Door-changing photography

Changed the SLR and changed the door. A big obstacle to changing doors is the control habit, especially from micro-single to SLR. Fortunately, the control design of Canon SLR is very easy to use. As long as you practice for a period of time, Nikon's control design will take more time (especially Sony users).

Canon's manipulation is mainly concentrated in the right hand, and large parameters can basically be completed with one hand; Sony's micro-single control is completely concentrated in the right hand, and the size parameters can be completed with one hand; Nikon's control is scattered to both hands, and both settings and shooting control need to be operated by both hands.

The three control designs can't say who is good or bad. Canon and Nikon SLR are SLR machines after all, and it will be easier to control quickly if the control is dispersed to both hands. Even a Sony SLR has at least one turntable in its left hand. Nikon's design is scattered, and it takes some time to be proficient, but once familiar with it, it will be difficult to get used to the control logic of other families, so many Nikon users are more "loyal" and a little reluctant to change doors. Canon SLR is a compromise. Control is concentrated in the right hand, but the left hand also shares some functions. It is easy to use and control, but like most models whose control is concentrated on one side, it has the problem of easy misoperation, so the lock key to prevent misoperation is also one of the characteristics of Canon SLR. Sony is simply divided into three turntables to prevent misoperation caused by over-concentration of functions.

For the comparison of the three companies, players usually discuss the image quality, function, performance and so on. And often ignore the most critical factor of the camera, that is, manipulation. Especially for SLR cameras and professionals, control is often one of the keys to determine the level of the camera, and it also determines how difficult the camera can do. In addition to the distance between the reflector and the flange, the biggest reason for the large SLR is manipulation. It is easier and more flexible for humans to operate a thing with both hands than with one hand, and since it is operated with both hands, there must be enough room for operation with both hands. This is why after a hundred years of development, even if the camera has pinhole size, it can only be based on the "big head", and the camera used by ordinary people can be arbitrarily shaped. As long as it looks good and looks good, but the camera used by professionals who need flexible operation should be honestly made the size of their hands. The higher the model, the bigger it will be, and the more convenient it will be to operate (even if it is tiring to take it out to play). This cannot be explained by "multi-plug parts". As far as today's integration technology is concerned.

From this point, many things can be explained. For example, Sony micro-single is often compared with SLR by netizens, shouting "beyond", but which photographer didn't accompany Canon or Nikon SLR when growing up, and how many professional photographers dare to use micro-single to do things that need to be treated with caution? Is it more professional to be bigger? Yes, being big is really a professional need. Comfortable two-handed operation space and reasonable key layout are what professionals need most. Even Sony's "SLR" (now it can only be called a single mobile phone) can only be made large, and other small, light, fashionable and portable things can only be put in the second place. Micro-single can be developed in the gap between card machine and SLR because it is close to the portability and SLR performance of card machine and takes care of users who need a compromise between portability and performance, but its positioning is not for professional use (even if it is expensive). Netizens who compare micro-single and SLR often ignore the essential difference and positioning design between them, which is more of a transcendence complex. Just like a user comparing a notebook with a desktop, even if the keyboard is connected to the notebook to play CS, the performance should be compared with the desktop.

Therefore, before changing the SLR, you need to have an understanding of the difference between the two in essence, and then recognize your own needs, so that you will not listen to the wind and rain in the forum. After switching to the 5D series, its control has been related to speed, snapshot, fine adjustment, visual inspection and so on. I yearn for the effects of various lenses, stay away from portability, have fewer playable functions, but focus more on photography.