPRO-1 is the one because you can change the lens.

As for the imaging effects, they are all Fujifilm products, so they are basically the same Fujifilm style. Moreover, XPRO1 is positioned as a high-end product and is weak in JPG direct output, because these cameras correspond to the late-stage cameras. Photographers and quasi-professionals, so they focus on recording a large amount of information in RAW format rather than JPG. The X100S is a civilian portable camera. Many ordinary users have no need for post-production, and most of them only need JPG direct output, so these civilian portable cameras focus on JPG direct output image quality.

So if you directly compare the JPG format, the X100S is obviously better than the XPRO1, but if both parties use the RAW format and open it in LR, you will find that the XPRO1's imaging is more delicate and three-dimensional just by opening it. In terms of texture and color, it is better than X100S. In addition, in terms of color gamut and tolerance, the RAW shot by the XPRO1 is stronger than the RAW shot by the X100S, so there is more room for adjustment in post-production. I have done the following experiments myself. I happen to have both cameras. I photographed a red fire hydrant under the bright sun, both in RAW format. When I opened it in LR, I found that the red overflow of the X100S was more serious. The details on the fire hydrant There is very little, it is all red, and XPRO1 retains the detailed texture on the fire hydrant better, and the red overflow control is very good. The above are my actual measurement results and are for reference only. It cannot be ruled out that there may be functional deficiencies or differences between the two cameras I have.